Has anyone got any experience with Ridley sizing? I'm looking at the Kanzo C Adventure to Replace my Scott Solace as a more all round winter / gravel bike, but I'm struggling with the sizing. I'm 6' 2" or 186cm tall and ride a 58cm Cervelo, 58cm Scott Solace (and a Large Bronson). I've had a bike fit in the past end up on 58cm frame. I could ride a 56 but it would be maxed out in terms of saddle height and stem length/spacers.
Going by the stack and reach measurements on the Ridley site I would have picked the XL. If I use their frame sizer on their website it puts me on a L. Having spoken to a shop they said I'm borderline M / L. The stack and reach of the M and L are both less than the Solace, and the Solace is squarely in endurance geometry so not very stretched out.
Stack / Reach
R3 58 605 / 396
Solace 58 612 / 389
Kanzo XL 609 / 394
Kanzo L 590 / 385
Kanzo M 568 / 376
Ask Paul milnes...they sell a lot of ridleys
Ridley Kanzo sizing is really odd. I ride a L in mtbs (Transition and Genesis) and L gravel bike (Titus) but my Kanzo is a S and it is bang on. Can’t remember what size I normally ride for a road bike.
I am 5’9”, think I have longish legs hence going for a L.
I would try one out if you can. My S is not small by any means, not much post showing, reach was bang on for me with a 100mm stem.
What Beefy said, definitely try one. They size up really long and tall.
Canzo speed XS owner 🙂
Bizarre sizing, I got measured up for a Ridley CX bike years ago by the Ridley rep, I'm six two and ended up with a 52cm.
Ok - had a few Ridley bikes - I’m 5’ 9’ and I’ve always been fitted to a small at the dealers bike fit service.
Always felt great - also ride cervelo Aspero and R5 in 54.
Hope this helps.
I have an xnight 54. I'm 5,10. Its for 110stem flat bars...perfect
As above Ridleys come up on the large side.
I have three “Large” bikes but my Ridley Noah is a Medium.
Fab bikes by the way.
Those stack numbers are interesting - adventure bike that's lower than a fairly sporty road frame
Fits with what you see in pro cross racing where they (women particularly from what I've noticed) seem to like a load of spacers. I guess that'd make them feel "long" for their sizing even if everything else matched ?
I'm usually a 58/xl kind of guy but have gone with a large kanzo fast, I'll let you know what it's like in march when it arrives. Looking the charts it seems they have less smaller size options.
OP - I'm the same height and a Ridley fanboy; I normally go for a size large frame but suspect medium would be a better fit on some
Ridley’s measurments are normally consistent across the ranges and over the years it’s just they have always been a size out with the names they give stuff. A Ridley medium is always everyone else’s large. Had a few ridleys but not sat on a kanzo sadly but seen a few in the flesh they are lovely but looking at the chart it’s pretty standard Ridley sizing just go down a size.
If my Fenix was anything to go by, go a size down.
Thank all for the feedback. I've settled on a large, one size smaller than my 'normal' size. My inside leg is 89cm and judging by the comments above one size smaller is the way to go. I don't mind the reach being a bit less on a gravel bike, but I'd rather not run 50mm of spacers if I can help it, which I suspect is what will happen on a medium.
(from a website I built)
Large seems a good choice, but note while the reach is less, the effective TT is slightly longer on the Kanzo - I doubt it'll feel less stretched out. Well within the 'tunable range' afforded by stem choice and sliding saddle fore/aft.
Enjoy the new bike!
Try this site, I used it to check against my old Ribble 7005 and my soon to arrive Sonder Camino