Forum menu
Wedding Photographe...
 

[Closed] Wedding Photographers

Posts: 13594
Free Member
 

I've done a couple of weddings and it's bloody hard work and a lot of stress as you only get one chance for a lot of the shots. I think £1k is fair for a skilled photographer.


 
Posted : 15/10/2010 9:04 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What a load of cr** how often do you lot look at your £2000 a piece pictures? Wonder what you do with them when you get divorced?? Getting friends to take snaps you will end up with far nicer photos than cheesy professional pics and guests will be happy they don't have to hang around for hours posing and starving. Sorry but IMO they are a horrific rip off, but each to their own.


 
Posted : 15/10/2010 9:22 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Think its got a lot to do with not being the odd one out and an element of showing off.

People are very worried what others think and wouldn't want to be seen as having a cut price wedding. Too much pressure with all the social networking sites, soon as they get the pics they are on Facebook to show/show off to their friends
The whole wedding business has got out of hand, more about what friends and family will think than enjoying the day because its what the couple want. Pure hypocrisy to get married in church when you never step foot in the place, church themselves are just as bad by taking the money.

Did you enjoy a holiday any less because the pics were crap, of course not because its the memories that matters.

Can't blame the wedding photographers for charging what they do if they can get it, but a competent amateur can take photos that are more than adequate to keep as a reminder of the happy day


 
Posted : 15/10/2010 9:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Everything to do with weddings is a rip off

Try getting a quote for a birthday party at a hotel & then try a quote for a wedding with the same food etc.


 
Posted : 15/10/2010 9:53 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Uplink yup I agree! that's probably why I'm too pi**y to get married plus what is going to change? (agree possibly different if kids are in the picture)


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 12:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I wouldn't waste money on a wedding photographer. Your mates must be able to take enough decent photos between them.Anyway most marriages don't last anyway so spend the money you save on a new bike!!


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 12:52 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

but a competent amateur can take photos that are more than adequate to keep as a reminder of the happy day

a cake from greggs will be more than adequate as a wedding cake.
cans of that cheap lager from aldi and some asti-spumante will be more than adequate to get people pissed on the wedding day.
a people carrier from the local taxi firm will be more than adequate as a wedding car (and you fit more people in)
the scout hut will be more than adequate as a venue on your happy day.
a word doc printed out at work will be more than adequate as an invitation to your wedding.
an ipod and your stereo is more than adequate to dance to in the evening.
frozen sausage rolls from iceland and a catering tub of houmous and some pitta bread is more than adequate to feed your wedding guests.


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 12:58 pm
Posts: 5976
Free Member
 

a cake from greggs will be more than adequate as a wedding cake.
cans of that cheap lager from aldi and some asti-spumante will be more than adequate to get people pissed on the wedding day.
a people carrier from the local taxi firm will be more than adequate as a wedding car (and you fit more people in)
the scout hut will be more than adequate as a venue on your happy day.
a word doc printed out at work will be more than adequate as an invitation to your wedding.
an ipod and your stereo is more than adequate to dance to in the evening.
frozen sausage rolls from iceland and a catering tub of houmous and some pitta bread is more than adequate to feed your wedding guests.

The only important thing is that you are in love with each other. The rest is just window dressing.


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 1:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

a cake from greggs will be more than adequate as a wedding cake.
cans of that cheap lager from aldi and some asti-spumante will be more than adequate to get people pissed on the wedding day.
a people carrier from the local taxi firm will be more than adequate as a wedding car (and you fit more people in)
the scout hut will be more than adequate as a venue on your happy day.
a word doc printed out at work will be more than adequate as an invitation to your wedding.
an ipod and your stereo is more than adequate to dance to in the evening.
frozen sausage rolls from iceland and a catering tub of houmous and some pitta bread is more than adequate to feed your wedding guests.

🙂

To all those who think £1000 is a rip off for a [i]good[/i] wedding photographer...wake up and don't be so chuffin tight.

As has already been said, there is way more to it than turning up on the day, taking a load of shots and then uploading them onto a CD. Anyone who thinks that's what a decent pro photographer does is a complete plum. It's usually about 3 days work, has a fair few costs involved and is very high risk/stressful.

If you don't care about the pictures from the day and would honestly be happy with shots taken by relatives etc then fine, £1000 is going to seem like a lot so don't bother. If you want some good pro quality shots then don't ever think that an amateur could do a good job unless you know for sure they have done plenty of weddings before and their work is top notch. Wedding photography is not like shooting in a controlled environment and this is where an inexperienced amateur will fall (very) short.

Always go for a photographer based on recommendation, that way you know what you'll get in terms of the whole package/experience. Don't go on website pics alone, they would have put their best pics up which could be 10 out of a 1000 absolute shockers.


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 1:23 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

The only important thing is that you are in love with each other. The rest is just window dressing.

don't bother with getting married then.


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 1:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've shot a few weddings for friends, as they've liked my style. Its amazing how those who dont want group photos suddenly do on the day (pressure from parents and family being the reason), and how difficult it is to round up a group for a picture (there are ways and means around this).

If you want candid shots, then any decent amateur can make a good go of these. More formal, well lit, posed portraits that are well composed and executed are where a pro will earn their money.

And the fee is not just for what you see on the day. I meet my clients before hand, discuss their wants and get across how I do things to see if we will work together. I also stay well into the evening do to get pics of the party atmosphere, and then there is the post processing which can take from hours to days.

Pictures I take of my clients are always given to them, they can then print as many as they like, or use them as they will. Copywrite will remain mine though.


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 1:53 pm
Posts: 5976
Free Member
 

So for you Mr Smith, a wedding is about cake, booze, cars, paperwork, music and food. Fair enough.


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 2:18 pm
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

So for you Mr Smith, a wedding is about cake, booze, cars, paperwork, music and food. Fair enough.

No. people/wine/food in that order. couldn't give a toss about the other stuff.


 
Posted : 17/10/2010 2:25 pm
Page 2 / 2