I like my mud X but...
 

[Closed] I like my mud X but !

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I like the mud x on the back but it's a bit thin up front. Whats a good winter front Tyre.


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 7:42 am
Posts: 8738
Full Member
 

Blue Groove 2.35 DTC works for me...


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 7:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What size is a your mud x? 1.8??

I like 2.1 swampthings for XC, still not what you would call large volume though. You could go bigger but for general XC riding there isnt much point.


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 8:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Had the blue groove on for a winter it was a bit to big bulky. Do they do a swamp thing in 2.2. The mud x is a 2.


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 8:38 am
Posts: 613
Full Member
 

swamp thing in 2.3 & 2.5 (although this is supposed to not be much bigger than the 2.3).


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 8:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Trailraker 2.1 for'd. Mud x down aft.


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 8:59 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its the extra weight in the bigger swampthings, the 2.1's are about 600g, factor the extra drag on the bigger tyre in the mud and I wouldnt want to go there, the 2.1's ofer plenty of grip.

2.1's are getting scarce as they seem to have dropped it..


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 9:02 am
Posts: 4789
Free Member
 

thinner cuts through the mire better


 
Posted : 13/11/2009 9:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I need a tyre for mud at 2.2/2.3


 
Posted : 14/11/2009 5:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Think I'll change out my 2.4 NN for my 2.2 NN and give that a try.


 
Posted : 14/11/2009 5:58 am
Posts: 0
 

The Bonty Jones ACX comes in a size 2.2 or 2.35 and it has a similar tread pattern to the Mud X.


 
Posted : 14/11/2009 8:53 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

what about a bigger mud x?
1.8 aft and 2.0 fwd on mine.


 
Posted : 14/11/2009 9:12 am
Posts: 1029
Free Member
 

I had 2 inch mud x front and back but found it a bit lacking up front on wet roots of which there are lots in the south east, so I stuck a 2.35 st swampthing on which is much better, not as good at cutting through mud obviously but much more confidence inspiring upfront, although Ill probably try a 62a next time, the super tacky is a bit draggy.


 
Posted : 14/11/2009 4:31 pm
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

I've just replaced a knackered pair of 2.1 Trailrakers with 2.0 Mud X's, same size really.

I'd only go wider on the front if I was using them in my Fox 36's, as the Reba's just don't have the mud-room for any more.

But had to laugh, on the packet they are labelled as 500grams - they both weighed in at 585grams...


 
Posted : 14/11/2009 5:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I run a mudx on the back and a acx up front like sum.


 
Posted : 14/11/2009 5:52 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

br

do you really weigh things before you put them on ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 14/11/2009 8:19 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Running 2.35 swampies on my p7 , they weigh a ton but they're good. I don't worry much about needing a thin tyre to cut through mud as 15st works just as well.


 
Posted : 14/11/2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

2.3 Conti Survival - 8 years old & still going strong...


 
Posted : 14/11/2009 8:32 pm