maybe from the apple cross side itd be steeper ....even the missus found it a pleasent enough climb......n she was craping her self about it .
I'm sure all the willy wavers reckon they're far fitter and faster than me, but I've walked up a climb. I wasn't fit for me at the time, but still far from unfit - had been in the top 20% of finishers at a sportive shortly before. Was a fairly sustained 1:5 after 50 miles or so and I just didn't have low enough gears.
I have triple on my commuter (with panniers) and on my Carbon race bike. When racing the limit screw is adjusted so only 2 are useable but when I goto the Alps all three there and used. Not that many beat me on hills as I spin up. Have ridden most of the big tour climbs over the past 15 years. Overtaken twice and actually able o enjoy the experience. I could not ride up on a double. Triple all the way.
Mike WW
They were definately pushing up Bwlch y Groes (the one they tested spitfires on) and a couple did say that they wanted my triple!
Gilly C - MemberMike WW
They were definately pushing up Bwlch y Groes (the one they tested spitfires on) and a couple did say that they wanted my triple!
Don't doubt there were people walking. My point was that they couldn't have been fit roadies. I thought I was reasonably fit until I started riding with some proper roadies and was/still am humbled.
But anyway, I think some people are getting confused between what they think is willy waving and honest experience.
I honestly don't care what people ride or how slow or fast they might be. Its simply that a 34/25(27) ratio gets you up anything I and many others have come across.Want more or touring with panniers or you want to spin get a triple really doesn't make any odds
Although I've mountain biked for a couple of years I've only ridden road bikes for 6 months and raced cyclocross for less. In reality the proper race orientated roadies I ride/train with don't give a stuff about what you wear/what you ride and to a fair extent even how quick you are.I think its easy to confuse these people with all the gear no idea posers perhaps?
If you want I can ask an aquaintance of mine (who is a team pro rider) what he thinks of the question?
juan did you used to be in SUMBC?? I know rich farley and tim etc was president year before Rich.
ANy advice greatly recieved!
aracer - im pro triple despite the above. as you state doesnt matter how fit you are ... if your pace is wrong and/or the ride is a long un you will benefit from it ...
all im stating is that bealach isnt as hard(and no i didnt use my triple ..39:23) as the reputation it seems to have gained - there are much harder climbs to ride
[i]its nice to be able to ride up a 25% after 200k with some tough climbs in with 100k and further climbs still to go.[/i]
Of course it is. That's what 39x25 is for. 😉
Any climb is hard if you've ridden over 150miles, this question can only be answered by getting to the root of the problem, how far do you expect to ride. Do you expect to keep riding when you have hit the grovel mode, if you dont then a double will be fine.
Andy yes I was in the SUMBC in the golden age of rich tim andy and simon.
Speaking to the lbs they are pro triple all the way (but then I live somewhere where road are all steep) in my opinion I think it's better to have the granny option. Even if you dont use it you'll have it for this moment (you know the one you're going to suffer when you'll be over 3500 m of climb and your leg will be heavy and hard to spin).
If I were you I'll go for a triple with a 27. But then I am very pragmatic.
