Forum menu
Full sus trail bike...
 

[Closed] Full sus trail bike with a long top tube?

Posts: 1831
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#3665948]

I have now ridden a fair few frames but for some reason they all seem to follow the trait of having very short top tubes.

I am currently on a Ragley MmmBop but looking to upgrade to a full sus in the not too distant future. (Went back to hardtail a year ago and regret it!)

What full sus trail bikes out there have fairly long top tubes? I'm bored of all this short top tube malarkey now!


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 3:45 am
Posts: 6859
Free Member
 

Yetis have massive top tubes compared to almost anything else I've found.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 6:05 am
Posts: 22
Free Member
 

Trek fuel ex are pretty long too


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 7:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yetis have massive top tubes compared to almost anything else I've found. 8)

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 7:25 am
Posts: 219
Free Member
 

Most people go down one frame size on a Yeti as they are long.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 7:35 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

How tall are you and what length do you need? Whyte 146 in a large has a 624mm top tube


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 7:43 am
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Specialized? My old Enduro has a lovely long top tube in addition to being quite low to the ground too. It's usefully longer than my (large) Wolf Ridge.

I don't like short top tubes much either, the benefits of snappy handling are more than offset when you smack your knees on the shifters pedalling up hills. I'm not massively tall at 5' 11" but I seem to get on better with longer bikes too.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 8:31 am
Posts: 9440
Full Member
 

My Enduro SL was very long in the top tube compared to my current bike.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 8:43 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My whyte e120 had a long top tube compared to other bikes I have owned


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 8:48 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Gary fisher (I think)


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 8:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+ 1 for Specialized, Canyon also come up big


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 8:58 am
Posts: 1676
Free Member
 

What size & travel are you thinking? Budget?
5'11" as above, Scott's & Giant's are either too small in medium or too big in large.
I have a Turner DW Flux in large which fits well, but would also look at Trek Fuel EX.
Really depends what your after, a Santa Cruz Heckler is shorter than a Blur XC so it depends what your after.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 9:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cotic Rocket?


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 9:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Another for specialized. I had a 2009 Stumpy FSR and it had a pretty long top tube.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 9:28 am
Posts: 17846
Full Member
 

As already mentioned, Specialized & Trek.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 9:54 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Have a large 575 and noticed the difference straight away compared to my old large sized enduro..


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 10:51 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Forget about the stated sizes (S, M, L) and look at the actual frame dimensons on the bikes you're interested in.

I went for a large Foxy last year (I'm usually medium) to get a longer TT.

Because Mondrakers all have very low standover I could ride it fine despite having shortish legs.

Just a thought.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 10:58 am
 br
Posts: 18125
Free Member
 

A friend has bought a Yeti SB66 based upon many demo's, he's over 6' and a lanky build (same as me). He found many of the bikes he rode short - esp. Santa Cruz's.

I had an older Enduro (06), found that short too.

I would demo lots if I was you.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 11:10 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

Agree about Yetis, Cotic Rocket, also Orange's are nicely long, ST4 + five.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 11:33 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cannondale


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 11:34 am
Posts: 10341
Free Member
 

A lot of bikes with dropped top tubes for low standover (with the mast or gusset to the seat tube), can be up-sized without any penalty.
Turners for example. They mostly just get longer with larger sizes.


 
Posted : 11/02/2012 11:38 am