Forum menu
[quote=squoglybob ]i went in to the office this week and one of the girls who starts at 6 still has NO lights on her bike, if she gets knocked off i take it that its the motorists fault.
The chances are it would be, yes.
Aye, storm in a teacup, which was partly why the response was a flounce rather than a coherent argument 😉 It's just that it seemed anything but "offering an opinion based on the info in the link": your sequence of events was in direct conflict with the info in the link. (And I know reporting is often way off the mark, but still…)
Bez - I think some of us were applying the filter of our experiences on the road and "what motorists say"* along with a dose of reporting inaccuracy and deciding what the most likely scenario was based on all the available evidence. For me at least that isn't exactly how the woman is reported as describing it, though that's just my opinion.
* has anybody done that video?
What Aracer said ^ [more articulately that I could]
Yeah, I follow that. It's the assumption that what happened here is the same as what you've experienced and seen many times before. But that doesn't mean it happened here, and (thus far) there's a total lack of information to say that it is what happened here. I've reasonable suspicion that the other side of the story may turn out to be different, but to take that report (or any of the others which give the same details) and state "driver squeezes cyclist" and that "she's a typical clueless, selfish ****" seems… a bit of a reach?
Fundamentally, there are nutjobs around and some of them are on bikes. If we're talking about someone who takes a D-lock and smashes a car window in, my thought is that we're above averagely leaning towards nutjob territory. Given how aggressively I've seen some people ride I don't see any reason to assume the story must be completely false.
But, like we all agree, we have one side of the story. Let's not jump to conclusions. (If we even still give a flip by now.)
Shall we have some gin and call it quits? 😉
Can I have my gin in a glass rather than the other way round?
Yeah, I follow that. It's the assumption that what happened here is the same as what you've experienced and seen many times before. But that doesn't mean it happened here, and (thus far) there's a total lack of information to say that it is what happened here. I've reasonable suspicion that the other side of the story may turn out to be different, but to take that report (or any of the others which give the same details) and state "driver squeezes cyclist" and that "she's a typical clueless, selfish ****" seems… a bit of a reach?Fundamentally, there are nutjobs around and some of them are on bikes. If we're talking about someone who takes a D-lock and smashes a car window in, my thought is that we're above averagely leaning towards nutjob territory. Given how aggressively I've seen some people ride I don't see any reason to assume the story must be completely false.
But, like we all agree, we have one side of the story. Let's not jump to conclusions. (If we even still give a flip by now.)
Shall we have some gin and call it quits?
One of the most rational pieces on one of these topics. Bravo.
I'll take mine shaken, stirred and smashed over a child's face with a d-lock
Heh. Aracer beat me to that joke.
Evening. Oh bbc I wonder how many road rages, dealths etc etc there are a day? Stop the selective one sided redtop jounalism. Wheres the quality?
