[Closed] He wrote in his diary....bother ! 🙁

I think that might be a bit flawed. Basing it on population means that it thinks Slough is a more significant local target than NATO HQ in Northwood, RAF Northolt, or Heathrow.

I don't get that at all. I'm confused. What's the whole 'cities of x population' variable about, and the number?

You're dead!
Congratulations! You never saw it coming. Consider yourself lucky that there was no suffering. Not even the cockroaches survived.

Two miles from a target, even with a weedy bomb I'm toast.

Yea, needs more work to make most of those variables automatic. I'm a survivor unless the Russinas really hate Middlesborough (which would be understanable).

I don't get that at all. I'm confused. What's the whole 'cities of x population' variable about, and the number?

Looks like a targeting index of some sort. The more aggressive the strike, the smaller the population of the urban conurbation needs to be before it's targeted. It's also assuming they'd only use one device per target, so London would only get one of whatever warhead you chose.

According to that the nearest target to my house would be Nelson, Lancs.

Why would anyone nuke Nelson? For the Chippy?

Alive! but do you want to be?
You live in the middle of no where or are lucky.

slough = heathrow plus major road junction. pretty smart

I live in cheltenham, surely GCHQ would be on a list of locations for a terrorist.

Cheery little website wasn't it?

I thought terrorists were swarthy men with backbacks these days?

This seems to be airdropped ordnance, i.e. a foreign power.

This seems to be airdropped ordnance, i.e. a foreign power.

It's harking back to the good old days when cartoon entertainment used to consist of nuclear armageddon.

[img] http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSGn92X_67fX3xmQVNDWhgFcg2XPg7UcM-JEzP9-an26Xu1UZmh7Q [/img]