Forum menu
War of the World Su...
 

[Closed] War of the World Sun 9pm

Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

Haven’t seen it but I do have 3 questions please:

1. Did they kick the trend and forego the predictable ‘intensely-drab’ turquoise and brown video filter that seems to have been en vogue for over a decade now ?
2. Is it as good as the Tom Cruise one?
3. Is Mary Poppins in it?

Two no’s is a no for me I’m afraid.


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 10:23 am
Posts: 3829
Free Member
 

Malvern Rider.
I might be in a minority here but I thought the Tom Cruise version was actually pretty good...a modern take on the book but at least it was faithful and dramatic. I was genuinely excited when I saw the Beeb were doing a version - I could not have been more disappointed. Terrible script, acting, effects, camera work and characters you really didn’t a toss about. Remember the ