Forum menu
Is a ss running 52:...
 

[Closed] Is a ss running 52:16 considered normal for the road?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Rode my newly cobbled together winter hack in to work this morning, and **** me! it was everything i could do to get up some of the bigger hills.

Have i been too ambitious with the large chain ring?


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 9:53 am
Posts: 3
Free Member
 

too ambitious mate! that's not far off an outdoor velodrome race gear.

try a 48 front or 18 rear


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 9:55 am
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

That is a ridiculous gear unless you only ride downhill.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 9:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I used to use 48:16 around London - Graeme Obree likes bigger....


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 9:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

48/18 worked for me as a go everywhere gear. I'd have gone to 48/16 if I was sticking to flatter stuff.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 9:57 am
Posts: 6985
Free Member
 

i started with 52:18 but found it to tough, using what i had lying around i then went to 42:18 which was lovely to cruise along but i couldnt keep up with traffic in town. Currently on 48:18 which i can just drag up the chiltern hills, or at least the ones i need to to get to work.

i love a good thread about ratios [/geek]


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 9:59 am
Posts: 5909
Free Member
 

I commute on 32:17, i'm in no hurry ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:03 am
Posts: 6985
Free Member
 

keep the chainring and go 52:19


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:04 am
 Sam
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

42/17 is the road fixed gear of champions


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nah, it's crap - 48:18 FTW ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:08 am
Posts: 27
Full Member
 

I rode 85 miles to Skegness earlier this year on 53:16 but that was almost all flat...

My normal 39:16 is way too spinny for the road. I'll be doing 48:18 on my new commuter ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:08 am
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

i like evens, 42:16


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:09 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

44:16 on my road fixed, but that's because I like to use it on flat and a few lumps.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:16 am
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

45:18 is best


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Everyone on here talks about ratios, when according to Our Lord Sheldon it's [url= http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/ ]gear inches[/url] that matter.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:22 am
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

ratios for off-road. gear inches for road and track.

i would aim for 66-74 gear inches depending on terrain or if you are a spinner or grinder.

a good gear inch calculator calculator here:
[url= http://software.bareknucklebrigade.com/rabbit.applet.html ]http://software.bareknucklebrigade.com/rabbit.applet.html[/url]


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:25 am
Posts: 4300
Free Member
 

44/16 here.

52/16 I'd never get the bike moving away from the lights!


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:28 am
Posts: 12
Free Member
 

OK, OK. I "run" 72 inches on the road, and 84 inches on the track. Mmkay?


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:28 am
Posts: 6985
Free Member
 

i cant use that at work, but i like my 72"

from Sheldon


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:29 am
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

72inches for road and 83 for the once a year track session.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

OP. You must have some monster thighs for that gear. I run 44:17 on the roadrat and occasionally mull over dropping a tooth off the back. My commute is up and over a steepish hill and I like to sprint from the lights so find 44:17 works for me


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

That's ok, i thought i was being a wusser, when i nearly stalled it at the lights (can you stall a bike?)

Just been over the road to my LBS and he is getting me a 22 for the rear.

I don't have monster thighs, but i'd have legs like Arnie if i could ride that thing all winter!


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 10:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

79" for me.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 11:49 am
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

You'd usually go slightly lower for a SS gear than with fixed, since you can coast downhill.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 12:13 pm
Posts: 13259
Free Member
 

66" or 69".... i'm more of a spinner than a grinder. 44:18 or 46:18. can't remember.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 12:36 pm
 Sam
Posts: 2390
Free Member
 

according to Our Lord Sheldon it's gear inches that matter

I thought he was a big proponent of gain ratio?


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 12:40 pm
Posts: 0
 

why not have gears :-), then you can choose as you go along? I really don't see the appeal of hampering yourself with only one gear.


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 12:40 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

I've done longish (100km) road rides on 58" fixed (34:16 on big 700c tyres), but that's way too low really. It makes downhills incredibly slow and simultaneously terrifying.

Going to try a bigger chainring, I think. A 38 would give me 65" and a 42 72".


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 12:40 pm
 IHN
Posts: 20102
Full Member
 

Das ist numberwang!


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 12:45 pm
Posts: 20611
Full Member
 

48:17 (76") on my roadie SS. I ran it 48:16 (81") for a few years but 17 is a bit nicer on the hills.

On the track I use a 47:14 so about 90".
I thought I liked pushing bigger gears but 52:16 is TOO high!


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 12:49 pm
Posts: 1257
Free Member
 

48/18 works great for commuting round brum


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 12:54 pm
Posts: 66092
Full Member
 

It's among the various gears I have access to but it'd be too low for the ride to work and too high for the ride back ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 1:01 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

I thought he was a big proponent of gain ratio?

he was but trackies talk in gear inches but oddly for 27in even though they all use 700c. it doesn't change the ratio that much though.
gear inches is so much easier to understand.
gear combos can give the same gear inches but one may sound harder than the other. 50/18 is the same as 45/16, no confusion with GI's


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 1:19 pm
Posts: 4914
Full Member
 

I commuted for a couple of years on a 48 x 16.

Mainly level riding (Taunton) but could still blast up hills all be it not very long ones ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

Beast in question:

[IMG] [/IMG]

Biopace ring too ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 08/09/2010 1:43 pm