Forum menu
Hope pro2 or Chris ...
 

[Closed] Hope pro2 or Chris king

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Ive got to choose between these two hubsets, which would be best for a cotic soul, im edging towards the kings for quicker engagement and easely adjusted bearings

Jon


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 1:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had the same dilema when i built my bike up last Month !

I went for HOPE Pro 2, Then ended up with an inset KING headset and kinda regretted not getting the KING hubs.

Mind you my old Bulb hubs from HOPE were on my Bullit for 8 Years 😯


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 7:34 am
 Dino
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

King= nice but pricey
Hope= nearly as nice but cheaper


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 8:27 am
 StuE
Posts: 1841
Free Member
 

I have both, Kings don't seem any quicker to engage to me.Hopes are easy to service, change bearings etc,adaptable qr.15mm,20mm. I got the King wheelset cheap off of ebay otherwise I would have bought another set of Hopes.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 8:29 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Loving my King hubs here to be honest.

The rear hub engagement is great IME and has made it far easier to get up technical things. On stripping it down to service, the machining inside is spectacular. I still have no idea how it works though.

The King rear makes a far nicer noise than the Pro 2 IMO too. Pro 2's sound like a 1950's football rattle.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 8:36 am
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

DT 240. Cheaper than King with less maintenance, lighter and better rolling than either. 36t star ratchet upgrade for King like engagement.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 8:45 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What's the difference between a pro 2 and pro 3...except price?


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 8:49 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Neither. At that price - ROYCE.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 8:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've had both King and Hope, and now I have 3 sets of Hope hubs and no King. The Hope hubs engage fast enough for me - I didn't notice any difference in engagement except between Hope/King vs. low-end Shimano.

Hopes are more serviceable, have all spares easily available, and good backup. Everything wears out, but at least Hope will get you up and running again.

I am DT-curious but don't have the £ to try them out 🙂


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 9:04 am
 StuE
Posts: 1841
Free Member
 

I have DT 240's as well, Hope are lighter (yes I have weighed them) 240.s better rolling ? can you really tell.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 9:11 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

After spells of Hope and King hubs, with problems from both teams I now have DT 240s on two of my bikes and 440s on my DH bike. Flawless use for three years. Don't think i'll ever use anything else, though I do fancy some i9s some day maybe 😉


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 9:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chris king hubs sound like a bloody air siren. Hopes sound much better IMO therefore hopes for me 🙂


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 9:26 am
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

Again I don't like the CK noise, Pro II for me - reliable (IME), adaptable (what axle flavour would Sir like?) and fully home servicable with no special tools.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 11:05 am
 DT78
Posts: 10066
Free Member
 

Chris king hubs sound like a bloody air siren

Really? Mine sounds like I've got a swarm of angry bees chasing me 🙂
Quieter than proIIs'''

Have both, like the CK 'pimp' factor but prefer the fact I can service the proII's myself. Though I needed to replace the bearings after one years use, I thought they'd last longer

Also second the fact I personally cannot tell any difference in 'pickup' I have even ridden the wheels back to back to try to tell...but then again I can't really see much difference between my TV and a HD version!


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 11:34 am
Posts: 2884
Free Member
 

the machining inside is spectacular.

You, my friend, need to get out more.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 11:53 am
Posts: 9074
Free Member
 

Oooo, are Royce doing disc hubs now? Must have a look for those.

Of the options though, King, Hope stuff isn't nearly as good as it used to be.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i have pro2's and DT240's. The pick up on the DT is noticably better than the hopes but for the money you can't really go wrong.

The king's i had before were very nice but i wouldn't pay full whack for them


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 2:37 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I have DT 240's as well, Hope are lighter (yes I have weighed them)

You need new scales then, 240s are about 30g lighter, Centrelock ones are lighter still.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 2:46 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

Can I suggest dealing with this problem in three stages...
1. Find out who imports/distributes Chris King....
2. If it is who I think it is, talk to people who have dealt with him....
3. Realise that above and beyond that, spares for CK will be more problematic in this country than spares for Hope, decide to buy Hope!

I must vaguely admit I do like the noise CK rear hubs make!!!!!

And...in my experience...DT hubs were not very weather proof ie...a lot of the water that hits the outside seems to end up inside


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 3:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That saved me the trouble, was going to post almost the exact same question today.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 3:36 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

King are imported by Evolution Imports, who share premises with Bromley Bike. Headed up by Mark someone or other. I'm not sure he's the best 'advert' for Chris King products!


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 5:08 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Oooo, are Royce doing disc hubs now? Must have a look for those.

Yup. They have for quite a while now. And let's be honest, they make King hubs look shoddy and over complicated. 🙂


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 5:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If you want quality, King everytime over hope.
Look into Hadley too


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Royce are heavier and no axle options.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 6:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

King.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 6:07 pm
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

Royce are heavier and no axle options.

They're also cheaper, British, rarer, waaaaaaay better looking, and you'll be able to leave them to your gradkids in your will 🙂


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 6:40 pm
Posts: 682
Full Member
 

I was not impressed with king front hub on a friends new bike... he had to file his front disk mount on a brand new Fox 36 fork so the disc rotor would clear it!!

Apparantly King front hubs(certainly the model he had) have a wider disc spacing...nasty!!

Hope would be my first choice. I understand there is nothing wrong with King rear hubs and in terms of pawl engagement Hadleigh (spelling?) hubs are great too. In my experience though Hopes are very good. If you want super heavy duty pawl engagement you can upgrade them to a stainless steel freewheel. I have done that on my FR/DH bikes. Lots of hubs now come with aluminium freewheels including Hope King etc to keep weight down. For maximum reliability if you are a real "masher" its worth getting the stainless one.

Oops you said for a Cotic Soul... sorry for going OT. For that I would keep a standard pro 2 with Aluminium freewheel to keep the weight down. I use the pro 2 aluminium freewheel version on my trail bike and its fine despite going through losts of wet winters.


 
Posted : 30/10/2010 6:46 pm