Forum menu
Carbon 456 - Any re...
 

[Closed] Carbon 456 - Any reason not to?

Posts: 66112
Full Member
 

flow - Member

Im not saying you will find it there, but thats what they have done.

Ah- so catalogues exist, therefore, this must be in a catalogue? To prove it, here is a link to a catalogue which doesn't have this frame in.

I have to say, you're not very good at this.


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 11:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Theyr'e pretty much all built the using the formula from taiwan ,its just got On Ones geometry which is like it or hate it or just accept it.Believe the On One marketing if you want at least your not paying a premium for it.


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 11:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Flow - you're talking shit, stop it.

OP - The frame is awesome, you won't find better for the money. It looks shit if you build it up with skinny forks, xc kit and skinny tyres. So don't. Put Lyrics, short stem, wide bars and Rubber Queens on and it'll look awesome. I've got quite a few bikes and this is one of the cheapest and one of my favourites.


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 11:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I must be very tight because i consider £400 on a hardtail frame to be expensive...if i was going to take a punt on carbon i'd get one of these:

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Full-Carbon-3K-Mountain-Bike-MTB-17-Frame-Headset-/370529734698?pt=UK_sportsleisure_cycling_bikeparts_SR&hash=item56454b102a#ht_1585wt_1139

£169 + £45 postage


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 11:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've never seen a cheap Chinese frame on ebay with the kind of geometry On One sell. Its all 71/73 old fashioned XC angles and certainly not even close to the kind of angles on the 456. And I doubt many of them can take a big fork etc etc.

R&D for a hardtail ain't all that when the Taiwanese factory already has the tech and the labour. If it was the exclusive domain of the big boys why are there so many niche frame builders out there?


 
Posted : 23/08/2011 11:07 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

Is it just me who's left with a mental image of flow spending the night searching Chinese carbon catalogues on his phone for a frame with on-one geometry and dropouts just so he can 'prove' that c456's weren't designed by on-one who had specific moulds made up to build them?


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:18 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

People will point and laugh at its ugliness.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:19 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I imagine Flow was to busy frothing at the mouth and maniacally hand-wringing to search for [i]anything..[/i]


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:20 am
 flow
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You would be wrong then, I dont care, I didnt buy one. Northwind however, I recon he might be halfway through by now.

I dont need to prove anything, but I think its in Brants best interets to prove me wrong.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:26 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

it's imbecilic. Imagine getting up at the morning for a ride and seeing that in the garage - you'd go back to bed

This made me chuckle. 🙂

It's a pretty "striking" bike, that's for sure...


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:29 am
Posts: 310
Free Member
 

(OK, when I take it to fort william it's getting bigger wheels and tougher tyres!)

When you do this please post the date you're going or drop me a line, I'd like to make sure I'm there to watch. Thanks.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:41 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I dont need to prove anything, but I think its in Brants best interets to prove me wrong.

Yes you do need to prove it, becasue we all know you're talking bollox, and we all want to see you keep tripping yourself up time after time.....
And I can imagine Brant isn't really that bothered about proving you wrong being as you're the only one with this delusion....

😛


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:45 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

Stop making a prat of yourself flow.

And Houns, the one link of yours I clicked on had a 71deg head angle. Did you find any with similar geometry to the C456 or were you just looking for carbon hardtails? If so I don't know what you think you're proved.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:51 am
 flow
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You fools believe what you want and keep riding your cheap chinese knock offs 😆


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:56 am
Posts: 17848
Full Member
 

Just wondering, are these 'far East' frames the same as 'far East' car tyres that look just like some modern tyre designs and appear to have aggressive, sporty tread patterns but are in fact utter cak in use??


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 8:56 am
Posts: 1014
Free Member
 

if anyone can show me a knock off carbon frame that can take 160 mm forks i'd be interested...


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 


(OK, when I take it to fort william it's getting bigger wheels and tougher tyres!)

