I think we're starting to see a bit of blow back in regards to AI use - in that in an employment context AI has no responsibility for its mistakes - if you rely on, sell, publish, implement AI output the oversights and shortcomings are all yours.
Ask the chief of West Midlands Police for instance, or lawyers who are putting forward completely fictional case law forward in court. Or the mural artist in Glasgow who's rendering for a Scottish landscape featured a Bald Eagle.
AI will make all the same errors that lazy people make, and given that lazy people are attracted to AI they're the people who'll fail in their diligence to verify the outputs they're given
Alll the various AI / LLM services are vying for dominance and becuase of that they all have an inbuilt seduction-  they're configured to  flatter the user with their output. Users feel too good about the outputs they receive to properly interrogate them. But the egg ends up on their face if they put that output infront of any more discearning audience.
