Forum menu
does this bike exis...
 

[Closed] does this bike exist

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#1725350]

want to build a bike 110-120 rear travel, 130-140 front, slack head angle 68degrees ish but with a low bb 13 inches and a 23.5 ish top tube?

so is there a bike out there to do it that doesn't weigh a ton?


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 2:48 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Most bikes weight is a result of the type of riding they're designed to do.

What you're describing sounds more at the 'play' end of the spectrum and you'd probably find a bike would be proportionately heavy to cope.

Would help if you could say a) what you want it for and b) hoe much a 'ton' is?


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

I'd have thought a Spesh Stumpy or a Trek Fuel Ex (among others) would fit that bill, although I don't know about TT length!


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 2:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Doesn't that Cube in the latest mag fit the description (possibly not the forks)?


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 2:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Orange Blood would tick all those boxes but it may be heavier than you would like. Again, it depends on what you mean by 'weighing a ton'. Sub 30lbs should be achievable and would be what I call 'weighing less than a ton'.

Pretty much any bike built with 4x or Slopestyle in mind would also tick that box, e.g. Commencal Meta 4x, Transition Bottlerocket, Mythic Rampant etc.

If you're deadly serious about getting something that is 100% what you want though with that brief, the Nicolai could customise a Helius AC for you but you'll pay handsomely for the priviledge.

*Edit* Those 4x bikes won't have TTs as long as 23.5" but they wouldn't be too far off if you get the in their invariably named 'long' size.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 2:57 pm
Posts: 15
Full Member
 

Cotic?


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:02 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

Hustler? I don't know.....


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Banshee Spitfire is 127mm rear travel, adjustable head angle but not sure of the TT


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:05 pm
Posts: 12148
Free Member
 

TT will depend on frame size. The Hustlers about that in med and large. BB height is 'about' 13"
Not bad for a bloke that jey-lite.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:07 pm
Posts: 10498
Free Member
 

Nicolai Helius CC with custom frame geo option, 90 - 130 out back, upto 140 up front, can be built to weigh 26lbs easily - kinda pricey though 😉


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Banshee Spitfire is 127mm rear travel, adjustable head angle but not sure of the TT

That's absolutely the bike you want mate! Forgot it existed.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:15 pm
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

Worth looking at a Cotic Hemlock (medium or large) - fits the bill apart from maybe the BB being a bit higher than you're after. I was worried that it was higher than I wanted but it has been fine, probably helped by running quite a bit of rear sag (30+%).

1.5 headtube means you could use angle adjuster headset to slacken it further, which apparently has the additional side effect of lowering the BB a bit too. I'm quite tempted to try it.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:19 pm
Posts: 4
Free Member
 

I've just stripped a Kona Dawg frame that I was running in a similar configuration- 140mm Pikes on the front and 100mm travel at the rear. It rode brilliantly like that. I don't know the weight of the frame but its a 17" with a TT of 23.3cm or similar.

The frame was intended for 100mm forks so the 140mm slackened it out nicely, no idea what the resulting HA was, but it rode brilliantly and was great on climbing yet confidence inspiring on the descents.

[img] [/img]

pic from flikr

as I say, I've just stripped it down to move the parts on to something with more travel and will be putting it up for sale soon once I've given it a clean.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:29 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I'm playing with a hustler at the minute that is pretty close if a bit heavier that I would like, Ideally I'd like it to be a 7lb ish 26/27lb bike frame, mainly for riding more technical xc than anything jumpy or droppy


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Banshee Spitfire springs to my mind too. Long, low, slack, light, right travel. Looks very good on paper.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:38 pm
Posts: 3775
Free Member
 

thinking a full suss 4x bike like the Commie Meta 4x (in long)


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

sssimon - Member

want to build a bike 110-120 rear travel, 130-140 front, slack head angle 68degrees ish but with a low bb 13 inches and a 23.5 ish top tube?

so is there a bike out there to do it that doesn't weigh a ton?

sounds like my Cotic Hemlock, i'm not sure on the BB height - i've never measured it, but i still clout the odd rock so it isn't silly high.

s'good for wheelies too...


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

even a long 4x bike is 22.5 at best and a meta 4x is in the weighs a ton category.

custom nicolai it is then..................


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:49 pm
 st
Posts: 1445
Full Member
 

I looked at this a while back too. Seems to me that there is a gap for people who want a short travel frame with a longer fork. Something along the lines of a Cotic Soul but with some bounce at the back.

The Hemlock seems to be one possibility but I've had one of them and wanted something else.

I've ended up going with a Meta 4.2 and stuck my Pikes on it. Seems fine so far.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:49 pm
 J0N
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Sounds like mine. Norco fluid set on short travel. No pics unfortunately.
Spesh FSR XC with longer forks?


