Layback options wit...
 

[Closed] Layback options with dropper style seatposts ?

Posts: 496
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I run a Thomson layback post but want a gravity dropper style post. Are there any on the market that will offer a similar amount of layback as the Thomson ?


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 5:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Kindshock/Pure Race i900/i900r has a fair bit of layback. Not sure if its the same as a thomson, though I didn't think thomson laybacks had loads of layback due to the inline clamp?


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 5:19 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
Topic starter
 

10 degrees on a Thomson. If any droppers go that far, it's far enough.
From previous bad product experience, and non favourable anecdotes on here, there is one company's products that won't be considered.


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 5:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm considering buying an i900, and now worried that [i]that[/i] is the "company's products that won't be considered".

Please reassure me ๐Ÿ˜•


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 6:14 pm
 Taz
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

My i900 is great, though the remote lever is pretty crappy. Change that to a pop loc lever (when the original breaks) and you are good to go


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 6:18 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Can we get back on topic ? What's the layback like on [b]all[/b] the dropper posts ?


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 6:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My i900r has been great so far. No play whatsoever and works like I wanted it to

5" of drop gives me about the right amount of drop I was after (and find I set at hieghts right through its range

4" of frop (or 3") wouldn't give it the same potential. Though I got one because my stumpjumper fsr frame only had 3" of conventional seatpost drop and wanted some more as it limited it a fair bit when trying steep/jumpy stuff I'd not ridden/cleaned before

EDIT: I'm perfectly happy with the remote lever. I don't think I'd like a poploc lever. With the supplied remote it'd be easier to still hold on in (semi-rough) stuff and push the lever. A poploc would require more hand moving. I wouldn't want to have to that. For me it would limit the dropper posts potential to drop in more situations/rougher terrain


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My I900 has been good so far. The remote lever snapped after two rides but was swiftly replaced on warranty with no hassle. The lever remains pretty spindly looking but the post itself is great.


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 7:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

For the love of Pete, will somebody tell him the Layback angle! ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 7:29 pm
 Taz
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

The i900 has a fair bit of layback. No idea what the actual amount is. reckon it is more than a Thomson though. No idea if it actually is. Point is it is roughly, exactly, similar.

I also have a Gravity dropper. It is inline. Moved from a Thompson layback, shifted the saddle slighty back on the rails. Happy ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 19
Free Member
 

Offset on a i900 is 27.5mm and the Thomson is 20mm (moderate accuracy bike is currently upside down in a room where the light is not working) I think that the Thomson looks more due to the bend in the shaft (as opposed to an offset at the clamp)

Visual inspection prior to fitting suggested that the offset was near identical and a field trail confirmed that it was possible to replicate the same riding position. This is based on personal option rather then measurement as I neglected to take measurements prior to fitting

8)


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 8:10 pm
 v10
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Just had a rough measure up with the i900 im selling ๐Ÿ˜‰ and my Thomson layback. I900 seems to provide about 5mm more layback but you could obviously adjust this out on the saddle rails.


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 8:16 pm
Posts: 496
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Now that's the kind of objective answer I was hoping for 8)

But thanks all anyhow.


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 8:17 pm
 v10
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ooops.. basically what Graham just said (his form of measuring sounds like it involved a tape so will probably be more accurate than mine). ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 27/04/2009 8:18 pm