When you do this please post the date you're going or drop me a line, I'd like to make sure I'm there to watch. Thanks.

taking a c456 to fort bill doesn't sound even the slightest bit unreasonable to me.. there's plenty of evidence of people (real men)downhilling hardtails.. and I'm sure I've seen enough photographic and anecdotal evidence of people downhilling on steel 456s.. why would the c456 which has undergone the same rigorous CEN testing fair any worse..?


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:16 am
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

And I can imagine Brant isn't really that bothered about proving you wrong being as you're the only one with this delusion....

😉


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:23 am
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

the frames will be sold to other direct sales companies the world over.

they aren't.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:24 am
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]Just wondering, are these 'far East' frames the same as 'far East' car tyres[/i]

Errr, no.

The vast majority of carbon frames are made in the Far East.

I found the other day that for Biancchi etc to put 'Made in Italy' on their frames they have to add at least 50% to the value of the frame on Italian soil. So they buy their frames 'raw' from China and have them sprayed in Italy. They argue that spraying the name of the brand on the frame increases it's value by more than 50% so they can then put the sticker on it.

On-One/P-X have never made any pretence of doing anything other than designing stuff in the UK and having it manufactured in the Far East. They do this well and order sufficient volume to keep prices down and allow them to afford to be able to have specific jigs and moulds made where necessary.

To suggest they are rebadging 'off the shelf' frames is, I think, really poor - they may not always make frames that everyone likes but they are doign it honestly.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:26 am
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

They're now specialising in bulk spot buying which is great for buyers but IMHO don't try and make your business bigger until you've satisfied the customers got/lost.

Thank you for noting our recent move to daily deals. I claim it was Jules' idea, but he says it was mine. I think he got it off Mike at Sports Direct.

The good thing about Daily Deals is that it isn't the only thing you can concentrate on, and believe me, comments about our showroom's shortfalls are taken VERY seriously. We've improved manpower in there, are continuing to do so.

I still haven't got a C456, even with the new headset, but I'm only riding my El Guapo right now, even though some bloke on mtbr says that its awful - http://forums.mtbr.com/8375009-post12.html


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:29 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

I dont need to prove anything, but I think its in Brants best interets to prove me wrong.

of course not you just need to make broad sweeping statements about the design of a bike and how it was created. Once you have done this only a moron would expect you , of all people, to actually have some evidence of it being factually accurate. In fact the reasonable thing when you make an outrageous claim is to just ask someone to disprove it
Do you want Brant to deny that Elvis deigned it as well? On - one did not fake the moon landings?
You are a very good troll though.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:29 am
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

Carbon frames are mostly made in CHINA.

This is because, though it's very technical, in terms of material, the majority of the actual process to make a frame is quite low tech. It's a bit like stuffing envelopes or making christmas crackers at your dining table.

China has lower cost for manual labour. That's the long and short of it - so that's where the carbon manufacturing industry is concentrated.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:32 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought you found the idea of carbon frames a bit disgusting, brant 🙂


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:38 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My mates selling his one over on BikeRadar
[url= http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12797298 ]Carbon 456[/url]


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:42 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Any reason not to?

It's plastic - and plastic frames just will not do for me. It's not right, I tell you.

Oh, and they are very ugly as others have mentioned. Ugly as sin.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:45 am
Posts: 7563
Free Member
 

I thought you found the idea of carbon frames a bit disgusting, brant

I think I said they "had no soul" didn't I?

They are very disarming in a "light" and "strong" and "tough" way. A bit like the weird kid in the corner at school.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:47 am
Posts: 13869
Free Member
 

Looks shouldn't matter, if the performance is right.

I was still saying that when I decided against the C456 and paid an extra £81 for a Soul.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:53 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

You fools believe what you want and keep riding your cheap chinese knock offs

Gee thanks. Now I've got permission I'll carry on enjoying my 2 On Ones. I thought I was going to have to heave them in a skip for a while there....

What do you ride? Overpriced boutique frames knitted from fairy dust by a one legged Rastafarian Eskimo?


