Just yesterday
*goes on to mention a c30 year old billboard advert*
your perception of time is ****ed
That’s a pretty tone deaf response from stw, and certainly one that is unlikely to encourage people to hold onto their subs.
That’s a pretty tone deaf response from stw, and certainly one that is unlikely to encourage people to hold onto their subs
You demand an answer to your objections, otherwise you're cancelling your subs?
It's an MTB magazine, not a Greenpeace publication. Get a grip
It’s an MTB magazine, not a Greenpeace publication. Get a grip
And there are plenty of folk out there who would rather be more sustainable.
If the mag is incompatible with their values then they have every right to cancel, frankly I'm not sure why you think that's any of your business.
I do hope this wins thread of the week.
It’s an MTB magazine, not a Greenpeace publication. Get a grip
I think the point was more that one week they are promoting being green and sustainable and the next they they are promoting the polar opposite.
You cant be all things to all people or you end up being nothing to no one.
You demand an answer to your objections, otherwise you’re cancelling your subs?
I didn’t say I was cancelling, but that it’s likely to cause others too - as demonstrated by somebody else stating that prior to the STW response. Given the repeated STW requests for people to sign up and support them, it feels like not a lot of thought has gone into this. Unless they are getting paid enough for the ad for it to make it worth their while.
And I would prefer that STW continues to get decent ad income from wherever they can
Me too. I suggest tobacco advertising, buck the current trend, #smokeupjohnny. 😂
how about an advertorial on how to pay for your new Ebike ? - sponsored by paddy power ?
