Forum search & shortcuts

You never actually ...
 

[Closed] You never actually own one

Posts: 11674
Full Member
 

That's possibly the most crass attempt at a humorous post I have seen on STW.

Well done, you have just reinforced my distaste for your personality


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 1:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Apologies

I do have an awful personality BTW


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 1:22 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think it's wonderful that there are companies about who make such astounding bits of engineering. And I think it's wonderful that there are very wealthy people with zero taste who keep buying them to keep the companies going 😀


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 1:25 am
Posts: 838
Free Member
 

More of a ulysses nadine djengis khan type of a guy if I'm honest ..


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 1:28 am
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

I find it distasteful that you find someone making a sound point with acerbic humour more distasteful than the fact that people can justify spending 50k on a ****ing wris****ch when that money could be spent on something a LOT more benificial to society, to mankind, to the world. This sort of extravagant expenditure is pretty much indicative of what's wrong with the human race, in my mind.

But; oh well, horses for courses.

Well done, you have just reinforced my distaste for your morality.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 1:29 am
Posts: 1668
Free Member
 

How do you know that the people likely to be able to afford a PP aren't also philanthropists who give a higher percentage of their income to charity than you do? See, we can all make generalisations.. 😉


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 1:44 am
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

Yet you all watch top gear and get a hard on when they thrash some bling round the track. 🙄
Oh wait it's technology benefitting all mankind and the planet. My mistake, I do apologise.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 7:08 am
Posts: 6118
Full Member
 

I own three reasonable watches although I didn't actually buy any of them. 1 was an 18 birthday present and I inherited 2.

The inherited ones i wear and remember my dad by and the 18 present I also enjoy wearing and will pass down to babybgoode when he's old enough.

None are truly daft money, most valuable is probably the Baume Mercier c. £3k but it is a beautiful piece of engineering. The workmanship that goes into a handmade high end watch is astonishing. They're not just knocked up overnight.

Can't say I'll be passing my £8 casio down to him or that I'd wear a g shock passed down to me in memory of my dad.

I fully get watches but doubt I could ever afford / justify huge sums of money on one. Would love a Breguet though and I think there are two types of expensive watch owners. Yes there are those who like to make a statement as to just how wealthy they are but then those who happen to like watches and can either a) afford them or b) acquire them as gifts etc.

Now a Louis Vitton handbag. That's obscene profiteering...


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 7:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But a £6000 bike will be marginally better than a £1000 bike and much netter than £100 BSO, however a £20 Lorus is a better timekeeper than a £50,000 Patek.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 8:03 am
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

That misses the point completely.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 8:16 am
Posts: 19914
Free Member
 

I know a guy who makes a good living out of trading in high end wrist watches. I'm assuming he know all about this brand, I know he's traded stuff far in excess of anything mentioned in this thread. I was talking to him about it once and asked if he wore one. "Err no" was the reply. "I wear a Casio G shock because I can do this with it" ....he takes it of and bangs it on the desk......


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 8:33 am
Posts: 12089
Full Member
 

But why would you spends upwards of 50gbp on a G-Shock when you can get a Decathlon watch for less than 15? Fools and their money etc.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 8:55 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do we believe that most people who buy them think about the history and workmanship?

Or do most think that the watches will act as a badge of membership of an elite international club?

Wonder who the ads are aimed at?

Back in the day, there perhaps used to be a genuine point in having a decent Rolex. Those days have gone. The meaning of these watches has changed.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 9:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Do we believe that most people who buy them think about the history and workmanship?

Of course!
[img] ?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=GkZZ8bf5zL1ZiijUmxa7QXu1LRQ0Lh7Pc07vdBhq4UD%2FBZike2Nj7uxlg6t8tLU8FaxkyAP%2Fq4ztpjj3JuPRuQ%3D%3D[/img]


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 9:38 am
Posts: 1751
Full Member
 

But why would you spends upwards of 50gbp on a G-Shock when you can get a Decathlon watch for less than 15? Fools and their money etc.
it's an order of magnitude thing though, isn't it. Some of the figures bandied about on this thread are frankly [i]obscene[/i]. It's being said that the watches are 'investments', which basically means that it's an ostentatious way to visibly park a large amount of cash on the wrist for all to see. If someone has enough money to do that, then they have too much money. Simple as that. As a by the by, the bizarre upshot of this situation is that if you're rich, even your bloody wrist watch earns you money for doing **** all, whilst the poorest workers in society slave away their entire life for the same effect. Society is truly screwed; the global game of monopoly has entered its final stage and it's only a matter of time before the poorest players upturn the board with a hearty '**** this shit!'. There will be blood.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 10:17 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The quoted prices must be wrong, I've seen loads of them available in Bangkok for around £20 😉


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 10:26 am
Posts: 39744
Free Member
 

Tbh i thought the title of this thread was a revelation about cars rented on pcp ......


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 10:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well when the revolution comes as none of us would be seen with rubbish bombers anymore we will all be using pikes to club with. Not that we are elitist money wasting bike snobs or anything.....


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 10:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've got a wrist bauble and I love it. My money my choice. It's not a patek though, my status requirements are not that high 🙄


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 10:37 am
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

A few of the buy-to-let brigade on here could afford one, probably a better return too. 😆


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 11:02 am
 LeeW
Posts: 2119
Free Member
 

I save what's left of my disposable income (after I've donated to various orphanariums and hedgehog sanctuaries) and spend it on what ever I fancy. I, like most people on here work hard for my money and I'll do what ever I want with it. Currently saving for an AP Royal Oak.

