Cycling Plus has a grouptest this month if it’s still out.
2 steel, 2 alumminium and 2 carbon road bikes all arround £1600-£1800.
And a seperate review of 6 Ti bikes.
They admit that none of the stereotypes/expectations were met.
One of the steel bikes was almost too stiff and more suited to raceing, the other more ‘steel’ like, but still too good to pidgeonhole as a commuter/sportive/hack and more than up for club runs and raceing.
One of the carbon bikes was badly tought out and a bit cheep, the other was the test winner as an all rounder.
The aluminium bikes were still a valid alternative to carbon for quality and ride, but no longer had the benefit of better kit/lower price.
The Ti bikes looked a mixed bag, astheticaly I think they look like really low end aluminum frames*? Or is that just me? Probably a more relavent review if youir interested in one.
*a mix of straight tubes that aren’t sleek like steel can be, and odd tube shapes that look like a late 90’s attempt at hydroforming for the sake of it.