(^ good to see you’ve made it on here Nate ;) Hope someone can come in on your question)
I decided to see what the 29+ was all about (not that I hadn’t already had a taste of things on Stooge with 29+ up front)
So, a few weeks back I picked up a Trek Stache. Intention behind it was the Stache could be a little bigger at 21.5 and I could run a smaller stem
I have the Stooge set-up 27+
Must say right off the bat what a brilliant job of things Trek have done with the rigid Stache. The engineering, design and F+F is superb. Overall weight of the bike (21.5) is super low too (wheels-sets are particularly light) and quite a fair bit lighter than Stooge
I have previously run the Stooge with a 29+ front so overall the Stache has not been a massive change
The biggest difference was going 27+ on the Stooge – wow – agility…. and fun
Yes, the Stooge on 27+ is most certainly the more fun to ride bike. There I said it. Stache is supreme, no doubt, but is it ‘too’ good at what it does?? Stooge invites you to rag the bike a little more. Pop off here, manual there, try and jump this bit (my riding rarely sees both wheels off the ground I must add – I’m self employed)
It feels the better climber too. When riding with others I am more up with the front, and it’s just a racket going down
I don’t know, but just maybe if I had been able to demo the Stache for a good few days I may not have pulled the trigger. If you’ve got a clutch of 29er’s already Stache is not going to be a game changer, whereas going 27+ certainly is
My take at any rate
The bikes (yes, pure coincidence the colour’s are identical)