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But looks do matter George, otherwise Brad Pitt wouldn't get near a script, would he? 😉


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm pretty sure you said "disgusting" but I think that the intent was the same either way 😉

The Carbon 456 in human form

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 9:56 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You haven't changed much clubber.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:01 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

😉

I got a bit taller, that's it.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:02 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Because you can't recycle it


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:03 am
Posts: 194
Free Member
 

Thank you for noting our recent move to daily deals. I claim it was Jules' idea, but he says it was mine. I think he got it off Mike at Sports Direct.

The good thing about Daily Deals is that it isn't the only thing you can concentrate on, and believe me, comments about our showroom's shortfalls are taken VERY seriously. We've improved manpower in there, are continuing to do so.

I have just taken myself off the mailing list as I couldn't cope with the daily deals. Only a matter of time before I bought something I didn't need, just because it was cheap!


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:07 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

When can us short-arses get a 14 inch frame then please ?


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:08 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
 

When can us short-arses get a 14 inch frame then please ?

Just order one from one of Flow's catalogues for a fraction of the cost!


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:10 am
Posts: 310
Free Member
 

Yunki, take a deep breath and untwist your knickers.

taking a c456 to fort bill doesn't sound even the slightest bit unreasonable to me.. there's plenty of evidence of people (real men)downhilling hardtails.. and I'm sure I've seen enough photographic and anecdotal evidence of people downhilling on steel 456s.. why would the c456 which has undergone the same rigorous CEN testing fair any worse..?

I never said or mentioned unreasonable anywhere. You [i]thought[/i] I inferred it was unreasonable but that wasn't my point. I'm aware that 'real men' have ridden hardtails down fort william. I'd still like to watch NW ride his C456 down though. Interested to see if he rides it down in ernest like a bike should be ridden or if he slow-rolls it down winding in and out of every available smooth bit and avoiding the rough. Reading some of his posts NW sounds like he rides hard and/or as you would say like a 'real man' (ref a recent post I read about him surprising downhillers on an uplift at Inners on his hardtail) so the result might tell me a lot about the C456, which i'd maybe consider buying depending on how that turns out.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:13 am
Posts: 13869
Free Member
 

But looks do matter George, otherwise Brad Pitt wouldn't get near a script, would he?

Laugh all you want, Gary. I've carried the burden of Brad Pitt-like looks for years, and often struggled to be taken seriously as a result.

*cough*


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

From what I read getting a carbon frame to pass CEN is easy


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:16 am
Posts: 80
Full Member
 

Why so anti China and the Far East?

I don't think anyone complains that [url= http://www.mcconaghyboats.com/ ]these boats[/url] are made in China...


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yunki, take a deep breath and untwist your knickers.

sorry.. day three nicotine withdrawal and the blind unwavering faith that only an on-one owner can understand have left me itching for an argument after this thread..

knickers duly untwisted.. I'd like to see that day too for the exactly the same reasons.. video evidence would be ace
churz.. 🙂


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

This is an amusing thread indeed 🙂 They are butt ugly though.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:25 am
Posts: 41849
Free Member
 

Elvis designed the c456?

What I want to know is, will there be an aluminium version? Carbon/Ti weight for steel money?


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

16 stone, 6ft 5, 20" C456 with 32 Talas forks (this one as it happens, though its had a few bits added since then)

http://www.on-one.co.uk/readers-rides/your-ride/q/514111508_andy-lyle46_carbon-tara

I use it for everything from 8 hour adventure races to as close as I get to downhill to arsing about on the jumps at my local trails. And it works on them all so far.

Drop the forks to 4" and it climbs well and descends like a classic xc bike. Bang them out to 6" and it spills your pint and offers you out to the car park. Ok, not really, but it does encourage you to ride lika a hooligan, looking for drops and potential air time.

To answer the OP's question, if you like or dont care about the looks and dont have any of the fork compatability issues, then I can think of no reason why not.


 
Posted : 24/08/2011 10:32 am
Page 2 / 3