Viewing 23 posts - 41 through 63 (of 63 total)
  • Genetically modifying a human embryo.
  • CHB
    Full Member

    Then we need to nuke the sun, it’s the only way to be safe. 🙂

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    grow super humans or a nazi race of blondes.

    Who cares….blondes are hot and the Nazi’s had style…..

    bring on the 6 foot lithe blonde women clad in Hugo Boss…..I’ll die aroused.

    CHB
    Full Member

    You can’t just use animals/embryos on a whim.

    …unless you are in Russia or China. Which is why I fully support fast and funded research into this topic in our country. We will regulate it as appropriate. How we then stop the knowledge being misappropriated by less scrupulous countries and corps is another issue, but if you stopped research based on those concerns then you would never do any science.

    poah
    Free Member

    different country different rules. I may move to china ha ha ha ha

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    You know it’s disgusting puritans like some of you lot that make my job **** dull. For instance, in Halo, the Spartans are a race of genetically engineered super-soldiers. Thanks to bioethics, that won’t happen. For some inconceivable reason, bioethicists and the public in general hate genetic engineering, cloning, weapon testing on prisoners of war, and fun in general. You can’t clone humans…. you can’t genetically engineer and cybernetically enhance your kid to have super strength coupled with Einsteins IQ. You can’t kidnap people, remove their stomach, and sew their esophagus to their duodenum. Where will it end?

    tonyg2003
    Full Member

    There are things that can already be done in terms of preconception screening and preimplantation genetic diagnosis to ensure couples don’t have children with diseases like SMA or CMT.

    In the US there is a huge amount of screening already and a reasonable amount of PGD.

    Gene editing is altering germline in a somewhat unkown way. This is very new technology and we need to look at it very carefully before using it in human germlines.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    There are things that can already be done in terms of preconception screening and preimplantation genetic diagnosis to ensure couples don’t have children with diseases like SMA or CMT.

    But only if the couple is aware that they may be carriers, no? We certainly didn’t screen for anything before we had kids, we just assumed we’d be fine.

    maccruiskeen
    Full Member

    You know it’s disgusting puritans like some of you lot that make my job **** dull. For instance, in Halo, the Spartans are a race of genetically engineered super-soldiers. Thanks to bioethics, that won’t happen. For some inconceivable reason, bioethicists and the public in general hate genetic engineering, cloning, weapon testing on prisoners of war, and fun in general. You can’t clone humans…. you can’t genetically engineer and cybernetically enhance your kid to have super strength coupled with Einsteins IQ. You can’t kidnap people, remove their stomach, and sew their esophagus to their duodenum. Where will it end?

    I can’t even have a live mouse growing out of my ear – god knows I’ve pestered my GP about it often enough. (actually maybe I should be asking a vet)

    athgray
    Free Member

    I came out the right side of a 50/50 chance of developing Huntingtons Disease after genetic testing. This is great for me and my children who cannot develop it. My mum lives with it every day and my brother and nephew still live with with the risk daily.

    I am all for the use of embryonic cell research for hereditary diseases.

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Not a human embryo but we’ve been ‘playing god’* for millennia

    http://www.sciencealert.com/here-s-what-fruits-and-vegetables-looked-like-before-we-domesticated-them

    * I feel so dirty using that phrase

    eat_the_pudding
    Free Member

    Every time something like this comes up (e.g. enhanced crops/dolly the sheep), someone predictably predicts a dystopian future where everyone will be genetically modified to the detriment of the human race (or the benefit of some future nazi master race).

    But it remains true that:
    a) people produced traditionally via unskilled labour (no offence) will always outnumber any number of genetically enhanced posthumans, and
    b) ideology is probably not genetic and its hard to imagine any e.g. nazi/islamist genes that would make their politics more attractive unless its a general dumbing down and increase in violence throughout the world (which could probably be achieved more easily by adding lead to the water supply).

    In the meantime this technology will provide beneficial and life enhancing results for a small number of people with a limited number of conditions.

    Good 🙂

    hammyuk
    Free Member

    MrWoppit
    Free Member
    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    Every time something like this comes up (e.g. enhanced crops/dolly the sheep), someone predictably predicts a dystopian future where everyone will be genetically modified to the detriment of the human race (or the benefit of some future nazi master race).

    But it remains true that:
    a) people produced traditionally via unskilled labour (no offence) will always outnumber any number of genetically enhanced posthumans, and
    b) ideology is probably not genetic and its hard to imagine any e.g. nazi/islamist genes that would make their politics more attractive unless its a general dumbing down and increase in violence throughout the world (which could probably be achieved more easily by adding lead to the water supply).

    However, transhumanism does run the very real risk of further increasing economic stratification by creating a two-tiered human race for those that can afford it.

    willard
    Full Member

    So go the full ‘Sci-Fi’ and say that people can play all they want with gene manipulation, but not on this planet. They have to do it in orbit or on the moon, or colonise Mars if they want to experiment.

    Win:win for the human race.

    Nay-sayers get to keep the Earth pure, scientists and people that understand evolution get to go to other planets.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    However, transhumanism does run the very real risk of further increasing economic stratification by creating a two-tiered human race for those that can afford it.

    Difficult to see how that could be any more extreme than it already is!

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    Difficult to see how that could be any more extreme than it already is!

    You’re either a cuddly optimist or unimaginative…..

    😛

    So go the full ‘Sci-Fi’ and say that people can play all they want with gene manipulation, but not on this planet. They have to do it in orbit or on the moon, or colonise Mars if they want to experiment.

    Experimenting is fine, it’s governed or should be governed by ethics and social responsibility. Going all libertarian, opening it up to the free markets and allowing it to be used for anything other than disease is the issue.

    hammyuk
    Free Member

    Tom_W1987 – Member
    Going all libertarian, opening it up to the free markets and allowing it to be used for anything other than disease is the issue.

    Why?
    You know you really want the lad to have massive whanger 😆

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    He’ll have my genes for that…. 😆

    mrsfry
    Free Member

    Maybe the OP has a point. Remember Dr. Frank N. Furter

    It didn’t end well

    chewkw
    Free Member

    Genetic modification is good to prevent the possibility of utopian genes infestation … 😮

    nickc
    Full Member

    But we’ve kept out of playing God for sometime now

    Apart from modifying just about everything around us to suit our needs for about 2 million years or so, but yeah…I could see how you could make that statement

    hammyuk
    Free Member

    mrsfry – Member
    Maybe the OP has a point. Remember Dr. Frank N. Furter

    Pervert

Viewing 23 posts - 41 through 63 (of 63 total)

The topic ‘Genetically modifying a human embryo.’ is closed to new replies.