Forum menu
Maxxis Advantage 2....
 

[Closed] Maxxis Advantage 2.4 - any good?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3112392]

Noticed that Merlin are doing a deal on these tyres at the moment, and as i'm going to need some new rubber for my bike trip i am looking at these tyres.
What do the Advantages roll like/grip like etc?

Good for a trip to Spain?


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 1:14 pm
 jonk
Posts: 1126
Full Member
 

They are good but i think the 2.4 is too wide. It isn't a dual ply tyre either so not very good for downhill only duties. I run the 2.25 they are bigger than 2.35 high rollers!


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 1:37 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've no experience of the 2.4's but run the 2.1's. The 2.1 come up big so the 2.4's must be huge.

They are light and roll well. Grip is ok as an all rounder but not great.

I'd be worried about the side wall strength if it was very rocky.


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 1:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've used the 2.25 Advantage and it is pretty wide it's a new design Maxxis so comes up big compared to older designs - quite a good rolling tyre and if it's the EXO version it will be pretty tough but as above, not a DH tyre.


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 1:57 pm
Posts: 3183
Full Member
 

I've used the Smaller sizes before, they work well. Better than the Highroller IMO.

The 2.4 is massive though.


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 1:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have a set on at the moment, will be swapped for something narrower and spikier in the next few weeks with winter setting in.

As said above they really are bloody massive - make sure your frame has sufficient clearance before buying.


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 2:04 pm
Posts: 0
 

They're hooooge! I bought some last summer for a day in the lakes - no pinch flats and they seemed to hold their corners well.


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 2:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They are HUGE. Many frames cannot accomodate them.

I live in Spain. Large(ish) volume fast tyres are the thing here, I recon. Crossmark 2.25 on the back - large volume, very quick. Up front anything from a High Roller to an Ignitor - I use an Ignitor 2.35, nice'n'drifty in loose over hardpack - teaches you to lean round corners properly. I recon sticky tyres are a waste of time here, no grippier but much slower.


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 2:33 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Thanks for that Jambon - a Spanish perspective is useful 🙂

Bike is a Wolf Ridge 6.8 so clearance shouldn't be a problem, if they are that big though perhaps they'll be draggy?

Hmm, back to the drawing board i think..


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 5:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I ran a pair of 2.4 advantages until they were worn out, thought they rolled & gripped pretty well, ran them tubeless (stans)at 20psi in Spain with ciclo montana - no punctures during the week. Eventually destroyed the rear one (pinch hole in the sidewall) in the Peaks & had a dummy spitting moment trying to repair it!!


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 6:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I have some 2.4 barely used as they are a bit large for the general trail riding I do. Looking to get rid of them if any body wants the pair for £15, but its collection from Newcastle.


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 6:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

dunno about spain but they're one of my favourite tyres of all time. use a sensible tube and yes they wear out on the side walls but they've kept my 17 stone a*se going over peak trails.


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 6:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I run one on front of my mbop.
Its wide for sure. But offers superb grip in all realistic mtbing conditions.

Not good for racing etc.
But if grip is your main concern - their great.


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 6:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

No idea about the 2.4's but the 2.1's are a brilliant all round tyre. I ran them last year front and rear and this year on the front on one bike and on the rear of another.

As a reasonably fast rolling grippy tyre for xc they are hard beat.


 
Posted : 04/09/2011 6:50 pm