For me, high end watches are a celebration of engineering, just find one that fits your style.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 11:06 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That's a dissapointing view LeeW, don't you walk around in a tshirt in even the depths of winter to show off your wrist status. That's totally wrong according to most of the above, shame on you!


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 11:13 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

People can spend their money on whatever they choose. I don't see the problem in that at all.
If you're "in to" something, watches, bikes, cars, cameras etc it's easy to justify an extravagant purchase, just don't expect anyone else to understand.
Ultimately, why should you give a shit anyway.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 11:26 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

But it would appear those who don't have a wrist bauble on here give a shit more than those that do. I also have a hottub but I can't wear that on my wrist which is a shame.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 11:29 am
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

As Spike Milligan said.

"Money can't buy you happiness, but it does bring you a more pleasant form of misery.”


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 11:44 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pass me the salt for all these chips! 😆


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 12:53 pm
Posts: 660
Free Member
 

There's a lot of talk if engineering miracles in these watches as if there is a team of Swiss geniuses sat around a workbench. I read recently that a lot of the high end brand watches use the same movement bought in from a third party. If its so good why do they advertise?


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 2:28 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I read recently that a lot of the high end brand watches use the same movement bought in from a third party. If its so good why do they advertise?

I don't think so. High end will have in-house movements.
It's like the rolex/tudor thing. They are made to similar standards (by Rolex) but the Tudors have 3rd party movements, hence being cheaper. I'd be surprised to see a truly high end watch with an ETA movement. Whether the in-house movements are any better, well that's a different conversation.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 2:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I won't take a picture of me driving my 100k Overfinch to the park to ride my 8k Bronson along the canal path whilst reading the time on my 20k Rolex

Hahah


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 2:45 pm
Posts: 6118
Full Member
 

Some do. Omega, Breitling and Tag (I think) have been bought by Swatch and whilst they used to be excellent are now overpriced mass engineered shit.

Rolex, Breguet, Baume Mercies and a host of others still make their own very high quality, bespoke movements.

Like anything Beats Headphones, Apple etc. Some overcharge for what you're buying but some watches are genuine works of art. Have a look at the work that goes in to a Breguet watch face...


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 2:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Omega, Breitling and Tag

Are these still regarded as "high end"?


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 3:08 pm
Posts: 314
Free Member
 

According to Swatch they are:
[url= http://www.swatchgroup.com/en/brands_and_companies/watches_and_jewelry ]http://www.swatchgroup.com/en/brands_and_companies/watches_and_jewelry[/url]


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 3:30 pm
 LeeW
Posts: 2119
Free Member
 

Isn't Tag owned by LVMH?

wrightyson - Member

That's a dissapointing view LeeW, don't you walk around in a tshirt in even the depths of winter to show off your wrist status. That's totally wrong according to most of the above, shame on you!

I'm invariably in short sleeves in the "depths of winter" as it rarely drops below 25degC here.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 3:52 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

So is the fact that swatch now own omega that my watch is over a grand dearer than it was 5 years ago?


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:03 pm
Posts: 6118
Full Member
 

Eugh, that's Breguet off my wishlist...

That said I suppose Rolls Royce is just BMW and they are exquisite watches...


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:10 pm
 LeeW
Posts: 2119
Free Member
 

Cost of manufacturing Wrighty, all that engineering costs money you know.

I think they've been Swatch for nearly 20 years too.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:12 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Most of the prestige watch manufacturers now use 'in house' movements. A lot of them did use ETA movements but I guess they were struggling to justify the prices by using relatively movements. Panerai in particular being a case in point. Breitling too.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:13 pm
 LeeW
Posts: 2119
Free Member
 

Up until around 10 years ago all mainsprings were manufactured by a company owned by Swatch group, they were the only people who had the machines and the skills to make them - if I remember correctly all the springs for these 'prestige' movements were made from a kilo of this material every year. Swatch got bored, told everyone that they were going to stop selling them from 2008 or so. Everyone else complained and Swatch were forced/encouraged/or they agreed they would phase the withdrawal over X years. Hence a lot of companies starting to make their own complete movements rather than using ETA's or Valjoux kits.*

*writing this from memory so it may be a little incorrect but the gist is about right.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:24 pm
Posts: 21027
 

Want an exquisitely manufactured piece of engineering, with a fascinating story behind it?
Want it to cost a LOT more then a newer, digital, better functioning equivalent with 100s more features?
Want laymen to not have a clue what the thing is?
Want to actually use it, rather than just look at it on your wrist?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

yep that make no sense. well done 🙄

I always get upset by the hate on here for that reasons Mods i would like to have my IP removed from the forum and be placed on the banned list.

I no longer want to be in the same room as some of the children on here.

Cheers

this may help ****


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:36 pm
Posts: 21027
 

YAAAY! a flounce! Not seen one of those for a while!

TTFN Princess xx


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Nice Flounce!

I see you already have the foil hat 😉


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:50 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:50 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

A flounce? What about? Surely if you're a mug that buys expensive watches you can just stare it in the face and nod sagely that you're better than everyone else.


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:51 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

Why are you more of a mug buying an expensive watch over buying an expensive bike, whisky, tv, hifi etc ?
Surely it doesn't matter what people spend their money on?


 
Posted : 31/12/2015 4:55 pm
Page 2 / 6