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

had a meta 4 with a 130 mm rev and it was close but not a great riding bike


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:54 pm
Posts: 406
Free Member
 

How about an Orange ST4?


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Like my Anthem X with 130mm Dt Swiss Forks... But it's not stiff and slack as I'd like.

Orange ST4? *beaten to it*


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 3:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

st 4 with a 2010 rev at 130m would be pretty close too I reckon, concerned it would have that dead meta feel but that might have been down to it being a heavy frame


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 406
Free Member
 

For some reason I didn't think about my own bike! - Nicolai Helius AC.

Adjustable 120-150mm on back, not too heavy, 140-150mm fork up front.

I run the 120mm at the back and Pikes. Slack at the front, low BB. Great fun. Not cheap though!


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 4:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Chumba VF2 isn't far away from what your talking about.. 127mm rear travel and takes a long fork .. up to 160 at the front.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 4:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

SSimon - sounds like the 4x idea is a non-starter then. The custom Nic would be soooo cool although to be honest, the Helius AC in stock form is going to do what you ask. The large comes in at around 23.3" for the TT, sub 13" for the BB and can be set to offer 120mm of travel and still work with a 140mm fork. The HA with a 140mm fork is going to be around 67.5-68 degrees, right were you want it.
The only thing I would customise is the seat tube; I'd ask for a large frame but with the seat tube from a medium or small; that way you get the length without the height of the ST. It doesn't give you any more clerance but it does allow you to drop the saddle lower and stops the bike looking like a gate.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 4:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Shame on you Ferrit! ANy chance you can post a picture of your AC?


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 4:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Large size is 600mm top tube = 23.6"

BB height very much depends where you're measuring from - Nicolai measure relative to the axles which are fixed points but not sure how you're measuring 13".

On the AC BB is +11mm and doesn't change when you adjust the rear travel (but should always be run with a 140-150mm fork).

You might also want to look at the CC where adjusting the rear travel *does* affect the angles and BB height. CC bb height is 14mm and measurements are based on a 130mm fork. Dropping the rear travel one notch (to about 115m) would lower the BB and slacken the head angle. Adjusting the fork to 140mm will slacken it another 0.5 degrees.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 4:17 pm
Posts: 406
Free Member
 

geetee - here you go. This is in middle travel setting - 130mm. Options are 120/ 133/ 146 mm.

And yes, I'm a lanky beanpole!

More info here too:

http://www.nicolai.net/products/e-frames/e-helius-ac.html#heliusac

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 5:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

my 07 trance is 4.2" rear, 130 revs up front, head angle is 70.5 standard but the extra 30mm in the forks tips that back to 69 ish. low bb too.
the large size (which looks like a gate apparently) has a top tube in the range you want...


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 5:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Chumba VF2 is 127mm at the rear with a 68 HA at 140mm with a 13.5" BB height and will weight between 28-30lb with a reasonable spec.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 7:10 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

sssimon - Member

"want to build a bike 110-120 rear travel, 130-140 front, slack head angle 68degrees ish but with a low bb 13 inches and a 23.5 ish top tube?"

Sounds like a Hemlock to me as well. Bb slightly higher than you're after, 13.5 with 130mm fork. 68.5 degrees HA and 23.25 TT for a medium. I've got no objectivity at all, I love mine to bits, I can take it for XC rides or razz round glentress or mince my way down the fort william DH course on it and it just gets on with business.

If you wanted to get the lower BB and slacker head angle a HA reducer headset would make it almost bang on what you're after I think. But it's very close as standard.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 46086
Free Member
 

ST4 is a tad on the shorter travel of that, but would be on the money for weight, handling and FUN!


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 7:40 pm
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

The Spitfire could be very slightly slacker than you want at the front, but its very close to what you've described. With two shock positions and a range of options for lower headset cups you would be able to fiddle about until you got it the way you wanted it. You might not be miles off your target weight either, mine is 30lbs with flats, without trying too hard at all.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 7:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Get a Spitfire!!!

Mine is 29lbs and a bit.


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 8:04 pm
 AJ
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Matches a SC blur 4x me thinks [url= http://www.santacruzbikes.co.uk/site2009/bicycles_archive/geom/blur4x.html ]4x geo[/url]

I have a large ano silver frame for sale (with xt front mech and spare dropout and HV rp23)

£600

mail me Andytoop@hotmail.com


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 8:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

prophet sl


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 8:51 pm
 AJ
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

did i say Blur 4x


 
Posted : 21/06/2010 9:37 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thread resurrection...

Meta 4.2 with 140mm fork?


 
Posted : 26/08/2010 8:47 am