Forum menu
More evidence of bi...
 

[Closed] More evidence of bikes still being built to "toy" not "proper" tolerances...

 jhw
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Yeah, I love the drama. So what's the difference between "tolerance" and "specification"?

Lawyer caught out blagging it with engineering terms not properly understood...


 
Posted : 11/05/2011 7:09 am
Posts: 4731
Full Member
 

The specification is what it's designed to, eg, 'The forks will withstand a force of x N with no more than y mm of deflection at the drop outs'

Tolerance is how tolerent the design is to variation. This variation can be manufacturing things, like the torque used to assemble it, or what range of sizes the parts are (the +/- bit in a dimension) but it could also be how it's used.

As has been mentioned above, without knowing more it is impossible to say whether the failure was due to design, tolerances, manufaucture or misuse.


 
Posted : 11/05/2011 8:11 am
Posts: 49
Free Member
 

Stuff breaks. Your assertation that it doesn't break in other sports etc has been proven wrong.

So, given that stuff breaks in all sports, hobbies and machines around the world, what is your point?


 
Posted : 11/05/2011 8:20 am
Page 2 / 2