Shouldn’t the private rail companies pay to upgrade the infrastructure?
Absolutely not. But they do.
NR’s infrastructure upgrades are very often paid via third party investment in the network (which NR then gets the benefit of since it forms part of its RAB – which it can then borrow against). I spent 3 years acting for various bodies when third party investment in the railway came up for review by the ORR. it is a hugely clunky mechanism which is massively in NR’s favour, which is silly, since it ultimately deters the big money investors from making network improvements.
The fact that Network Rail (a private company) fails to maintain its network to any sort of reasonable standard means that its only really sensible to run heavy rolling stock on the network so that it isn’t shaken to death by the substandard infrastructure, leading to HUGE life-cycle maintenance costs for those trains (which are then passed back to passengers and receipents of rail freight etc).
The almost laughable irony is that when you run a heavy train on NR’s infrastructure, your track access payments (i.e. the payments the train operating companies pay to NR to use the network) are higher because NR claims that heavier trains mean mean higher maintenance costs for the infrastructure.
What’s needed (for rail) is modern and well maintained infrastructure, so that we can catch up with the rest of the world and run lighter, faster, cheaper trains which require less maintenance. Pigs might also fly.
From a wider perspective, what the UK REALLY needs is inter-modal transport. and I mean PROPER inter-modal transport, not a half-arsed effort where First Group et al still fail to recognise muliticketing.
Park and Ride
Regulated bus market (like London)
multi-ticketing schemes – to allow bus/underground/rail/Park and Ride etc all on one ticket
Proper priority systems for public transport, so that it is undeniably quicker than car for town journeys
Ride quality improvements for buses and trams (i.e. better road surfaces, everywhere else in Europe does it, just not us).