assuming he was doing it “properly” (i.e. blocking the entrance and exit of a trail, not just putting them in on blind corners, at the bottom of steep descents etc)
entrance, exit and many middly bits are covered with evergreen branches from recent-ish thinning/felling, logs are not particularly well hidden and start about 50 yards into the trail (which is about 500m long i suppose). Its got to be a good 2 hours work for one bloke to cover it up. (It was much much longer than that for my pixying friends and I to clear the path and ride it in)
Its not more than 50 yards away from a well established path that dogwalkers use. Oh and i suppose his three dogs will have had a good run around while he was beavering away there.
I’m pretty sure he is some sort of volonteer ‘ranger’: I certainly know of a couple of other blokes that are in our woods.
I suppose the ‘making an easy trail dangerous or unrideable’ is annoying, but what gets my goat really is the idea that cyclists who smell of human and stick to the trails are more concerning to the local fauna than a dog walker who also smells of human, plus his dogs who smell of dog, wee on trees, wander off the trails and get very curious about other animals.
I would be far more worried about some of the frankly ludicrous downhill lines, doubles and drops all of 500m away from the ‘frightened deer zone’. Which i am always finding deer on in the evenings and early mornings anyway…