Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • New rear wheel
  • Kieran
    Full Member

    Before i order one, has anybody got any suggestions for alternatives to a Hope Pro2 rear wheel with a DT Swiss 4.2 rim? Needs to be light, strong and under £200

    Bikes a Cannondale Rush used reasonably hard

    I_Ache
    Free Member
    njee20
    Free Member

    Totally agree with Andy. Although if you think the 4.2 is adequate I'd consider the 355 rim option.

    Kieran
    Full Member

    hmm, how does the flow rim compare to say an XC717?

    I've ridden the 4.2d's on a prophet before and did dent them!

    would like to get the rim weight pretty low though

    rob1984p
    Free Member

    I reckon 717's are great rims, I have them on my hardtail which gets treated to pretty horrid line choices and they have held up really well. Everyone I have known with dt rims ends up with dings and eggs.

    Kieran
    Full Member

    They're just a bit on the chubby side for a 17mm rim though!

    4.2d's are widish and light
    717's are too heavy and too narrow
    stans look great for width (20mm?) and somehwere betwwen the two on weight

    Am i right?

    Any opinions on the hubs – doesn't look like anything can come close to the pro2's for weight and cost (and I wont use shimano – what the F are cup and cone bearings still doing in a wheel?) but I dont like the noise

    geetee1972
    Free Member

    Mavic 717 is 395g; the Stans Flows is 470g.

    The Flow is equivalent to say a Mavic 819 in terms of weight and strength, but it's a bit wider.
    The Mavic 717 is equivalent to the Stans 355
    The rim that might be ideal for you is the ZTR Arch, which at 420g falls between the 717 and the Flow.

    PeterPoddy
    Free Member

    4.2d's are widish and light
    717's are too heavy and too narrow

    They are virtually idnetical in both aspects!

    4.2 – 400g & 23.7mm
    717 – 395g & 23.4mm

    😀

    Jerome…
    Full Member

    Sorry to tag-along here: seeking opinions on the arch/flow issue. Does anyone have experience of both? Would I regret getting the wider rims, i.e. burp outs and added weight, or would I love the squarer profile and never look back? (I realize of course that I will love both, but which would I love just that little bit more?!)

    My details: 170lb without gear, blur classic, upto aggressive xc/light am, never race but don't want extra weight if it won't add to performance, tyre range from mud x's at 2.0 in winter to rampages at 2.35 in summer; trails range from wooded and rooty singletrack to rocky ups and downs, plan to run them tubeless at circa 30psi, and they'll be replacing xc717's. Because of hope hoops, flow is cheaper by gbp100 (gbp230, versus gbp330 for arches for the set), but I'd pay extra if the arches are better for my purposes.

    Thanks,

    Jerome…

    I_Ache
    Free Member

    Just get the flows and spend the £100 on something else.

    peteimpreza
    Full Member

    Kieran, long time no hear fella.

    Drop me a line I may have something suitable.

    ahwiles
    Free Member

    i reckon the nuke-proof generator hub is worth a look.

    it's just as well made as a hope pro-II, it's the same weight, it's £100 vs £120 and a lot quieter.

    i'm very impressed by just how much grief a mavic 719 (450g) will cope with, i've no experience running it tubeless though…

    (the above combo cost me £130 from CRC about a year ago, very happy, no complaints)

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

The topic ‘New rear wheel’ is closed to new replies.