Loads. He donated all the profits to charity. He kept that a secret though. Obviously if he'd told people it was for charity they'd have bought even more. 
Bike Forum
[closed]
Race Phototraphers? Yeah. OK....
-
Posted 1 year ago #
-
Most race pics I buy are as aide-memoires to the event - frankly so long as it's a half decent pic, I don't mind and I certainly don't really care about the artistic merit of it since I'm not a sensitive artistic type (well at least not obviously) who must have the perfect pic that perfectly captures the inner turmoil of the racer on the edge of his wit, etc
I've got pics from photo-it for the past three or four years, a couple of which are below. I'm happy enough with them.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Oh, and rather suprised to see sfb on the side of ambition considering his oft and well publicised views on competition...
Presumably it's ok to have ambition in something that he approves of (taking good photos) but not in other things
Posted 1 year ago # -
Oh, and rather suprised to see sfb on the side of ambition considering his oft and well publicised views on competition.
simply, ambition is about achievement, not competition. I'm not against competition per se, but I think more people would benefit from sport if it were absent.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Not all trap photos have to be rubbish though:
Posted 1 year ago # -
[EDIT: I don't need to put words in Simon's mouth when he's here]
Posted 1 year ago # -
I think more people would benefit from sport if it were absent.
A fair comment but that does't in itself make competition a bad thing.
And achievement and competition are clearly linked unless you believe in absolutes. 50 years ago an athlete would have achieved massively if they could run under 10 seconds for the 100m (or let's say 10.3 to open it up a bit). Nowadays, that's a far lesser achievement. Achievement is relative for most people whether you agree with it or not.
pjt - why are you trackstanding on the top of a big hill?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Loads. He donated all the profits to charity. He kept that a secret though. Obviously if he'd told people it was for charity they'd have bought even more
Once I have paid the other 3 helpers and repaired or replaced 2 dead flash units there isn't much left in the pot.
For this event I normally give away vouchers to Paul for the prizes for each category,
Two of the SPAM winter challenge events I donated a percentage of each sale to CLIC, this was advertised on their site.
Not sure what other guys do but I know that some actually charge for being there in the 1st place !
Posted 1 year ago # -
Not all trap photos have to be rubbish though
Nice location, could have at least hidden the reflector though.......
Posted 1 year ago # -
50 years ago an athlete would have achieved massively if they could run under 10 seconds for the 100m (or let's say 10.3 to open it up a bit)
yes, obviously, but beside the point for me. I'm interested in ordinary people and their sporting achievements. I'm keen to promote mountain biking as a way to get people active in the face of increasing lethargy. It's ironic that athletic achievements steady improve while general fitness declines
Posted 1 year ago # -
Clubber, iirc i was following someone on a full sus up the climb and round the hairpin so was struggling to keep the wheels turning at the time. either that or posing for the photo.
The only way i know it was a trap photo was the reflector!
Posted 1 year ago # -
Photo-it and others, thanks for taking the time to reply, its been informative and I completely understand your points.
Like clubber, I regularly buy photos from events I've done, as an aide-memoire, but I won't buy them if I think them a boring/run-of-the-mill/plain bad photo. I'd rather have 1 good pic of me, than 4/5/6 boring pics.
The past few events I've done, especially big ones with professionals on the job, ALL the pics from professionals have been boring. So I've scooted around various Flickr sites and amateur collections, in every case those pics (where they got me - most obviously, havn't) they were either markedly better (if less technically perfect), or in some cases (likle Gary Lakes pics, or Sheldon from the HONC a while back) utterly brilliant.
Much of the time though, I'll have been out there 6/12/24 hours, had innumerbale snaps taken of me, none of which were worth buying/exchanging a pint for.
Now you guys can definatly take a damn good pic, so surely there is some way to get sufficient volume of pics to net enough sales, and increase the 'action' or 'artisitic merit' of a given snap???
Posted 1 year ago # -
I think, from the photographers point of view, it's hard to be dynamic and exciting when yet another stranger on a bike comes past. I'm a rider and I'd hate it
Posted 1 year ago # -
It's pretty funny - I was basically slagging off Ti29er too - but he's somehow managed to see it as a complement
Not at all - I've merely turned it on its head & used it to my advantage, although you failed to see it thus.
Another post hit the nail on the head: photography has changed beyond all recognition, when film was employed there was a clear demarcation where those who had taken courses, be they degrees or other courses (my own is a post grad diploma), had studied it at made it our chosen professions, and went out and made a living from taking pictures.
Since the advent of digital, the profession has seen a raft of amateurs taking up what was once the domain of the professional, and I can't really think of another profession that has been so "invaded" (for want of any other term) by amateurs who have made inroads into what was previously the professional photographer’s domain. Mountain biking photography, and in particular, wedding photography would be two very clear examples.
It’s one reason why I personally can’t afford to give all my earnings away from any given event, and who’d expect us to since these events are clearly income streams – although I’ve photographed two events for free thus far in 2010 (RSPCA & UNICEF) and a % of the sales at another (Clic24 for the past 3 years).
