Forum menu
Are there actually ...
 

[Closed] Are there actually any fun 4” sus frames?

 st
Posts: 1445
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#2883416]

More a musing than looking to buy one but it’s something I have looked at before.

There are plenty of lightweight, racey, fast paced looking 100mm travel frames around but what about one that you can run a longer fork on and just arse about with?

I had a Hemlock a while back but didn’t get on with it. I also had a Meta 4 but this was too long and lardy and with 140mm Pikes on seemed a bit of a chore.

The only option that really stands out is for a 4X frame but then you’re compromising on a frame that you can actually ride distances.

So if you ride a BFe, Apline (Dialled) or something like that but want a bit of travel at the back (but not too much) what options are there?


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

orange blood or st4, banshee spitfire (ish), cannondale rize


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I dont think anything exists but if something did then I'd probably buy it. 4x frames would be perfect but they usually only have a 16inch seat tube (max) which isnt ideal for putting the saddle up high with.

Someone mentioned a pivot mach 4 the other day, dont know what they are but worth looknig aT?


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:08 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

older trance.

ran one for YEARS with 5" forks on front. sexy fun.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nicolai Helius CC - adjustable down to 88, 102, 118, 129mm. It will become slacker with a lower bb when at the lower rear travel settings with a longer fork.

Alternatively the current Helius AC with a 50mm stroke shock can be run at 106mm at the rear.

I have to say my CC which is fitted with a Talas 140 fork is superb.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:12 pm
Posts: 6317
Full Member
 

pivot mach 4

There's your answer.

Having said that, I've got a 100mm Pronghorn, and that's tremendous fun in a how-am-I-still-intact? kinda way. I ride it on all sorts of terrain.

EDIT: Also, the Morewood Zula takes bigger forks (my buddy runs 100-130mm? Revs) and is built like a brick shitehouse.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:15 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

been running a cannondale rush and a 130mm revelation for a while and it's a keeper. Most 100mm bikes end up with a silly high bb once you start adding fork length.

fork at 120mm in the pic

[url= http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5058/5525581739_1278eccea2_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5058/5525581739_1278eccea2_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/35180712@N03/5525581739/ ]rush5[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/35180712@N03/ ]simon gardiner[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:15 pm
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

At risk of becoming a parrot over it, have you checked out the [url= http://singletrackworld.com/reviews/long-termers-benji%e2%80%99s-pivot-mach-4-7/ ]Pivot Mach 4[/url]? There soon to be released M4X (yes it's a 4X version) of the same frame looks to have major potential.

Along with the SC Superlight, surprisingly tough, though more at home as "bruiser" with 120mm up front.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:17 pm
Posts: 8401
Full Member
 

Rift Zone? 4" travel but built for trails more than racing from what I gather. I've no idea how it would handle longer forks.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why are you all listing lightweight xc frames?

They arent going to survive jumps/drops/dh tracks.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:22 pm
Posts: 9043
Free Member
 

Standard answer from me - track down a Blur 4X. I had a Soul for a couple of years but wanted something that would take more of a beating, allow me to run bigger forks (had a trip to the Alps looming too) but pedal like a hardtail and be ok for long days in the saddle. Blur ticked all the boxes.

Run mine with 160mm 36 Floats, doesn't feel wander-ey at all. Ever. 70mm stem, 760mm bars, Joplin 3, 1x9 setup etc. Its superb. Really, really superb.

I'm a bit of a serial bike swapper but every time I get itchy feet with the Blur, I look at what else there is out there to replace it with and/or go for a ride on it and change my mind.

Well worth trying to track one down if you can. Mines a medium and I'm 5'8" - wouldn't want to be any taller on a medium. The large is about the same height but an inch longer I think...


