Forum menu
New bike deal-break...
 

[Closed] New bike deal-breakers

Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#5440774]

I've got a bike which I bought secondhand a couple of months ago, before my trip to the Alps. It's turned out to be a cracker, not to mention a hell of a bargain - apart from one thing: Internal cable routing.

I've had this before for gear lines, but this bike takes it to another level with internal routing of the brake hoses too - and not just through the mainframe but the chainstay as well.

Having had to swap the brakes over in resort and zip tie the new one to the top tube, I've now added internal cables to my list of bike purchase deal-breakers.

This list also includes...
Press-fit BBs on MTBs
SRAM gearing on MTBs
Short warranties on expensive frames


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:21 am
Posts: 1485
Free Member
 

Avid brakes


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:26 am
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

'Aspirational' pricing on Taiwanese made stuff.
Lack of mud clearance.
Brown paint.
650b.
Awful dealers.
Terrible websites.
Previous negative experiance of a brand.
Anything by Crank Brothers or Avid.
Money saving rip offs sold as innovation.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:35 am
Posts: 9238
Free Member
 

Just built my first bike with internal routing. I'd hate to do hydro brakes that way but for gear cables, quite happy. I had more problems not thinking about cable lengths before I started so I had to pull the cables out a couple of times to get it right.

In terms of deal breakers:
Shimano shifting on MTB - no problem with it I'm sure, just never used it so prefer SRAM (road is the other way around)
First generation "innovative" technology - I'll wait for the next generation

Other than that I'm quite happy to consider most things although I'd need convincing to buy an Orange Five or a Lefty fork


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:41 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Related to my original point: Reverb Stealth.

Anything by Crank Brothers or Avid.

I did have a great set of Speed Dial brake levers from about 1997, but apart from that I'm with you all the way.

Quite a few manufacturers seem to spec Crank Bros wheelsets on top-end bikes. Great way to put buyers off IMO.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anything that doesn't fit what I already own....in which case...

Anything 10 speed
Anything 29'er or 650b, or 27.5"

Plus plenty of kit I don't get on with....

Anything Avid
Anything Crank Bros

Am I in a new niche?


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:59 am
Posts: 728
Free Member
 

Internal hosing makes a bike look a lot cleaner, although it is a PITA. It wouldn't be such an issue if more brake manufacturers used QR couplings. Some does leave a bit to be desired with the chain stay routing though.

The only SRAM stuff I'll make an exception for is XX1 or XO1, otherwise, not interested. same for anything CB.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:59 am
Posts: 13871
Free Member
 

That new 456 with the 1 1/8th head tube - incompatible with the vast majority of new forks on the market. Just can't understand that.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 11:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Avid brakes[/i]

Amen to that


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 11:19 am
Posts: 34537
Full Member
 

avid brakes
poor mud clearance
ill put up with sram gears but they are getting swapped out as soon as they wear out or break


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 11:25 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Avid brakes.
Press fit/bb30
Gxp cranks
that giant tapered headset 'standard' (do they even make it any more?)
Proprietary rear shocks (eg spesh brain, that trek/fox one with the pivots in the middle of the air can)
integrated headsets(bearings go straight into frame with no external or semi-integrated cups) on mountain bikes.

I will also approach with caution:
wierd wheels with unusual spokes
rear ends with no replaceable hanger
rear ends with ludicrously expensive replacement dropouts (intense, newer yetis etc)

On a slight tangent, I wold be most impressed with a bike manufacturer that invested a tiny bit in supplying with the bike a spare hanger and a couple of sets of pre-cut helitape for areas where its extensive r&d has revealed cable rub to be an issue. It baffles me that they spend so much on r&d, marketing, teams etc but are too bone idle or cheapskate to do this on a bike that retails for a grand or five. 😕


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 11:33 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Avid/Shimano Brakes
Shimano Drive Train
Trigger Shift
SRAM Grip Shift is all I allow these days 🙂
Shimano Hubs, in fact anything not Hope or CK
PF/BB/Push in BB's again anything not Hope
Stupidly narrow bars (under 750mm)
also +1 for stupid stuff like custom shocks that are not available after market.

