Forum menu
Conti Mountain King...
 

[Closed] Conti Mountain King - weak side knobs?

 Earl
Posts: 1902
Free Member
Topic starter
 
[#2269928]

Tried one on the front on the frozen but rough ground today. Felt like there was no off camber /leaning the bike over grip at all. Is this a typical frozen ground thing or just MKs in general?


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 11:01 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

old or new mountain kings?


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 11:05 pm
 Earl
Posts: 1902
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Old

Just looked up the new ones - they look completely different. Is that saying something?


 
Posted : 09/12/2010 11:19 pm
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

Of all the various things I disliiked about mountain kings that wasn't one.

The new MK is very different but then the old one's pretty old so that's no surprise, Conti have learned some tricks since hten.


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 12:36 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If the ground is properly frozen then the rubber knobs on a tyre won't dig in - you'd need ice spikes!


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 10:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

MK's are designed for harder packed trails with some loose stuff, it's going to be hard to find anything to grip on rough frozen ground if you hit it at speed - ran 2.4 MK's in the Alps last year and had no problem with bendy side nobs (oooo er)


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 10:21 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

MKs work well when there is something for the spiky nobs to stick in to. So soft ground is best or loose over hard. Not frozen solid.


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 11:09 am
Posts: 1097
Full Member
 

They came as OE on a bike i bought this year and I thought they were very poor tyres, little grip and very little confidence when pushed in a corner.


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 11:41 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

scotabroad - Member

"They came as OE on a bike i bought this year and I thought they were very poor tyres, little grip and very little confidence when pushed in a corner. "

The OE spec ones are very poor... To be fair they're not alone, OE Nevegals are mince too and I'm sure there's others. I reckon you need the black chili versions to get adequate performance out of the old Mountain King and even then they're not particularily great.


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 7:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I didn't get on with the 2.2s but the 2.4s are better. The new MKs look like better for what i'm after.


 
Posted : 10/12/2010 10:40 pm
Posts: 386
Full Member
 

The new MK 2.4 is pretty good I find. The race kings are rubbish though, one came with my bike and I tore all the sidewall on my third ride. Made out of paper I think.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 12:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

black chilli mountain kings don't half wear fast tho.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 12:50 am
Posts: 66111
Full Member
 

"TandemJeremy - Member

black chilli mountain kings don't half wear fast tho."

Dunno about that, they weren't good enough to stay on my bike for more than a few weeks :mrgreen: Went back to my nevegals, cheaper and better.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 1:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Got em cheap second hand and quite impressed - especailly grippy on wet grassa nd that sort of thing.- but the rear is not going to last a thousand miles which is a bit poor.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 1:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Which one have they renamed them 'Baron' now?


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 9:37 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Baron is a new tyre, bit of a scaled down Rain King.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 11:35 am
Posts: 1193
Free Member
 

I stopped using old style mountain kings for this very reason - completely in contrast to TandemJeremy i found them lethal on wet grass and anything that required the edges to bite hard. I never had enough confidence in the front to hold on. They were nice and fat though.


 
Posted : 11/12/2010 2:41 pm