Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 42 total)
  • What's the harm?
  • Cougar
    Full Member

    Whenever we discuss “alternative” medicine on here we usually get some folk arguing, “but what’s the harm?” Homeopathy doesn’t work beyond placebo, but placebo can be very effective so what’s the problem? See also, the recent vaccination thread.

    Spotted this earlier, it’s an interesting read. Or in the words of half of the Internet lately, “this woman had a sick baby, what happened next will shock you!!1!”

    https://www.tavs.info/2015/07/12/antivaxers-child-ends-up-in-hospital-after-terrible-advice/

    AdamW
    Free Member

    That is Very Scary Indeed. If nutjobs want to kill themselves by using woo OK (as long as they are not contagious and hurt others) but hurting a child like that?

    Absolute nutcases.

    fin25
    Free Member

    Our bodies’ “intelligent design over millions of years”.
    Wow
    Surely she can be done for telling the mother very clearly NOT to seek medical advice?

    slackalice
    Free Member

    Here we go 😥

    The Mod must be bored and looking to exercise his hammer perhaps? 😉

    All we need now is to include a religion reference…

    whatnobeer
    Free Member

    I really don’t understand the ‘whats the harm’ argument. I can see that it works on a very simplistic level, but we’ve essentially got people peddling products and advice that at best do no damage and at worst can lead to the death of the patient due to not receive proper care or in the case of vaccinations lead to the reoccurrence of diseases we’d nearly wiped out. I’m of the opinion that an awful lot of alternative medicine (not all of it, but a fair chunk) is essentially fraud and if people are harmed because of it then the practitioner should be held to account.

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    Oh my god. Heaven help us all.

    piedidiformaggio
    Free Member

    Wow 😯

    There are some right nut jobs out there

    scaredypants
    Full Member

    I bet Hitler* embraced homeopathy, and probably had no vaccines either

    * yeah, Hitler and all the other Nazis

    (I’m assuming Godwin applies here, otherwise I’ll have to drag in religion) 😀

    thestabiliser
    Free Member

    What about homoeopathic cycle helmets, I bet Jesus hates THEM as well. Does He?

    wanmankylung
    Free Member

    all we need now is a kiddy fiddling comment and a couple of spurious a’postrophe’s

    v8ninety
    Full Member

    Hang on, this’ll work for sure;

    I wonder what TJ and Fred would think about all this?

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Our bodies’ “intelligent design over millions of years”.

    Lol yeah right, and yet our bollocks are still on the outside.

    bearnecessities
    Full Member

    All we need now is to include a religion driving reference

    teethgrinder
    Full Member

    You can’t invoke Godwin on purpose to try to end an argument on the webz.

    leffeboy
    Full Member

    Did Steve Jobs not also follow a lot of alternative medicine and he could hardly be considered a nutter.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Did Steve Jobs not also follow a lot of alternative medicine and he could hardly be considered a nutter.

    Not exactly a good example of it working well either!

    whatnobeer
    Free Member

    he could hardly be considered a nutter

    He was a bit of a ‘nutter’ and an arsehole. Refused medically proven life saving treatments, a lot of his staff were terrified of him in case he fired them, denied he had a daughter to avoid paying her support money…

    leffeboy
    Full Member

    Ok, but he was undoubtedly also very bright. It’s difficult to understand why he didn’t take better medical advice or why anyone does for that matter

    Or is it just the fear of ‘proper’ drugs?

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    There’s lots of different types of “bright”.
    Jobs had a gift for business, leadership and design – doesn’t mean he knew anything about medicine.

    Kuco
    Full Member

    Jobs had a gift for business, leadership and design – doesn’t mean he knew anything about medicine.

    No, but I bet he had an app for that.

    geetee1972
    Free Member

    Ok, but he was undoubtedly also very bright. It’s difficult to understand why he didn’t take better medical advice or why anyone does for that matter

    I believe he was on record as stating it was a decision (not to immediately get medical treament) he deeply regretted and acknolwedged that if he had done, he would likely have survived.

    On a separate note, I read recently that Novak Djovich (or whatever he’s called, that tall chap that plays tennis), was advised by his ‘nutrionist’ that his body was rejecting ‘wheat’ by doing the following experiment on him:

    The tennis star Novak Djokovic believes he owes his stellar 2011 season to giving up gluten. In his book Serve to Win, he describes the moment his nutritionist Igor Cetojevicv gave him a slice of bread and told him to hold it against his stomach while he held his other arm out straight. Then Cetojevicv pushed down on his arm. “With the bread against my stomach, my arm struggled to resist Cetojevicv’s downward pressure. I was noticeably weaker,” the tennis star writes. “This is a sign that your body is rejecting the wheat in the bread,” Cetojevicv told him. (Djokovic did go on to have a blood test too.)

    Stoner
    Free Member

    ^ LOL

    Which begs the question, would you trade your brains for epic tennis skills?

