should you really be teaching children that a fat jolly man watches/stalks all year to see if they have been good and he'll then visit them at night and empty his sack. šÆ
alternatively teach them about mithras as it's his birthday that the zombie jew chappy who couldn't hold marbles nicked. š
good one Kunstler
Wait! Isn't Santa Claus one of those religious saint types?
Stoner - your OP seems to suggest that the root of this problem is that your wife has faith and you don't. I don't feel for a second that Santa and Jesus can't live in harmony in the mind of your offspring
It's just one of many idiosyncrasies born of bringing up a child in the UK - it's normal, it's expected and why not?
Well that's you going to hell š š š
The theologies of both Father Christmas (not Santa, this isn't Power Cable, Idaho)
Pretty sure Father Christmas is an English thing, Scotland use Santa almost exclusively and always have
Childhood is really good, but too short.
White wine in the sun is a lush song. Loved mrs toasts description of Jesus!
Still Santa though, he's not bothered if you're queer
Still Santa though, he's not bothered if you're queer
What, and Jesus is ? Oh dear, I sense a trip in the Thought Police panda car for that one.
I've been collared for expressing that thought crime before.
Lying to your kids šÆ and filling their heads with nonsense, in my book it's right up there with plopping them down in front of the TV, so they can become well balanced, deranged lunatics in a few years.
We don't do the kids of this day and age any favours, up until they're 16 they live in lala land, with no real grasp of the world. Then at 16 they're supposed to become adults over night šÆ .
I think the point of this time of year is to reflect on what's happend to us and learn all we can, from our experiences and contemplation and also to strengthen the bonds that we have with the people who make our lives worth living š
AKA the people who can loan us stuff when we really need it and the people we trust enough to loan stuff too š
HoHoHo!
What, and Jesus is ? Oh dear, I sense a trip in the Thought Police panda car for that one.
The book he's a character in seems fairly clear on the subject.
Lying to your kids and filling their heads with nonsense.............We don't do the kids of this day and age any favours, up until they're 16 they live in lala land
You know kids who believe in Santa until they're 16 ? šÆ
The book he's a character in seems fairly clear on the subject
A fact not lost on me, as I've been chastised for suggesting as much. Something which you might have picked up on had you read the whole post.
School had a go at us when my daughter who was 7 at the time informed class quite casually that Santa was just made up by parents - there were a few tears and angry parents šÆ
A fact not lost on me, as I've been chastised for suggesting as much. Something which you might have picked up on had you read the whole post.
Ah, I see. In that case I fully endorse your subtle point š
I didn't believe any of it when I was a nipper.
I didn't let on.........
I knew where the prezzies were hidden! š
there's no place for 7 year old children to have their heads filled with such nonsense as Santa. is there no room on the curriculum at that age for quantum physics or maybe learning about the holocaust ?
š
What happens when Stoner Jr loses teeth? Does the tooth fairy visit?
He'll soon work out it's all tosh. But that doesn't matter. Kids are are very good at getting enjoyment from things that know are not real, they enjoy going along with the game just for the ride.
As for Jesus nonsense. Kids get a sharp reminder from me that it's not to be believed and not to waste too much of their attention on it. My 7 year old treats RE as a bit of an irritation, but it's also part of her education to understand that everything teachers tell her is not necessarily true. She's getting good at that, it doesn't stop her enjoying the Nativity play. - It's a fairy tale.
Having thought about this carefully I think you should teach your child to believe in Tim Minchin . He looks the part and has a lot more that's good and true about him than either of the Myths
Which one is most likely to leave some biking-related goodies under the tree on the 25th...though i'm very grateful for the other fella for sorting out some holidays at this time of year...
sorting out some holidays at this time of year
he didnt though. He just did the re-branding exercise.
He accpepts Jesus lived
Why?
isnt there sufficient historical record of the existence of some annoying preachy bugger around that time in the middle east?
His 12-strong PR team saw to the rest.
Nope. Hearsay only.
bit more than hearsay though?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
Erm, no.
"There is no evidence for the existence of Jesus that comes from his timeāno writings or artifacts of his, no accounts of him written in his lifetime"
Woppit is Stalin............all "inconvenient persons" are simply deemed to have never existed in the first place
There..................that should sort it out. Simple really.
bit more than hearsay though?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
Stoner I'm not sure if you read the same article as the one you refer to there, because I a haven't found anything in that article that makes the case for Jesus being any more than hearsay. Funny though because despite being a fundamental atheist, I always thought the the person called Jesus did exist..
der double post
Steady on toys, do not call down the wrath of the one who sees and knows all, upon your unworthy head...
Yeah I think he did that already. I'm shorter than most people..
"There is no evidence for the existence of Jesus that comes from his timeāno writings or artifacts of his, no accounts of him written in his lifetime"
There's, apparently, more evidence for the existence of Jesus than there is for Julius Caesar.
Jesus will do far more damage to your kid's life than finding out Father Christmas isn't real at age 9 or whatever.
Father Christmas all the way.
Julius Caesar
Who's he when he's at home ?
I'm pretty pro wikipedia's articles (science especially) but I wouldn't trust anything an article like that said.
you just have to look at the discussion page to get a feeling for it...
There's, apparently, more evidence for the existence of Jesus than there is for Julius Caesar.
Ah mike seems thats an urban myth, do you not trust google?
[url= http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/exist.html ]clicky [/url]
[url= http://mythicpast.blogspot.com/2006/02/historicity-of-julius-caesar.html ]more debunking[/url]
Julius Caesar and Jesus Christ had the same initials. Coincidence? I don't think so...
As an avowed atheist myself I assure the forum that any suggestion that Jesus was a top dude by me is wholly accidental. I did, obviously erroneously, however believe that there was evidence of someone broadly fitting his description doing the rounds about 2000 yrs ago.
Ah mike seems thats an urban myth, do you not trust google?
Not something I've ever cared about to look up, to be honest š
I'm pretty pro wikipedia's articles (science especially) but I wouldn't trust anything an article like that said.
Religion is one thing to not trust on Wikipedia. Along with politics, evolution, etc.
take them to see this and get some proper santa down them
while you're at it, check out the iron sky trailer on the side bar.
space nazis. on the moon.
what's not to like?
Hearsay?
What a load of rubbish.
John knew him personally, and wrote down his experiences. As did Luke. And Matthew, Oh, and Mark.
The idea that there's no evidence for the existence of Jesus is risible.
In any event, there's more sense in just one verse of the Bible than in a thousand posts on this crappy forum.
In any event, there's more sense in just one verse of the Bible than in a thousand posts on this crappy forum.
[i]
However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way.[/i] [b](Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT)[/b]


