Forum menu
What tech innovatio...
 

[Closed] What tech innovation are you waiting for (not bikes)?

Posts: 11642
Full Member
 

I'm waiting on stem cell treatment to be available for a reasonable price rather than the many £1000's it is at the moment.


 
Posted : 01/11/2016 6:30 pm
Posts: 665
Free Member
 

An office coffee machine that can make barrista quality espresso & rejects crap beans.


 
Posted : 01/11/2016 8:58 pm
Posts: 5828
Full Member
 

Efficient production of hydrogen so we can get rid of petrol cars and use hydrogen fuel cells


 
Posted : 01/11/2016 9:07 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

The new forum.


 
Posted : 01/11/2016 9:09 pm
Posts: 31206
Full Member
 

Aren't there [i]other[/i] issues to overcome with using hydrogen?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 01/11/2016 9:13 pm
Posts: 3072
Free Member
 

Self driving cars will limit humans driving, the insurance premiums would be immense to allow a human to drive, years off thankfully


 
Posted : 01/11/2016 9:20 pm
Posts: 1712
Free Member
 

[url= https://www.ted.com/talks/eric_giler_demos_wireless_electricity?language=en ]WiTricity seem to be cracking the power through the air problem[/url]

- about 7:25 into this TED talk.

http://witricity.com/


 
Posted : 01/11/2016 9:23 pm
Posts: 10634
Full Member
 

Affordable (for home use), effective, 3D printers capable of depositing steel or titanium.

85% efficient solar panels.

A space elevator.

Nuclear fusion.


 
Posted : 01/11/2016 9:27 pm
Posts: 2367
Free Member
 

I don't give a toss about the phone and computer stuff as that already does way more than I need it to, but a pair of walking boots they dry themselves like in BTTF2 would be quite useful.

+

For this forum to remember you when you sign in.
Apparently it's harder to do this than invent teleportation.


 
Posted : 01/11/2016 10:30 pm
 DezB
Posts: 54367
Free Member
 

Urine powered vehicles. Just think of the current wastage...


 
Posted : 02/11/2016 10:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=whatyadoinsucka ]Self driving cars will limit humans driving, the insurance premiums would be immense to allow a human to drive, years off thankfully

You're thankful that 3000 people a year are killed (in the UK)?


 
Posted : 02/11/2016 2:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[quote=stuey ]WiTricity seem to be cracking the power through the air problem
- about 7:25 into this TED talk.
> http://witricity.com/
br />

Hmm - there wasn't very much gap between Tx and Rx, and the devices only powered up when in the right place. It's not exactly creating the sort of charging environment people seem to want (or even what he's claiming for it).


 
Posted : 02/11/2016 2:23 pm
Posts: 1485
Free Member
 

Wholemeal crumpets in sainsburys.

Cost effective, highly insulated, lightweight building materials that can be fitted to existing buildings.


 
Posted : 04/11/2016 3:30 pm
Posts: 10960
Full Member
 

Either a way of feeding the world's population as it grows, or an ethical way of allowing medicine to improve but keeping the global population at a sustainable level.

And Joe 90s glasses so I can download peaty or Danny Macaskill or whoever I need at the time. But without the glasses because that causes a lot of bother.


 
Posted : 04/11/2016 5:41 pm
Posts: 33964
Full Member
 

Great story, but there've been plenty of geniuses since then and they are all of the opinion that beaming power to devices is not practically possible.

I'm no engineer, but the main stumbling blocks would seem to be the inverse square law, and the same issue that microwave transmission has: cooking any living object within a few metres of the charger, like high-power radar, or television transmitter masts.
I could be wrong on the latter, but I think I'm right.


 
Posted : 04/11/2016 6:36 pm
Posts: 91165
Free Member
 

I'm no engineer, but the main stumbling blocks would seem to be the inverse square law

Well you'd focus the beam to avoid that. I think Tesla's idea was wireles power transmission between receiving stations, like they do for communications - instead of long wires. To do it for a device, wherever you are, you'd have to have focusable beams directed at the device. Not impossible, but daft given that anything in the wayof that beam would get a full dose. Every electronic item would need huge shielding. Although if your coffee was getting cold you could just put it between your phone and the transmitter and get it warmed up 🙂


 
Posted : 04/11/2016 6:43 pm
Posts: 91165
Free Member
 

Wholemeal crumpets in sainsburys.

Cost effective, highly insulated, lightweight building materials that can be fitted to existing buildings.

Are you talking about the same thing?


 
Posted : 04/11/2016 6:44 pm
Posts: 33964
Full Member
 

A space elevator.

First you need a single molecule filament fibre that can be woven into a cable, or maybe synthetic diamond mono-crystal. Then the cable/s have to be twice as long as the distance to the orbital station as a counterbalance.*
*See Arthur C Clarke, Larry Niven, Neil Stephenson and other SF writers.
Thanks, Mol, you've clarified my thinking; I thought I was on the right track, but I don't know quite enough about the details.
Basically, if you're going to those lengths, a cable is just so much simpler! 😀


 
Posted : 04/11/2016 6:59 pm
Posts: 1485
Free Member
 

Molgrips, was an attempt at a list but I ran out of steam due to a lack of quality crumpet in my life.


 
Posted : 04/11/2016 7:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Wrist mounted, touch-screen, moving map GPS. My Foretrex 401 is great, but that would be next level.


 
Posted : 04/11/2016 7:08 pm
Posts: 23334
Free Member
 

^^^

Garmin epix?


 
Posted : 04/11/2016 7:12 pm
Posts: 8161
Free Member
 

Quantum computing 🙂

The singularity.

One of those things from Star Trek that makes food etc when asked.

Shoes that fit my feet, 3D printed probably.

3D printed organs.

Gene therapy.

The Culture.

...and Non-Newtonian Brie. That's a total winner right there.

Ohohohoh, a forum that supports webM 😛


 
Posted : 04/11/2016 7:20 pm
Page 3 / 3