Timber
I understand the arguments and agree that virgin timber (good quality) shouldn’t be used for pellets. However, with current subsidies in place who can blame forest owners from cashing in?
Ironically, we are benefitting as a result due to the price rises – our technology now becomes a ‘no brainer’ – at least it seems to be for the more forward thinking panel producers. Some however, continue to burn their waste for fuel when they could recycle. I was just highlighting the apparent contradiction in panel manufacturers campaigning against virgin timber being burnt when they refuse to walk the walk with their own operations.
More generally, my main concern is that people seem ‘content’ that one user life has been gained from the timber, when IMO we should embed the carbon over and over where technically possible (MDF fibres can be re-used in new MDF production, thermal insulation and the like). Reassuringly we are now being approached by many ‘blue chips’ and retail chains that are fed up with being offered up incineration with energy recovery by their waste contractors as the most sustainable disposal route.
There is of course a valid argument for the burning of the very lowest grades of waste wood.