Forum menu
Singletrack Decide ...
 

[Closed] Singletrack Decide Not To Cover the Danny MacAskill Playboy Video

Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 
[#6385426]

Following the [url= http://singletrackworld.com/forum/topic/oh-dear-danny-macaskill-please-dont-do-the-playboy-mansion-thing- ]Oh dear Danny Macaskill - please don't do the Playboy Mansion thing[/url]
thread I saw this:

[img] [/img]

Looks like STW are getting a bit of a pounding for it though judging by the comments on road.cc and the Evans facebook page which picked it up:

http://road.cc/content/news/125708-danny-macaskill-under-fire-over-playboy-mansion-video

https://www.facebook.com/evanscycles/photos/a.134484779909268.18970.128709230486823/826296710728068/?type=1

Good on them I say!

I like Danny. But it's hard enough getting women into cycling (and getting them accepted by the male egos there) without this kind of dated "mags lad" video.

Read the breathless drooling in mainstream rags like the Record or the Mirror: [i]"ride of his life"[/i], [i]"eye candy"[/i], [i]"saucy stunners"[/i], [i]"scantily-clad models"[/i], [i]"buxom beauties"[/i], [i]"every male’s fantasy"[/i] etc etc ...

... pathetic out-of-date misogyny and I'm glad Singletrack have taken the higher horse on this one.

Well done.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:31 pm
Posts: 28712
Full Member
 

STW, now sponsored by the Daily Mail


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:32 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

STW, now sponsored by the Daily Mail

???

You have clearly never browsed the Daily Mail Sidebar of Shame.
This is exactly the kind of story they lap up.

Here's just the first few stories in today's:

[img] [/img]

Hardly a shining beacon of Feminist Action is it?


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:34 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

So Mark is taking a bit of a pounding, eh?

Hopefully he has a decent rearguard action.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:34 pm
Posts: 12328
Full Member
 

Hardly, this is EXACTLY the sort of thing the Daily Mail would put links to from their website. And click throughs from STW to the Daily Mail are blocked.

Beaten to it.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Selfrighteous Twunt World?

I'm far more annoyed that people feel the need to politicise every damn thing than a pop manufacturer making a video of a kid doing bike stunts in front of girls in bikinis.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:35 pm
Posts: 8948
Free Member
 

Meanwhile from the Redbull Gazette

'We Don't Give A Toss'

For yoofs innit, not the demographic on the radio 4 of off road cycling (here). Shame, cos it is tacky and harumph inducing but then I'm only saying that cos I'm old and square.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:37 pm
Posts: 8
Free Member
 

I'm with Mark on this one. Even the thought of playboy makes me think of s****ing 14 year olds and Jimmy Saville.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:39 pm
Posts: 1617
Free Member
 

tbh i would take the view that it's an absolutely cr@p video as good enough reason not to view it.

I can't believe the thread about it went on for so long as there wasn't exactly much playboy bunny content and certainly nothing much to be outraged over. Just a disappointing attempt to make a bike video and not up to Danny's or Redbull's usual standards.

But, they were given the chance to ride and film there - why not? As long as they didn't jump over girls involved in soft (or hard) porn I don't see a problem. Just next time make the riding worth the effort. (obviously I can't do anything like Danny can do but know he can do better and enjoy watching these types of videos when done properly).


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:40 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

You have clearly never browsed the Daily Mail Sidebar of Shame.

Nah, you need the [url= http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/sideboob/ ]HuffPo Sideboob page[/url]
(May not be entirely SFW, folks)


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:40 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

I'm with Mark on this one. Even the thought of playboy makes me think of s****ing 14 year olds and Jimmy Saville.

You seem like a decent sort, Adam. But u wot m8?

If Playboy makes you think of, world renown paedophile/necrophiliac, Mr Saville, then I would love to see the mental gymnastics that got you to that conclusion.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Fair enough for not wanting to cover it; it's their choice but shouting it from the rooftops is desperate and a bit pathetic. It smacks of the saddo schoolkid trying to woo the pretty girl.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:41 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

I heard he only went for the articles


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:42 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

I'm far more annoyed that people feel the need to politicise every damn thing..

Then you get older and realise that every damn thing [i]IS[/i] political!

The media our society produces shapes how our society develops.
If we don't criticise it then how can we change it?


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:42 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Presumably Danny is keeping quiet and not making any comments?


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:45 pm
Posts: 4041
Full Member
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

and the real result - everyone is still talking about it.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:47 pm
Posts: 435
Free Member
 

Why on earth does the monster saville need to mentioned in this thread? Seriously try and at least keep it on topic 🙄

As for the actual topic I'm with STW on this one.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:48 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

shouting it from the rooftops is desperate and a bit pathetic.

They tweeted about it. One tweet in thousands in the TwitterStorm surrounding the video. That's not exactly shouting about it - it's just taking a position.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:48 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Everybody, look at us, look at us! We are not showing this video but here have some free publicity anyway.

Load of shite.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Good on you STW! Some of the posts on road.cc are pure dickhead bingo.

