If I'd known I was arguing with a woman I'd have used smaller words
Yes, yours were huge, massive, honestly they were the biggest i've ever seen! I'm surprised you managed to fit them in, and they were so beautiful and long. They were amaaaaazing! Don't ever stop using them with me, etc. etc.
All i know is that they are a touchy lot
Aparently, they are not angry, they are just very easy to irratate
been arguing with an atheist today - you can't win
the way i look at it, either you are a beleiver or you are not a beleiver
if you are not a beleiver, then don't worry about - find something else to get angry about
i couldn't give a rats arse, unless someone starts sprouting rubbish at me, then they can f*ck right off
see, even an agnostic like me can get angry!!
Yes, yours were huge, massive, honestly they were the biggest i've ever seen! I'm surprised you managed to fit them in, and they were so beautiful and long. They were amaaaaazing! Don't ever stop using them with me, etc. etc.
[autoresponse]
Yes dear.
[/autoresponse]
Carling Cup semi final draw:
Cardiff V Crystal Palace
Man City V Liverpool.
Knew it. 😆
Crystal Palace though eh? At Old Trafford an' all! 😮
If football is a religion, I'm an atheist.
Binners in't happy, is he? 🙁
Knew it.
Effin, from the Carling Cup site...
The semi-finals will be played over two legs.
First leg - week commencing 9th January.
Second leg - week commencing 23rd January.
Yeah, but we still get City. Not Cardiff or Palace.
Will be a tough two legs. Let's hope they've cracked by then. Mind you, we shooduv had 'em on Sunday tbh. Had it not bin for Joe Hart, we'duv done 'em. They are beatable, for sure.
you can't drag this thread out just to reach, how do you say, a fahzand? you've changed topic and i call foul!!
you can't drag this thread out just to reach, how do you say, a fahzand?
But, but, I've never had a 1000 post thread. Go on, go on, go on.
i call foul!!
Ref sez 'play on'.
Anyway, I did try to drag it back on track. Is anybody going to claim to be football agnostic?
I don't like the new BBC website layout. Only just got used to the last one. Why they keep changing it so often?
The thread is dead, Fred. No one was able to show a link between the catholic church and Aids in Africa, or anywhere else. The irony being that those who insisted on that connection, did so without any proof, basing their ideas on belief. Yet mocked others for their belief in a God without proof.
So, ultimately, it's over and I won.
Thanks for playing.
So, ultimately, it's over and I won.
For negative values of 'won'.
Anyway, God - he's smashing isnt he?
No, that's the LHC you're thinking of.
Anyway, God - he's smashing isnt he?
No, that's the Old Testament God you're thinking of. The New Testament God is far less destructive, unless you count earthquakes and famine and stuff
What is this LHC you speak of cougar?
Is Google down?
I'm not going to all that bother cougar! And, Charlie, "God - he's smitey" doesnt have quite the same ring to it. 😉
Typing three letters into Google is a bother? Good heavens. Do you tie your own shoelaces or are do you have people to do that too? (-:
I did google it cougar, I was just being awkward. It was sciencey! Now I'm just off out to bury some big bones to confuse the creationists. 😀
The thread is dead, Fred. No one was able to show a link between the catholic church and Aids in Africa, or anywhere else. The irony being that those who insisted on that connection, did so without any proof, basing their ideas on belief. Yet mocked others for their belief in a God without proof.So, ultimately, it's over and I won.
You appear to have completely missed the point of this thread. Which is a shame as you'll have to go right back to the beginning and start all over again.
You appear to have completely missed the point of this thread.
You appear to think this thread had a point, you need to read the posts randomly and see if the arguments make more sense that way.
burying big bones
careful now, dont let this thread get pulled by the mods for being mysogamthingy!
😀
I was just being awkward
Ah yes, silly me, this is the Internet.
I think that its OK to believe in god, if you want to, and its ok not to, if you dont want to.
I think that its OK to believe in god, if you want to, and its ok not to, if you dont want to.
What the hell are you doing on here with your open even minded views 😆
dogmatix: I don't think anyone on the thread has argued otherwise.
The trouble arises because "private beliefs" (on both sides) often spill out into public areas like laws, education and justice.
is it not more because one lot are wrong and they then use this values system to impose values on the others
I have not fiorgiven them for what they did to Galileo
Did he do the Fandango?
I think you'll find it works both ways. Haven't forgiven the Belgians for what they did to Tyndale
yay - it's going again (how do we know how many posts?)
8 'undred
(found it)
edited - double post
Did he do the Fandango?
NO that was scaramouche
The trouble arises because "private beliefs" (on both sides) often spill out into public areas like laws, education and justice.
Atheism isn't a belief, it's knowledge
dogmatix: I don't think anyone on the thread has argued otherwise.
Surely there must be somebody in 800 posts? Somebody go and have a check.
Wiktionary offers
(narrowly) Belief that no deities exist (sometimes, excluding other religious beliefs). ?[quotations ?]
CharlieMungus - Member
The trouble arises because "private beliefs" (on both sides) often spill out into public areas like laws, education and justice.
Atheism isn't a belief, it's knowledge
Actually, I don't think that even Richard Dawkins would agree with you on that, Mr Mungus.
But whatever.
can't be bothered to read the thread.did I miss anything?
Actually, I don't think that even Richard Dawkins would agree with you on that, Mr Mungus.But whatever.
So, you're saying Atheism is just a belief.
No. I'm saying that by any definition of knowledge, neither theism nor atheism count as such.
As any good epistemologist would say.