[Closed] 819s

Posts: 8801
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Do these come in a drilling other than 32?

If not, are there any other proper UST rim available?

Andy


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 4:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Stans?


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 4:52 pm
 GW
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What drilling are you after? Deemax come in 28


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 4:54 pm
Posts: 8801
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Not keen on Stan's, tbh. They're not really proper UST, & I worry about the durability of non-eyeletted rims.

Can you get Deemax rims aftermarket? At 23mm bed, they're a bit wide for the XC mincing that forms most of my riding.

Andy


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 4:56 pm
Posts: 34937
Full Member
 

Stans aren't a proper UST rim. They use a strip


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 4:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Have you ever used them? They really are fantastic. They do use a bit of tape, but I don't know why that's a problem?


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 4:57 pm
Posts: 8801
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I've not used Stan's rims; I have used DT rims with a Stan's kit, & Mavic SLRs which are much better, but 24h. Could really do with something more robust, & can probably cope with 32h, but Lefty hubs seem to be more easily available in 28h.

Andy


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 5:00 pm
Posts: 66083
Full Member
 

Stans isn't "proper" UST in that the rim isn't airtight without the tape, but it works exactly as well, and they're a heck of a lot lighter (remember the Mavic claimed weights for the 8XX rims are, well, total lies- they don't include the nipple insert things).

As for durability, can't really comment as mine aren't old enough but I've never heard of any long term issues.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 5:06 pm
 Del
Posts: 8273
Full Member
 

my old prophet came with 819s so there must be a lefty hub to match out there.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 5:07 pm
Posts: 71
Free Member
 

[url= http://www.leisurelakesbikes.com/product/mavicxm819mtbdiscrim.aspx?&id=6183 ]28h[/url], sure they're available elsewhere.

Agree that Stans are days and nights better though, UST rims and tyres are just too much of a weight penalty IMO.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 5:13 pm
Posts: 8801
Full Member
Topic starter
 

UST rims and tyres are just too much of a weight penalty IMO.

In my case, any weight saving would be offset by the rider being a fat knacker ๐Ÿ˜›

Good news about 28s though - thanks for the link.

Andy


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 5:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Don't disregard Stans rims. I've just laced a Flow rim onto a hub i previously had an XM819 rim on. I dinged the XM819 rim so badly that when i tried to straighten it, the rim cracked! So i thought i'd try a Flow rim.

I thought UST rims were great until i tried the Flow. One layer of tape, poked the valve through and the tyre inflated quicker than the previous 'proper' UST set-up did. Can't comment on longevity of non-eyeleted rim but not heard anything negative yet.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 6:44 pm
Posts: 507
Free Member
 

Here's a negative for you Nick:) Just replaced a Stans for a customer because the spokes had pulled through the rim, not sure what she'd done to it apart from xc racing, but they made hell of a mess.


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 9:00 pm
Posts: 1021
Full Member
 

Friend has a 24H 819, the hub has just broken itself and chances of finding another 24H hub seem low.

he'd be willing to sell ๐Ÿ˜‰

keppoch


 
Posted : 16/10/2010 11:12 pm
Posts: 34937
Full Member
 

[i]UST rims and tyres are just too much of a weight penalty IMO.[/i]

If you're racing maybe but in the real world it hardly matters. My 819s with a hope rear and a boggo 20mm front are 1800g built up. Not exactly lardy.


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 6:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Coatesy...that would indeed suck, if you had paid retail on a Stans rim ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 7:57 am
Posts: 8801
Full Member
Topic starter
 

the hub has just broken itself and chances of finding another 24H hub seem low.

Keppoch,

I've got a fairly low-mileage 24h rear hub on a trashed DT rim that I might be willing to part with if local (Rochdale).

Andy


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 8:28 am