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:24 pm
Posts: 9043
Free Member
 

Oh, BTW, the ONLY frame/bike I've seen I'd like to have a go on with a view to changing my Blur, is the GT Distortion. Looks awesome.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Infact, I used to have the ideal bike myself. 2003 specialized supercross, it was a bit small for me for xc stuff though but it was good fun and heavy (so it must have been strong)


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yeh that GT looks ok. The saracen ariel looks ok too but its got an inch too much travel


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:26 pm
 st
Posts: 1445
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Like I say it's not a plan to buy one (although it could be the start of a slippery slope). At the moment I have a BFe which is ace but there are times when a bit of squish would be good to take the edge of things and to ease my slightly shonky back. When I've built up frames like Hecklers etc they've ended up seeming a bit overkill and I have a DH bike for days on our downhill courses.

Threads I've read about Superlights and so on seem to suggest they are much happier running 100mm forks with all round ground covering builds.

At the moment I have a hardtail which rides well downhill, works on big days out and will fail long after I do on more severe trails.

Seems a shame that Cotic didn't develop the Hemlock idea further, ho hum.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:28 pm
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

[i]They arent going to survive jumps/drops/dh tracks. [/i]

Where did he say "fun = jumps/drops/dh"?
That and any number of these lightweight frame listed above will quite happily survive jumps/drops/dh.

and again parroting... SL works well with 120mm forks as a trailbike, but is a race machine @ 100mm IMHO of course..


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:30 pm
Posts: 2335
Free Member
 

There arent many that dont have horrible racey type geometry..

but
Transition double
commencal absolute
Mythic rampant


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:34 pm
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

the ragley fs is 100/150, not sure when it's due though.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:34 pm
Posts: 13291
Free Member
 

no, not a cannondale rize.

i spent the last six monts riding one and can not vouch for it as a hooligan bike.

i'd go for a Liteville 301 [img] [/img]

can be built up with various rear ends giving between 100 - 150mm of travel. will take a 100 - 170mm fork.

light and stiff as buggery. bit pricey, though.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:37 pm
Posts: 25940
Full Member
 

tracknicko - Member
older trance.

Agree - seem pretty overbuilt for a xc bike, so ideal for pissing about in the woods (have people broken them often ?) and ride better with a 130/140 fork than the 100-120 suggested. BB is pretty low so they take the longer fork well.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 12:41 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

2003 specialized supercross, it was a bit small for me for xc stuff though but it was good fun and heavy (so it must have been strong)

great bikes but I snapped two sets of chainstays.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ive had 3 trances. never broke any.

well not in a catasrophic way anyways.

have a bit of a reputation for breaking bits, frames themseleves always did very well!


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Where did he say "fun = jumps/drops/dh"?

Jumps/drops/dh is fun

That and any number of these lightweight frame listed above will quite happily survive jumps/drops/dh.

Although maybe not the sort that a 5.5lb full sus frame will cope with.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:11 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

want that liteville! sadly bank account says don't you bloody dare! 🙂


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Alpin, where do you get Liteville from in the UK?


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:14 pm
Posts: 19
Free Member
 

Gt Distortion, no question. Had a demo one for a few weeks, was awesome.

Complete bikes only though and not many left for the year.

2011 Rize (RZ120) has altered geometry, is now classed as a trail bike, slacker head angles this year, although completes only again.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 9043
Free Member
 

Hmm, might have to try and track down a demo.

Calling STW - have you still got yours? Want to lend it me for a week?


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:20 pm
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

Although maybe not the sort that a 5.5lb full sus frame will cope with.

only if your a biffer 😉

where do you get Liteville from in the UK?

Posh bike in maidstone, used to be a UK dealer/distributer but are no longer listed on the Liteville site... give em a ring/email?


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

or a gnarler


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:24 pm
Posts: 14707
Free Member
 

grrrrrrrrrr :mrgreen:


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

watch yourself, that amount of gnarl could melt a morewood zula


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:27 pm
Posts: 16208
Free Member
 

I have an old 4" Trance. Rides much better with a 130mm fork than the 100mm stock unit. Lardy, but fun.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 1:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

what about a Blackmarket Killswitch or DMR Bolt. not exactly sure how much travel you can stick up front but they're both solid short-travel bikes designed to be thrown about the place.

