Community

Forum menu
Lightish hardtail f...
 

[Closed] Lightish hardtail frame for 140mm forks

 jonb
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I know any fram designed to take 140mm forks is never going to be an XC machine and I don't want that.

But if I was to replace a 456 and waslooking to save some weight what lighter frames of this typre are available. With the 456 weighing 2.5 kg there must be a few.

Considered titanium but the bank balance says no, chameleon, pace 305, cotic soul and ?


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 3:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chumba HX1 takes 140mm forks has an EBB for Singlespeed duties and nice and light! £499 😉

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pace 305, nuff said.


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:03 pm
 nbt
Posts: 12470
Full Member
 

Ragley blue pig (steel) is about the same weight as the 456 (steel), the Mmmbop is aluminium and a lot lighter (and cheaper than the chameleon et al, I htink)


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:09 pm
 Kuco
Posts: 7216
Full Member
 

That Chumba though nice looks harsh, is it?


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:14 pm
 StuF
Posts: 2098
Free Member
 

Orange P7 - probably too heavy


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:18 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Secondhand Chameleon with a respray?


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

PA 853


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:25 pm
Posts: 34968
Full Member
 

+1 for a Cham. Can do XC if you want.


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Really like the look of the Chumba, anyone know the weight, nothing about weight on the Chumba site. Great review here: <


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cotic Soul is 130mm max

Ragley mmmBop? 3.7lbs I think. Aluminium though. Could get hold of a carbon post and run fatter tyres?


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 4:42 pm
Posts: 99
Free Member
 

My Dialled PA has pretty sturdy kit on it (721 rims, Magura forks) and still is pretty light - in fact it felt considerably lighter than the Cove Stiffee that I rode at the weekend.

Comes in at around 28lbs & will take 140mm forks. TBH I wouldn't really want anything lighter with that kind of travel - I like the bike to feel planted, rather than skitting around over rough stuff as lighter bikes sometimes do.

The 853 version was only 3 ounces lighter than the standard.


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 5:42 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Another RC305 here.
[url= http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3591/3604765898_e9abd47a53.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3591/3604765898_e9abd47a53.jp g"/> [/img][/url]


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 6:00 pm
Posts: 10498
Free Member
 

Cove Stiffee


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 6:08 pm
Posts: 8846
Full Member
 

Titanium Alpine. Mike...! 😉


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not sure of exact weight on the Chumba HX1 but it is around 4lb for a medium, will weigh one if you want?


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 7:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Marin B17


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 7:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Whyte 19?


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 7:18 pm
Posts: 7935
Free Member
 

IME of looking for something similar, you'll be hardpushed to find anything in steel much lighter that the existing crop.

When passed CEN testing the (I assume) 140mm Cotic soul might be the lightest of the crop.

Aluminium for lighter weight and still in your budget.


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 7:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another vote for PA here. I`ve heard of someone running a 150mm fork.....
🙄


 
Posted : 29/07/2009 8:34 pm