Forum menu
How big is your rin...
 

[Closed] How big is your ring?

 edd
Posts: 1390
Full Member
 

30:42t WILL give an insanely low gear.

30:42 gives a ratio of 0.714
24:36 gives a ratio of 0.666

ie A 10 speed triple (24-32-42 with an 11-36 cassette) will give a lower bottom gear. Thus I would hardly define 30:42 (which is a harder gear) as "an insanely low gear".

Edit:
Even if you run a 10 speed double (26-38) with an 11-36 cassette the easiest gear ratio is almost equal:
30:42 gives a ratio of 0.714
26:36 gives a ratio of 0.722


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 11:19 am
Posts: 6581
Free Member
 

Thus I would hardly define 30:42 (which is a harder gear) as "an insanely low gear".

It's lower than I have on my double setup


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 11:25 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Its higher than i have on my single setup.


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 11:27 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]It's clearer! what gearing have you got on your MTB?[/i]

34:16 ๐Ÿ˜‰

42:16 on my CX. I'll admit though, that's sometimes a struggle to get up the big hills. I make funny faces.

Edit: I've no idea what is on my geared MTB to be fair, it's a double but I've not ridden it for years. It needs new brakes and wheels. And apparently a cassette that bangs against protruding rocks.


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 11:39 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why would it bang against rocks?


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 11:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

32 with 11-36 out back. Scott Spark 26. Might stick a 30 on for big mountain days though.


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 11:44 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

[i]Why would it bang against rocks?[/i]

It wouldn't, it's a joke.


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 12:12 pm
Posts: 11937
Free Member
 

I briefly had 1x 9-speed on my MTB; a 32t chainring with, I think, an 11-32 cassette and 26" wheels. That was a silly low ratio and I'd not bother going that low if I went 1x again. My cx bike has a compact double crankset and an MTB cassette so also has a 1:1 lowest ratio which I don't think I've ever used.


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 12:47 pm
Posts: 6947
Full Member
 

Running a 36 here - [no other choice with my crankset]. It's on a 26 whippet that climbs great, so there's nae bother for most riding. 34 would prob be marginally better for me, but doubt there's much in it.
Would ideally fit one of those big cassette rings for long days, but not gotten round to looking at them yet.


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 12:48 pm
Posts: 4338
Free Member
 

36 / 11-36 here. Left over from a week in the alps. Have ridden cwm carn a couple of times and its a bit of a grind. A weekend in the peaks and i'd have to get something smaller


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 12:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

XX1, 28 up front, 42 rear. North Lakes, so you all know how hilly it is up here!!!!

BTW, the front ring is starting to "hook" and not letting go of the chain cleanly, only 6 months in....


 
Posted : 20/02/2015 11:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Old bike was 32t up front with 11-36 on back. Up in Aberdeenshire for most of my riding and managed fine, but it's not super steep here. Managed a few rides in the Cairngorms ok but struggled on long steep climbs but that's mostly down to me not being the fittest and not enjoying pedalling uphill (rarely motivated to burn energy flying up a hill!).

New bike is X1 with a 34 tooth front chainring, so wondering how I'll get on! Hoping my legs will just get stronger rather than I suddenly can't make it up hills anymore ๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 21/02/2015 2:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

have been running 34t with 10-42 xx1 for the last year on 650b without too much bother but I had a spare 30t so that's on at the moment to help with long steep climbs. Mainly down to my lack of fitness no reflection on the bike.


 
Posted : 21/02/2015 2:52 pm
Page 2 / 2