For some reason I don't buy complete bikes.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 11:39 am
Posts: 9396
Full Member
 

and a couple of sets of pre-cut helitape for areas where its extensive r&d has revealed cable rub to be an issue.

they could even stick it on for you!


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 11:39 am
Posts: 9396
Full Member
 

I avoid any bikes with over the top logo's or stickering


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 11:42 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Stupidly narrow bars (under 750mm)

[img] [/img] Gotta give those broad shoulders room to move properly.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 11:46 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

I am really not keen on Press fit bottom brackets, internal cable routing or manufacturers special standards. Cheap forks and ones that aren't bolt thru would stop me muting a bike nowadays as replacements are stupidly expensive.

Everything else can be changed & sold but it soon adds up. avid brakes and nasty own brand finishing kit and wheels are usually the first to go along with cheap and nasty chain sets.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 11:59 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

And another thing...

XT rear mechs and Deore shifters? No thanks, I'd rather have it the other way round please.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

honourablegeorge - Member

That new 456 with the 1 1/8th head tube - incompatible with the vast majority of new forks on the market. Just can't understand that.

Ahhh...but perfect for an updated version in 18 months time.....! £kerching£


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I kept saying I wouldn't have another Specialized after my 06 Enduro because of the silly way the the shocks are mounted. I now have an 11 Enduro Evo. 😐


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:12 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If i was haunted.
Dont think id buy a haunted bike.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:13 pm
Posts: 2429
Full Member
 

Prsss fit BB's - If I can avoid them, I can. They last less time than a square taper by a considerable margin and I notice no performance improvement.

The new type 2 SRAM rear mech that I am currently using has a lot more play than my older X9 mechs ever had even after several years of use.

Avid disk brakes - I have two bikes which came fitted with them and they suffer from fade, pumping up, inconsistent performance, squeal in the wet and have had several LBS rebleeds. They simply lack the reliability that I've enjoyed with Shimano and even Hayes over the years so I would never buy them aftermarket.

Carbon bike frames - I wear things out. I crash. I like technical steep and rocky trails. Carbon and I are ill matched bed fellows. 😀

Internal cable routing - it looks tidy but is just another way of water getting into the frame. It solves a problem that doesn't really exist in my mind.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hmm there seems to be a universal dislike of Avid brakes.

Why so exactly ?

Any particular version or is just a "they're all shite" thing.

I've only ever used Magura and Shimano so have no experience but have recently lusted over Avids XO trails.

Am I insane ?

Edit - Just saw Sanny's comments - Bo****ks !


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:23 pm
Posts: 27
Free Member
 

there were a few designs of Avids that were riddled with reliability issues (seals and leaking) and a convoluted bleeding process.
I have a pair of Elixir CRs that started leaking from the lever after a few months and a pair of Codes that lasted well until I bled them.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For me it's anything I'm stuck with as a result of the design: -

Press fit BB's
Lack of ISCG tabs
All 29ers
All 650b (what I buy needs to be compatible with existing 26ers)
+1 for proprietary shocks
Any frames with a history of cracking
Anything in its first year of production
Frames that only take 1 1/8" steerers
Frames which only have quick release on the rear

I wouldn't be keen on any of the following (might put me off or I'd probably just strip them off and sell them immediately): -

Anything CB
Fox forks
Wheels which have proprietary spokes
Wheels based on hubs other than Hope or CK


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

pymwymis - Member

Hmm there seems to be a universal dislike of Avid brakes.

Why so exactly ?

they're all shite?

i've had a few; the levers leaked, the calipers leaked, the pistons seized.

you may be able to get good ones, but they're more expensive than shimano, and no better.

my tuppence: tiny pivot bearings, i nearly bought a Giant Anthem but you find bigger bearings in a pocket watch.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:36 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I do wonder why so many bikes have SRAM/avid stuff as OE.

Must be because nobody wants to buy it aftermarket.

🙂

(Look at Formula instead, I reckon)


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:36 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Frames which only have quick release on the rear

I did have this on my list, but have softened my stance somewhat.

eg. Lapierre rear ends are stiff enough anyway due to the chainstay reverse taper.

