Forum menu
Inbred 18" to ...
 

[Closed] Inbred 18" to 16"?

 Slap
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3271209]

At 5'10" I guess I'm kinda in between sizes. I've had an 18" inbred for a while but always felt I should've got a 16" instead as I'd prefer it to be more flickable/manoeuvrable in corners. I was having a look at the geometry pages on On-One's website and the top-tube length difference is only 13mm! Would this really make that much of a difference or would I be better off looking elsewhere?

Has anyone tried both sizes and felt there was a noticeable difference?


 
Posted : 23/10/2011 11:37 am
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

5'9" here & used to have a 16". Always felt I was running too much seat post, & that it was a bit cramped (even with 90mm stem). Trying my mates 18" confirmed that I should have gone for the bigger size. Now on an 18", but the 29er version & it fits like a glove (with 70mm stem). Very happy with the fit.

I'd say stick with the 18". ๐Ÿ˜•


 
Posted : 23/10/2011 12:11 pm
 nimo
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You will get a more flickable bike by the back end being shorter.
The 456 is quite long wich makes it great at soeed but a bit less flicky than some hardtails. BB height plays a big part to.
The 456 is such a good alrounder because it is not too flicky . One mans flicky, is another mans twitchy , is another mans broken collar bone......


 
Posted : 23/10/2011 12:12 pm
Posts: 2007
Full Member
 

I'm 5'10" with a 16" inbred - occasionally it feels a bit too small, but it's my second bike for short play rides so it's fine for what I use it for. I don't know if I'd get on with it so well if I used it for much longer rides.


 
Posted : 23/10/2011 12:22 pm
 Slap
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Food for thought - thanks for the feedback. It sounds as if the only way I'll find out for sure is to try a 16" out for myself.

Anyone want to go the other way and swap their 16" for my 18"?


 
Posted : 23/10/2011 5:24 pm
Posts: 3273
Free Member
 

I've got a 16" steel ss inbred, an 18" tinbred and an 18" whippet. TBH I don't notice a lot of difference between the 16 and 18". I think having a longer seatpost on the 16 actually helps with comfort. Wish I'd got a 16" whippet for that reason as its very stiff! (quick though)

I'm 5'10" too.

If you are anywhere near the New Forest you are welcome to have a go.


 
Posted : 23/10/2011 5:42 pm
 ski
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Owned both sizes and the same height, I prefer the 16"
16"

[img] [/img]

18"

[img] [/img]

Even use my Mrs 14"

[img] [/img]

All good ๐Ÿ˜‰

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 23/10/2011 5:55 pm
Posts: 6332
Free Member
 

I'm 5'11" and have run both sizes. For longer rides the I found the 18 better but for chucking about on shorter rides the 16 is better. As you say, the difference is pretty small.


 
Posted : 23/10/2011 5:59 pm
Posts: 35
Free Member
 

I've had both, 16 and 18, and Inbred and 853. All gone except the 16" DN6. I am slightly shorter but found the 16" perfect. Infact if anyone knows where I can lay my hands on an early 16" non disc frame, I have a plan...


 
Posted : 23/10/2011 7:29 pm