Forum menu
When you convert regular 3 chainring cranks to 1x9, does the single 'middle sized' chainring have to go on the inside of the crank bolts? It seems to me as though this could look a bit wrong with the outer ring missing. Or is that just too fussy? Maybe I haven't explained this well.
Hi
Yes - it has to go on the inside of the spider in the middle ring position. It doesn't look that silly.
GB
Guess that, whether you need one or not, aesthetics may make a reason for fitting a bash?
Single rings look much better with a bash unless you get a pimp cnc'd ring
Do bash guards and chain guides usually fit ok together? The bash guard doesn't foul the chain guide? Suppose it depends which one(s).
Don't bother with a bash guard - just extra weight...
GB
As Gee says, bash gaurds can add significant weight - you'd really notice [url= http://www.bbgbashguard.com/Mountainbike.html ]all of 50g mounted centrally![/url]
8)
Looks fine to me:
[img] 
[/img]
I've used a dangerboy bash and modified an e13 guide like the one on sammyCs above. I don't use the roller or the 'skid' that's part of the e13 setup, no need to functionally and was having bearing issues on the roller jockey. Oh and it's a 1x9 setup. Never lose a chain and offers good protection. Looks? Yeah looks ok and not bothered about the weight, the positives are worth it.
Leaving it in the 'middle' position will typically give you a better chain line. If you are using a std middle ring it will probably have the bolt holes counter sunk so the bolt fits better when fitted behind the spider.
I have a stainless On One SS ring fitted in the middle position on one bike and just gone 2x9 on the other by removing my large ring and the only niggle I have is the recesses in the spider where the large ring goes. I am going to make some carbon fibre fillers to sit in there and save me buying a new set of shorter chainring bolt.
I am not a fan of bash guards. I have an aluminium race face one that looks better than the plastic Shimano ones but I wouldn't run one in 3x9 and I now have more clearance so should be fine.
better having a guide to stop the chain falling off than a bash. imo.
The Pauls chain guide is probably the neatest one I've seen, certainly the smallest. A lot of them are quite big aren't they.
Yeah I have pauls and it works pretty well and is easier to allign with different axle lengths, I want the new hope one though
It's been said a number of times, but BBG + N-Stop = Win
[img] 
[/img]
I just cut and filed teeth off the old big ring when I set up SS. Looks 'normal', no cost, acts as guide and bash.
I have always used a BBG + N-Stop, I haven't had a triple for almost 3 years and don't miss it, currently in the process of converting my Cotic X to 1x9.
middle
[url= http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4107/5063008616_da86514d39_z.jp g" target="_blank">
[url= http://www.flickr.com/photos/rocketdog/5063008616/ ]Renthal + N-Stop[/url] by [url= http://www.flickr.com/people/rocketdog/ ]rOcKeTdOgUk[/url], on Flickr
Is that on a 1x9 rocketdog? Surprised the chain stays on with only one side of the chain being guided.