Call me a sad old git but this, apparently, is a pic of her new ‘fuller’ figure and all I can think to say is……………………..oh yes 😀

very sad 🙁

Err girl power/power to you sister err etc
Ps. Why is she wearing Primark lycra jeans?

power to you sister

more like burger and fries 🙁

I’m with the OP. She looks great. Far better than all the emaciated lollpop heads you see these days: Shaped like a woman, not a skeleton
😀

Shaped like a woman, not a skeleton

shaped like a fat woman 🙁

much better, looks like a woman and not a small boy.

I’m not sure I know who she is, but she doesn’t strike me as excessive.

🙂

With the voice of Borat: Niiiice….

Seriously, she looks so much better now.

barnes, you take pictures like that all the time you old prevert…

3rd view point, I dont actually think she looks much different.

She looks about perfect to me

Rather that than Micha [sp] Barton et al. I think Jessica is a sexy retard regardless of her weight.

So the Media crucify her for being too skinny and bad example for kids blah blah blah, and the same Media crucify her for being “FAT” when she looks like a perfectly normal, healthy woman.

shaped like a fat woman

Fat? You are joking right?
Curvy maybe, but fat? Nahh. Stick to your flat chested lollypop heads…

😉

I would

The only really “sad” thing is the Daily Wail:

Four years ago, Jessica Simpson was one of the top bodies in Hollywood …butlet go of her hard earned 36-24-36 figure…prior to gaining weight, Jessica would regularly appear on Hollywood red carpets in eye-popping dresses which showed off her svelte figure to perfection…”Battle of the bulge: It seems Jessica over-indulged a little over the festive season”…Perhaps feeling self-conscious about her expanding waistline, Jessica opted for an unflattering pair of high-waisted jeans…Piling on the pounds…”

Now, I don’t care about what she looks like, and she doesn’t care whether I care, but that sort of snide carping is so utterly trivial, pointless and nasty that it genuinely does annoy me. That she is slightly larger than she used to be is not interesting, it is not worthy of comment. Mentioning it is sad, and banging on about the fact in such a negative way is vicious.

I dread to imagine what the wretched people would write about my appearance if they ever identified a market for nasty articles about skinny boys who hit 30 and developed a slightly flabby arse….

😕

If you saw her down your local……….

hit 30 and developed a slightly flabby arse….

You can get implants for that nowadays and return to your youthful pertness 😉

WHO GIVES A FLYING F*?K

mije –
WHO GIVES A FLYING F*?K

Heterosexual men?

For reference, her old figure:

I’ll take one of each please bob

Looks nice. Still looks nice, although clearly larger.

😯

Heterosexual men?

who only see women as sex objects?

Fat cow

who only see women as sex objects?

there’s other benefits?

Heterosexual men?………who only see women as sex objects?

Not quite. The most avid interest in celebrity weight loss/gain comes from women !

WHO GIVES A FLYING F*?K

You obviously, otherwise why bother to read and make comments

The only really “sad” thing is the Daily Wail:

Any journalist who writes anything like that should be forced to include a photo of their belly instead of a byline.

woody – cheap shots – are you a sexist or not?

The most avid interest in celebrity weight loss/gain comes from women !

a fair point but hardly in sync with the majority view above…

You obviously, otherwise why bother to read and make comments

i have no interest in jessica s whatsoever, but, yes, i’m very bothered nuts/loaded type boy-behavior

there’s other benefits?

my partner is a good rider, probably better than you, usually out on the moor when you are watching repeats of top gear on the iplayer, eating crisps

< sweeping generalization > my guess would be the journalist is gay, as it seems to be more and more that homosexual men dictate what heterosexual men should find attractive </ sweeping generalization >

personally I think she looks good in both, however I have to say I personally don’t fancy women with small boys/childrens shaped bodies, so most Hollywood starlets don’t do it for me.

I’m with Miketually on that. It would be nice if these journos printed a comparison pic of their own perfection before slagging off other people.

She’s not exactly a ‘big’ girl now she’s put on some weight, is she?

And for the record……..oh yes, most definitely. In my dreams…….

Errrr
Who is she?
What is she famous for?

I think mije has clambered on that ‘Angel of the South’ thing…….erm, high horse, geddit? 😉

I agree with your initial comment – who gives a flying watchamacallit….? People should have more to worry about than whether JS has been visiting Wendy’s a bit more lately.

But, where has all the ‘nothing but sex object’ toot come from?

Someone in the media dresses in very little, dances provocatively, pouts and swishes her hair round, performs in videos draped over a car in a bikini getting all soaped up and you don’t expect blokes are going to comment on how fit she is or whether they would like to have a horizontal tango with said scrumpet……??

Am I the only one who was expecting to see a chunky…

Jenga, she’s an American popstar who was in the fairly recent Dukes of Hazzard film re-make and and sang the main song for the film.
Search youtube for an insight……..here you go:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReXt4l9r2pA

….are you ready boots…….??

Am I the only one who was expecting to see a chunky…

Lisa Simpson’s too busy appearing in the 2012 logo.

MK1

MK2

If anyone, and I mean ANYONE says mk2 is better, they are a lentil munching perma-flacid jeyer of the highest order.

fat/thin or whatever, i still think she’s ugly

I would on both accounts within an inch of her life or till her toes nails fell off which ever comes first!!!!!!!!!!! 🙄