    What ability would you sacrifice for superior skills in another?

    aracer
    Free Member

    That’s a no brainer

    nealglover
    Free Member

    Did Steve Jobs not also follow a lot of alternative medicine and he could hardly be considered a nutter.

    Probably not your “textbook” nutter no.

    He is dead though.

    So, you know….. Same result despite appearances.

    BigDummy
    Free Member

    If we were being bloody-minded, I suppose we could suggest that considerable iatrogenic harm is certainly done to loads of children by proper medical doctors every year.

    We’re inclined to be much harsher in judgment about harm done in the course of doing something abnormal.

    Same as your boss being pissy about your week off work for a bike crash, but sympathetic to someone else’s persistent diabetes from too much sofa and ice cream.

    🙂

    slackalice
    Free Member

    A view I heard recently was that conventional medicine is borne from chemistry and homeopathy borne from physics.

    There ya go…. Flame away. 😈

    mikewsmith
    Free Member

    Ah the special branch of physics…

    About as credible as the Lizard People I suppose

    jam-bo
    Full Member

    A view I heard recently was that conventional medicine is borne from chemistry and homeopathy borne from physics.
    There ya go…. Flame away.

    Were you listening to an idiot?

    slackalice
    Free Member

    It’s a bit like finding a wasps nest in the loft and poking it with a stick just wearing underpants 😉

    jam-bo
    Full Member

    Is homeopathy good for wasp stings?

    Solo
    Free Member

    molgrips – Member
    ” Our bodies’ “intelligent design over millions of years”

    Lol yeah right, and yet our bollocks are still on the outside.

    Sounds like a complaint. However, you’ve no need to worry.
    In your case, I’m fairly sure it no longer applies.

    tang
    Free Member

    Interestingly in India to practice homeopathy you have to be a qualified Doctor. My indian relatives are all Doctors who mainly studied here or in the States. Infact my grandfather was one of the top consultants in the country right up till he died at 87 still working and researching. He had a very broad view of medicine and prescribed ayerveda, homeopathy and conventional modern drugs.
    I liked his stories of working in the interior of the Amazon in the 60s and realising very quickly that in such remote places local herbal medicine was a must due to the sheer remoteness after contracting some waterborne nastiness and being treated by local plant remedies.

    SaxonRider
    Full Member

    I couldn’t see the original link for some reason (could be the firewall at work), but frankly no discussion about homeopathic medicine is complete with Mitchell and Webb’s input.

    [video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMGIbOGu8q0[/video]

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    At present, in India, homeopathy is the third most popular method of medical treatment after allopathy and Ayurveda. There are over 200,000 registered homeopathic doctors currently, with approximately 12,000 more being added every year.

    Source: PubMed paper

    How’s that working out I wonder?

    Healthy Life Expectancy in India: 57
    Healthy Life Expectancy in the UK: 71

    Obviously there are a lot of compounding factors here, not least socio-economic, but then homeopathy isn’t expensive – the main ingredient is water.

    Solo
    Free Member

    What’s the harm?

    This is the weaker of the two tests. The test should be the stronger.
    To prove the benefit.

    Lots of items have been unleashed into the public, on the basis that no harm could be demonstrated.

    I’d have preferred stuff to under go the burden of proving the benefit of anything new.

    jam-bo
    Full Member

    i still like the proposal that if you reduce the level of funding for homeopathy on the NHS, it should become much more effective.

    gypsumfantastic
    Free Member

    How can the homeopath be sure that their water remembered the right substance it’s diluted?

    I often wonder that when I flush the loo

    molgrips
    Free Member

    In your case, I’m fairly sure it no longer applies.

    After Saturday’s 15 hour bike ride you’re probably right.

    tang
    Free Member

    GrahamS – That data has nothing to do with homeopathy and that horrifying reality in India is why we fund 2 clinics in poor and remote regions with transport to hospitals for major operations and train local women to become nurses and midwives, vaccinate, provide nets and testing etc. Tbf Grandfather knew that homeopathy was a bit ‘subtle’ but its part of normal life there.
    Personally I am very sceptical of the claims that some homeopaths make. However, a broader deeper understanding of our health is something that modern medicine often overlooks in the busy cash strapped clinical situation. Often older traditional practise(I don’t really mean homeopathy) provide a better ‘whole’ person approach which can be highly useful in a preventative way as well as treatment.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    However, a broader deeper understanding of our health is something that modern medicine often overlooks in the busy cash strapped clinical situation

    Really? You have insight into this or is it just knee-jerk anti-modernism? Cos whenever I hear doctors talking they are all about the whole person and finding ways to improve treatment with whole-person methods… most doctors aren’t stupid, after all.

    There’s a lot of rhetoric in the US about modern medicine being procedure-led but they have a totally different business model. Just look at childbirth experiences there vs here for an example.

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 42 total)

The topic ‘What's the harm?’ is closed to new replies.