Forum menu
Broken PACE 303 / 3...
 

[Closed] Broken PACE 303 / 305 Warranty?

Posts: 0
Topic starter
Translate โ–ผ
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Bought a PACE 303 just after they came out, roughly Oct 2006. Lasted about 7 months before breaking at seat tube. PACE warranty kicked in & received updated 305 about 5 months later.
Ran 305 until current date. Suffered terrible chain suck which began to mark chain stay, fabricated 'baked bean can' chain stay protector.
Recently noticed a crack on the non-chain stay side, checked under 'baked bean can' also broken.
Conclusion - Chain suck weakened chain stay broke; baked bean can held it together. Stresses on non-chain stay excessive and then broke.
Comment - Frame suffers abnormal chain suck, bad design? (New model has built in anti chain suck device).
HELP / IDEAS / COMMENT - Should I just put this down to experience. Should a hardtail frame last longer than 3 1/2 years. Have I any warranty claim or issue due to bad design (I think 2 year warranty on paper).
Thanks in anticipation.


 
Posted : 12/07/2010 12:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Translate โ–ผ
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Never had any chainsuck damage problems on my 303 though mine did snap at the seat tube/gusset weld like most...

I think you have to accept that this is just bad luck - you won't have any luck with warranty (even if it was inside the 2 years since chainsuck is clearly your fault, not theirs) though it's always worth asking Pace very nicely if they do replacements as most brands will do a cheap (cost + VAT ish) replacement for out of warranty frames.


 
Posted : 12/07/2010 12:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Translate โ–ผ
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Quite a bit of recent-ish Pace "warranty" talk on here if you do a search. I think the general conclusion was that you may have better luck extracting some blood from a stone.


 
Posted : 12/07/2010 12:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Translate โ–ผ
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Yeah - longish thread here

http://www.singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/noooo-bike-frames-busted


 
Posted : 12/07/2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 41395
Free Member
Translate โ–ผ
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Chainsuck due to components rather than frame Shirley?


 
Posted : 12/07/2010 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Translate โ–ผ
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

[i]Should a hardtail frame last longer than 3 1/2 years[/i]

YES


 
Posted : 12/07/2010 1:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Translate โ–ผ
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Comment - Frame suffers abnormal chain suck, bad design? (New model has built in anti chain suck device).

In my experience, yes, definitely. Although I take cynic-al's point that components and set-up can help mitigate, or worsen, the problem.

Also, 5 months to receive a warranty replacement first time around?!?


 
Posted : 12/07/2010 1:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Translate โ–ผ
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

No, the frame has nothing to do with chainsuck happening (eg the chain not releasing from the chainring). The frame's design (low clearance between rings and chainstays) means that if you get chainsuck, the effect will likely be bad. An important distinction and one you may argue about as poor design but then you could argue that about all sorts of things. What it doesn't do is make it a warranty claim.


 
Posted : 12/07/2010 1:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Translate โ–ผ
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
 

Clubber - yes, that was my point, the poor design worsens the effect of getting chainsuck, bacause of the low clearance between rings and chainstays. Also agree that it's not a warranty claim - and I didn't even consider it would be when this happened to my frame.


 
Posted : 12/07/2010 1:30 pm