Also softened on 15mm front axles, but only so I could get a Marzocchi 44 RC3 ti forks. Still wish everyone had just stuck to 20mm.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:39 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

pymwymis - Member

Hmm there seems to be a universal dislike of Avid brakes.

Why so exactly ?

Any particular version or is just a "they're all shite" thing.

Just to clarify, I like their cable brakes (both rim & disc), it's just the hydraulic stuff I'm not keen on.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So so far our composite ideal bike consists of

Nothing by :

Avid
CB
SRAM

No proprietary shocks
No fancy spokes
No carbon frames
No internal cableing
No 1/8" only steerers
No Fox forks
No press fit BB's
No large or medium sized wheels
No small bearings
No frames which have ever historically broken

Nothing 10 speed

Nothing in its first year of production

Nothing expensive made in Taiwan

Bars min width 750mm

And nothing haunted.

I'm looking forward to seeing the STW collective's perfect bike.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 12:50 pm
Posts: 23
Full Member
 

A pre-650b Heckler? 😛

Edit: Oh actually, weren't they 1 1/8 steerers? A new one, just get over the wheel size thing.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 1:04 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Santa Cruz is one of 'those' firms that expect you to pay a premium because their Taiwanese frames are somewhow seen as a cut above other perfectly good Taiwanese frames selling for half the price.

You're paying for the name.
In the UK at least.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 1:08 pm
Posts: 8403
Full Member
 

The Rockhopper I bought in 86 seems to only fail on bar width.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 1:10 pm
Posts: 194
Free Member
 

Annoying when you fall between sizes.
I would really like an 18" frame.
Lots of bikes either come in 17" or 19"


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 1:15 pm
 core
Posts: 2770
Free Member
 

On one do 18" frames, but................


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 2:37 pm
Posts: 3677
Full Member
 

sounds to me like everyone's ideal bike is one of these - [img] [/img]


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 2:43 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Any bike product managers reading will definitely have to be selective in the points they take.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 4:41 pm
Posts: 7630
Free Member
 

For me I would have to have no-

Sram gears
Avid brakes
Fox forks
Shimano hubs
Dropper posts that aren't Reverbs
Wheels with silly spokes
Stupid standards that aren't standards (29 or 650 wheels, 35mm bars, 34.9 seatposts, and in an ideal world no 15mm axles, pressfit bbs or daft headsets)
Internal routing
Crank brothers anything

There is still a surprising amount of bad products out there.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 9:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Avid brakes
No dropper routing
Pressfit BB
Too heavy for type/travel


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 9:10 pm
Posts: 20985
 

Well, I for one will not have any component that people might define as 'progress' in any form whatsoever. No siree!

That and gripshift.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 9:21 pm
Posts: 1388
Free Member
 

Bottle cage mounts. No mounts no deal.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:16 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Any frame that isn't a Maverick, sold my last Maverick, played musical frames trying to get something that came close, intense, nicolai, yeti, Ellsworth, now back to another maverick as its the only frame I know I love. A lesson learned...

Another vote for Avid brakes, they're shite.


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:22 pm
Posts: 2644
Free Member
 

I have two bikes.
One has a pressfit bb which is playing up and has been a complete pain.
The other has internally routed gear cables. The gears will not stay indexed and my research suggests this is a feature of - the internally routed cables (I haven't fixed the problem yet so I can't confirm this is the cause).


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:32 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

parkesie - Member

If i was haunted.
Dont think id buy a haunted bike

Dead man's bike.

Seat always cold


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 10:53 pm
Posts: 193
Free Member
 

Those Alpinestars Cro Mega used to fail at the weld of the seatstay and the chainstay - One of my uni friends had a couple, looked great in the flesh at the time with the classic smoke dart combination in skin walls.

I wouldn't buy a bike with the following;
SRAM gears
Internally routed brakes
Single pivot suspension
QR Fork
No gears (I'm not fit enough)


 
Posted : 20/08/2013 11:00 pm
Page 1 / 2