Forum menu
Mountain Mayhem - W...
 

[Closed] Mountain Mayhem - What do you hope they improve on?

 mokl
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have this awful feeling from watching that video that the new location is just as likely to turn into a mud bath of epic proportions. I really, really hope I'm wrong. The lie last year about them having tried to weather proof it was ridiculous. I expect they were trying to boost morale as the grim expectation of what was likely to ensue was dawning on the gathered participants.

They should get one of those Russian rain-dispersing machines for the weekend.


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 7:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shame if they split the camping from the course/arena with a busy(ish) road.

There is no trackside camping, but its not the otherside of a busy road. There is a ROW issue that prevents the course going through the campsite.


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 8:14 pm
Posts: 0
 

Get rid of the bike wash - Whats is the point?

not a question of it getting a dirty bike clean, more to do with getting it rideable again

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 8:18 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I'm hoping all the big girls blouses stay at home & stop moaning about everything..................If it rains, it's gonna be wet & very muddy,get over it........


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 8:18 pm
Posts: 1447
Full Member
 

+1
I had a whale of a time in the filth last year ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 8:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How much space do you get in the solo tent - are small tables for food and spare bikes allowed in there? If not then that's an improvement I'd like to see!


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 8:43 pm
Posts: 551
Free Member
 

Ban people who pretend to enjoy riding through a swamp.
Its not big, its not clever and it winds me up
Ride it yes.... but grudgingly please.


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 9:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It won't be a mud bath like last year, sorry! ๐Ÿ˜‰

Course preview report:
[url] http://www.acyclingteam.co.uk/mountain-mayhem-course-preview/ [/url]


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 9:08 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

Sounds good!


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 9:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The more i read these posts the more beer i think i`ll be drinking instead of riding and pushing !
+1


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 9:31 pm
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

there's only one way to approach it imho
[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 9:38 pm
Posts: 808
Free Member
 

@ rocketdog .... Love the back .... very well said ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 9:40 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

Definitely need a cover over the changeover area. How far away is the camping from the course? It really helps riding through the campsite in the early hours and getting cheered on by people that have had too much to drink etc. 24hr disco in the woods would be good like a few years ago at Eastnor, especially if by a little tricky feature that meant a cheer from the disco crew if you cleared it, possibly a jump of doom there.


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 10:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

More showers would be good. The showers nearest to us were out of order for a long time, and after muddy wet ridjng I really struggled to get warm despite getting into my sleeping bag with a duvet on top! A hot shower would have been good.


 
Posted : 29/05/2013 10:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A few sections were freshly cut, 2 in particular I was informed would be worked on heavily with hardcore added before the event.
- taken from mtbmatts link

This smacks of a mayhem blatant lie - the likely scenario is the organisers will pray for sun because there is zero cost attached to that. With the obvious cost-cutting/profit-increasing attitude of last years mayhem I struggle to believe they'll be outlaying some cost that is potentially not required if the weather is good a week before the event.

Separate (and still available for free pikey family holidays I assume?) campsite to the arena is a thieves dream. Good thinking during the venue selection process!


 
Posted : 30/05/2013 10:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A good addition would be prizes for the top 3 people riding dinglespeed 69ers!


 
Posted : 30/05/2013 10:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How is it going to work for solos with no trackside camping and no solo camping?

I would think the top solists have a pit crew, spare bike/s, big selection of food, cooker for a hot meal etc. Do those have to live back at the campsite or do they all cram into a solos marquee?

For the soloist without a pit crew it sounds like they either risk leaving all their stuff unattended or face a trip back to the camping field any time they want anything...


 
Posted : 30/05/2013 10:48 am
Posts: 1377
Full Member
 

I did Mayhem for the first time in 2011 and to be honest Myself and the "team" took it and ourselves way to seriously for amateur 24hr racers. We performed entirely as anticipated. Appallingly.
Should I do it again, I shall adopt RD'S tee shirt back motto to the nth degree.


