Point was, it was presented as two successive tests, as though the only difference was skin colour. But that wasn’t the motive of the original video, it’s a compilation so could’ve been filmed at different times in different places. Ie, there may be a whole load of other variables that we’re not aware of. Not that I’m defending the police behaviour, rather I just think the presentation may be misleading.
Anyway, that’s not why I’m here. I came across this just now:
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/sep/20/richard-dawkins-questions-ahmed-mohamed-motive-backlash
Shouty godbotherer-botherer aside, there’s an interesting turn of events here. Seems meladdo’s home electronics project was nothing of the sort, rather it was (allegedly) a commercial alarm clock which he’d taken to bits and packed into a case.
Suddenly the “what’s it for” question seems a whole lot more relevant if it’s not something he proudly took in to show his teachers (unless he was trying to gain false credit I suppose). It’s starting to smell like he intentionally wanted to look as suspicious as possible in order to, I don’t know, prove a point about perceived or actual racism perhaps, and ended up with a whole lot more attention than he probably bargained for.
Maybe.