By & large, these events don’t return that much income & I’ve had no complaints to date (aside njee’s silly snide remarks) & people continue to buy prints & magazines continue to print the work so it’s clearly a sustainable business model; you just have to choose your events wisely - and have other strings / clients to your bow / portfolio (see Jaguar image above).
Posted 1 year ago # -
There was a comment that a lack of creative merit was being exhibited by race photographers.
As retort:
The above image was used extensively by one publisher in 2009 to promote a bike demo series, both on their web site and in one of their magazines. It was well received. It sold zero prints.Posted 1 year ago # -
Is that the bottom of Jetlag at Glyncorrwg?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Yes, not far from the bottom.
Shot in Jan / Feb (?), it had rained all day, which turned to snow later in the day. Standing around getting pretty cold, waiting for riders to appear out of the gloom - the price one pays for a good picture, how I suffer for my art! Posted 1 year ago # -
Yes. If your ambition is feeding your family while you are alive, Van Gogh's model is flawed.
No it wasn't, he didn't have a family to feed did he?
Posted 1 year ago # -
Just seen these:
Link from home page
Far better than the others and managed to get the atmosphere of the weekend Posted 1 year ago # -
A good case in point.
A remote flash unit behind the tree to light the rider's face would personally have been preferable (from a professional's view point), and again, all those images are being given away for free.Posted 1 year ago # -
Yes, not far from the bottom.
Shot in Jan / Feb (?), it had rained all day, which turned to snow later in the day. Standing around getting pretty cold, waiting for riders to appear out of the gloom - the price one pays for a good picture, how I suffer for my art!Argh, I was riding that day - did two laps on a Superlight and nearly died. Wet to the core from icey rain within 5 mins and then snow/sleet/rain on rotation.
I always come prepared but that was some weather that day!
Posted 1 year ago # -
And go on then, I'm feeling brave thanks to ADH's comments. Some more '09 bike fest. These were all in the last hour so might challenging conditions considering I don't have a full on 'strobist' setup.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I was standing in it all day until the MBR guys came off the hill at the very end.
On the strength of that day & the resultant images I shot events for them at Glentress, Dalby and the White's Enduro. I just happened to be there with some others to ride Afan (inc' njee) that w/end & as always, I had my camera kit with me, so I approached the organisers on that Sunday morning - and we went from there.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Aaah happy times, I remember me and MSP trudging around Penhydd in the wet that day. Horrible.
Posted 1 year ago # -
A remote flash unit behind the tree to light the rider's face would personally have been preferable (from a professional's view point)
...which always looks terrible to me as light does not naturally shine out of the ground and cast strange shadows on people
Posted 1 year ago # -
Crucially, is Peter paid properly for being better than everyone else, or does he just do it for the love of his art?
I've done it twice. First time was purely to learn how to use some new kit. I thought a 'captive audience' was great for this purpose.
It was suggested to me by Joolze that rather than give them away, I should sell them and donate to charity. I chose HFH as it was an Army event, on Army land. Gorrick races are a lot smaller than Bikefest and with 4-5 adverts on various forums I made £40 for HFH at £2 a time. You do the maths...
So, not many no. But I didn't have shots of all the riders who emailed me.I never started out to sell them in the first place, and I was amazed by how many I sold and the feedback I got. I was chuffed to bits Obviously if he'd told people it was for charity they'd have bought even more.
I made that very, very clear. I imagine if you dig back in my profile, you'll find the thread I posted on here
ha ha, but irrelevant. He doesn't have to be any good at it for his point to be valid.
Indeed. It's just a PoV though, nothing more.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I made that very, very clear.
For the avoidance of any doubt created by the mis-calibration of your irony filter, I was remarking that what people will pay for when the money is being donated to a popular charity and what they will pay for when the seller is keeping the proceeds are not necessarily exactly the same. The point being that your claim to commercial viability is not very well evidenced by the fact that you can solicit charitable donations in exchange for your pictures (commendable though that is). It's by-the-by though, and I think we're probably bored of this discussion.
Posted 1 year ago # -
How do you know where to buy said photographs from - i assume they give you a flyer/business card in the "doggy bag" at the ed of the race?
am i right?
Posted 1 year ago # -
I was remarking that what people will pay for when the money is being donated to a popular charity and what they will pay for when the seller is keeping the proceeds are not necessarily exactly the same.
The 2nd time I did it, I did it for myself.
With only leaflets on cars and no forum advertising I made a bit more. I might try again at another event this year. I'll let you know how it goes.
Posted 1 year ago # -
I'll let you know how it goes
Of that, I am absolutely confident. Good luck.
Posted 1 year ago # -
Well, it'll be for HfH again if I do, so I'll be advertising on here.
EDIT
Your link is banned on my work PC. Is it worth looking at tonight? Posted 1 year ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