 
Posted : 30/05/2013 11:43 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

This smacks of a mayhem blatant lie - the likely scenario is the organisers will pray for sun because there is zero cost attached to that. With the obvious cost-cutting/profit-increasing attitude of last years mayhem I struggle to believe they'll be outlaying some cost that is potentially not required if the weather is good a week before the event.

I dunno if you've done any other outdoors event recently but this totally is nt the case. The cost for MM is very reasonable, so many Triathlons/Tuff Guys type things now adays and the costs are astronomical.

I would have been keen to pay more for MM in the past if I new the course was going to be improved though.


 
Posted : 30/05/2013 11:39 pm
Posts: 1447
Full Member
 

A covered transition would be nice.
Trade stands with components for sale would be nice too (although I won't expect that so I'll bring spares).


 
Posted : 31/05/2013 8:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This smacks of a mayhem blatant lie - the likely scenario is the organisers will pray for sun because there is zero cost attached to that. With the obvious cost-cutting/profit-increasing attitude of last years mayhem I struggle to believe they'll be outlaying some cost that is potentially not required if the weather is good a week before the event.

I dunno if you've done any other outdoors event recently but this totally is nt the case. The cost for MM is very reasonable, so many Triathlons/Tuff Guys type things now adays and the costs are astronomical.

I would have been keen to pay more for MM in the past if I new the course was going to be improved though.

You're missing the point. I'm not disputing the entry price. However, it does creep up every year and the quality of event is decreasing.

We'll have to see if the organisers do weatherproof the mentioned sections in mtbmatts review link - but if you attended last years mayhem - they actually announced over the tannoy in the arena that they'd weatherproofed the course (and maybe on the website?). In reality it was the identical course to 2011 and resulted in a clay-mud-fest. Even the RAF team were running some of the course with their bikes on their shoulders


 
Posted : 31/05/2013 9:45 am
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

Poor tyre choice. I managed to ride the lot. ๐Ÿ˜€ It would have been faster to run around with a pair of handlebars though.

Velodromes are weather proof. It would be a bit dull though.


 
Posted : 31/05/2013 9:52 am
 tang
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Seeing as I'm next door and have some free time and no racing/pit duties, I'm going to be helping get the course ready.


 
Posted : 31/05/2013 10:38 am
 will
Posts: 44
Free Member
 

Well from Matt's report i'm looking forward to it ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 31/05/2013 10:49 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

I agree the course was ridiculous last year. I luckily had brought some MudX 1.8 and managed to ride alot of it but it was nt fun.

I agree they never should of suggested they'd attempted to weather proof the course, as short of building a trail centre they would never had done it.

But I also think its unfair to suggest that the event organisers have a "profit-increasing attitude". In comparison to many events there are reasonable.


 
Posted : 01/06/2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

so, now the date has passed - do we think the organisers weatherproofed the muddy bits of the course that required it as they said they would???


 
Posted : 17/06/2013 12:19 pm
Posts: 24440
Full Member
 

I think it was ok, mtbers who moan about mud being on an off road course seems wrong, if you want to race without a chance of mud you are doing the wrong sport


 
Posted : 17/06/2013 12:25 pm
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

I was riding 2.4s and they only clogged once on one lap and were cleared in 30 seconds. I didn't fit my skinny mud tyres.

So... as a wet weather track it was very ridable (assuming you could cope with how steep the hills were).


 
Posted : 17/06/2013 12:28 pm
 gee
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think a lot of the issues raised were dealt with well eg more showers, more loos etc.

The course will hopefully develop over the years.

GB


 
Posted : 17/06/2013 12:29 pm
Posts: 50
Full Member
 

I didn't see anywhere on the course that was 'unrideable' due to mud. I pushed up all the slippery hills because they were a combination of too steep and/or too slippy (incl. rocks and roots) for me and I was actually faster walking anyway. Everywhere else that was muddy (up, flat or down) I rode as fast as I could. I did 6 laps, ranging from 46mins to 51mins and didn't think that 'mud' was an issue at all.


 
Posted : 17/06/2013 12:35 pm
Page 2 / 2