Balls to short travel e-MTBs PLUS Fabien Barel

Podcast

by 8

Benji expresses his thoughts on short travel e-MTBs, Chipps explains how and why 2x gearing seems to be back and Hannah sentences Fabien Barel to a desert island for the rest of his life.

Full members listen ad free here

Oops! There\’s something to see here that only our full members get to see. Join us today for instant access to this content and more.

This episode is sponsored by Oladance

Oladance Wearable Stereo is your best choice when you want superior sound and the utmost comfort while keeping alter with your surroundings to stay safe. 16 hours long battery life also secures your long ride. Oladance is the must-have earbuds for more than 2 hours of continuous use!

Order yours now

Help us make our podcasts even better

Take our podcast survey
Author Profile Picture
Mark Alker

Singletrack Owner/Publisher

What Mark doesn’t know about social media isn’t worth knowing and his ability to balance “The Stack” is bested only by his agility on a snowboard. Graphs are what gets his engine revving, at least they would if his car wasn’t electric, and data is what you’ll find him poring over in the office. Mark enjoys good whisky, sci-fi and the latest Apple gadget, he is also the best boss in the world (Yes, he is paying me to write this).

More posts from Mark

Search the forum using the power of Google

Overview Chat Bike Members News Women
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Balls to short travel e-MTBs PLUS Fabien Barel
  • monkeyboyjc
    Full Member

    I’m looking buying either the rift zone e over the alpine trail e – the rift zone is 140mm the alpine is 150mm at the back so only a difference of 10mm. The geo is exactly the same. The bigger difference for me is mullet Vs 29r….

    I’m leaning to the rift zone as I can swap bunch of bits over from my current trail bike – wheels forks etc.

    But the again my other bike is a fill rigid fat bike set up for fun. Travel doesn’t = fun….

    Posted 7 months ago
    bikesandboots
    Full Member

    tl;dl on the short travel subject?

    Posted 7 months ago
    dyna-ti
    Full Member

    Theres a number of threads over on the EMTB forum of folk who opted for the short travel Ebike, then post up inquiries about fitting a longer fork and pushing the shock.

    You can always go down the travel in the future, but the other way isn’t as easy or desirable, or even possible in the case of the shock.

    Maybe a pro rider can get on with shorter over longer, but not everybody is a pro.

    Posted 7 months ago
    monkeyboyjc
    Full Member

    Yes but benji complains that a shorter travel doesn’t necessarily mean better efficiency, I’d argue that longer travel doesn’t mean more fun.

    Posted 7 months ago
    mtbfix
    Full Member

    I sensed that Chipps did not entirely agree but wasn’t about to be drawn into the debate.

    Posted 7 months ago
    GeForceJunky
    Full Member

    I have both a Merida e120 and e160, which are basically identical other than fork and rear travel. Can confirm the e120 is pointless and has no advantage over the e160.

    Posted 7 months ago
    Mark
    Full Member

    I sensed that Chipps did not entirely agree but wasn’t about to be drawn into the debate.

    You may be right 😉 You may have detected I was trying to start that ‘debate’ but Chipps is just too nice 🙂

    Posted 7 months ago
    nickc
    Full Member

    I’d argue that longer travel doesn’t mean more fun.

    But it often means more capable.

    Posted 7 months ago
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Search the forum using the power of Google

Overview Chat Bike Members News Women