[img] http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTxa3a3RAvKSEpB5gJkp7__llTZx34EBMQAKfS6YcBFi3mx3DCY&t=1 [/img]

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 2:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

They're full suspension dirt jump frames? They look pointless and are no better (worse infact) than a 4x frame


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 2:44 pm
Posts: 6480
Free Member
 

Blur TRc, size large, then sell it to me (and lol)


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 2:50 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

old trance with a 130mm fork here too. if you are breaking such a frame on jumps and drops then you need to smooth out your riding style, or ride a hardtail for a while to figure out how to ride smoothly. I think people that learn to mtb on full sus don't understand how to use their bodies to absorb energy.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 2:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

all about the old trances! tho i just sold mine and am having a HT revival.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I had this quandry back along and settled on a £190 Trance frame from the bay, great fun..

[url= http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5261/5647198642_6387d43345_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5261/5647198642_6387d43345_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/10818473@N07/5647198642/ ]DSCF6597[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/10818473@N07/ ]Jackass123456789[/url], on Flickr


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 3:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I made this last week. Same travel as my old Epic but much more chuckable.

Needs more testing but so far i'm very pleased with it.

Blur Classic... (straight out of the stand)

[IMG] [/IMG]

Tested!

[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 3:01 pm
 Alex
Posts: 7688
Full Member
 

That DMR looks fun 🙂 I do like my ST4 (110m rear/120mm front).

[url= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2181/5764364421_57b21a8f30_z.jp g" target="_blank">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2181/5764364421_57b21a8f30_z.jp g"/> [/img][/url]
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/alexleigh/5764364421/ ]Triggers Broom[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/alexleigh/ ]Alex Leigh[/url], on Flickr

1300km+ now since last Sept. Really fun bike to ride. Not exactly light but otherwise ace. Fella I ride with has an Anthem X. He loves that, quite lively steering then!


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 3:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Cheap wee blood on fleabay at the moment


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 3:09 pm
 st
Posts: 1445
Full Member
Topic starter
 

bigjim, I've been a die hard hardtail rider for over 20 years and am quite happy riding most on my BFe.

I'm talking about a bike to ease things a bit rather than a skill compensator. I'm don't suppose for a minute that I'd ever break an SC Superlight but at the same time don't want to **** up the handling of a bike for the sake of putting what I see as regular kit on it.

It looks like there may be one or two (mostly expensive) options which makes it easier for me to decide to sit tight for the right thing to come along.

Seems to me that a lot of people out there would go for a frame of the type I'm describing.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 3:10 pm
 Alex
Posts: 7688
Full Member
 

That's what I wanted with the ST4. Still have and ride my HT (although not much). I wanted something I could ride here (Malverns, FoD) and further afield. ST4 has been ridden all over the place including some pretty rocky stuff in Wales, the odd trail centre, and it's been great everywhere.

Occasionally I'd like my HT on some trails, but basically this is the bike I ride for everything. I'm even considering taking it down CwmCarn DH course 🙂


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 3:13 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

bigjim, I've been a die hard hardtail rider for over 20 years and am quite happy riding most on my BFe.

sorry that wasnt aimed at you ;). the trance is my first full susser after years on a hardtail - I chose it because the maestro suspension just seemed the most bearable/non bouncy coming from a hardtail. that was a few years ago so there are a wider range of rear suspensions now, but if you like hammering out of the saddle a la hardtail then i would def test ride a few different bikes to get a feel of the suspension and how it responds to that.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 3:24 pm
 st
Posts: 1445
Full Member
Topic starter
 

It's always a funny one for me. I love riding a long travel bike downhill (currently a Stinky with Boxxers) but whenevr I build up a full sus for generaly riding I feel underwhelmed. I've had a few decent frames but they always seem to deaden the ride and make the forest singletrack I mostly ride feel kind of numb. I was hoping the last one (Meta 4) would be the one but it just didn't feel very lively.


 
Posted : 24/06/2011 3:31 pm
Page 1 / 2