And don't see how posting about it/not featuring it is making a mountain out of a molehill?


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Great decision by Singletrack. Another reason to buy their mag rather than MBUK or similar, where you're still likely to find the odd female in the ads, draped over some obscure bike components or cheesy clothing.

This: "But it's hard enough getting women into cycling (and getting them accepted by the male egos there) without this kind of dated "mags lad" video."

Plus the riding in the film was shite.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:51 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

That's not exactly shouting about it - it's just taking a position.

To me it's the taking a position thing that comes up in here loads on the "What will you be doing to avoid the _______" threads of trying to point out that you just purchased a fine acre of moral high ground to build an ivory tower and a glass house.

If you don't want to support something and give it publicity then just don't talk about it.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:52 pm
 D0NK
Posts: 10677
Full Member
 

Presumably Danny is keeping quiet and not making any comments?
too busy slacklining

Fair enough for not wanting to cover it; it's their choice but shouting it from the rooftops is desperate and a bit pathetic.
is 1 tweet shouting from the rooftops? I've only heard about it from this thread, they didn't put owt up on the front-page (I had to check, don't hit front page very often 😳 )


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:53 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

How should they have handled it then rene59, a discrete hand-written note to every member explaining their decision?

Or just completely ignore it and condone it with their silence?


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:53 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Remember kids. There is good controversial, and bad controversial.

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:54 pm
Posts: 12336
Full Member
 

Well this has got legs.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do they feel the need to explain every other video they don't cover?


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm delighted the Danny M video is not being covered. Well done STW


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:57 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

I'm delighted the Danny M video is not being covered. Well done STW

*chuckles*


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 12:58 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

If it was 98 they could show this one 🙂


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've seen the vain vagrant vid mentioned a few times, what's the 'link' between it and the Danny Mac video? (at work so can't watch any vids 😥 )


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:01 pm
 iolo
Posts: 194
Free Member
 

I quite enjoy reading Playboy.
I'm 39.
Let's do a survey now.
Who reads the Sun?
Or the Daily Star?
Be honest now.
I can guarantee what you read in see and read in Playboy will be far more beneficial than the garbage forced into people on a daily basis..


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:01 pm
Posts: 57390
Full Member
 

I only read the Morning Star and vintage copies of Razzle that I keep in a hedge


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:02 pm
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

what's the 'link' between it and the Danny Mac video?

The Danny Mac Red Bull/Playboy ad is controversial as it has women in swimwear wandering round and objections to the objectification of women.

The Vain Variant vid is a bit weird and using term controversial will ensure more hits to it.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:04 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

what's the 'link'

Tokenism?


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:04 pm
Posts: 2182
Free Member
 

I watched the video over the weekend.

If you want a video showcasing the amazing skills of Danny, all his previous ones are much better in my opinion. The stunts and camera work fall short of what he has produced before.

If you want a video of girls in bikini's, the internet is full of them.

It seemed to me to be purely a stunt to generate this type of chat and controversy.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Condone it by silence..... 😆


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:06 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Condone it by silence..... 😆

Why funny? You think that doesn't happen?

If no one speaks out about something then it is taken as accepted, which only gives more power to the people holding that viewpoint.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:20 pm
 Nick
Posts: 3693
Full Member
 

You only have to look on the Mirror website to see how the misogynists see this..

RIDE of his life (s****)

The Playboy Mansion has seen more than its fair share of action over the years. (action, fnarr)

how to thrill the ladies (go on my son)

scantily clad models (phoar)

audience of buxom beauties parading (hubba hubba)

enjoy a splash with the saucy stunners (bet she's a goer)

a selection of gorgeous glamour girls (etc etc etc)

Can't blame Singletrack for not wanting anything to do with that, and disappointed that Danny thought it was a good idea, he deserves all the criticism he gets.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If no one speaks out about something then it is taken as accepted

Except its not. Read the thread on here which was long before the tweet. People will form their own views. The opinion of a MTB magazine IT bod isn't going to change anything.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:25 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

You only have to look on the Mirror website to see how the misogynists see this..

RIDE of his life (s****)

The Playboy Mansion has seen more than its fair share of action over the years. (action, fnarr)

how to thrill the ladies (go on my son)

scantily clad models (phoar)

audience of buxom beauties parading (hubba hubba)

enjoy a splash with the saucy stunners (bet she's a goer)

a selection of gorgeous glamour girls (etc etc etc)

Can't blame Singletrack for not wanting anything to do with that, and disappointed that Danny thought it was a good idea, he deserves all the criticism he gets.

So you went over to the Mirror's website to confirm what you already knew? That tabloid newspapers are on a seaside postcard level of maturity. Ironically, this is exactly the type of nudge nudge wink wink, you wouldn't get in Playboy.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

STW made the right choice.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:31 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

I'd just like to point out that the Playboy Mansion isn't the same thing as the magazine Playboy.


 
Posted : 04/08/2014 1:33 pm
Page 1 / 10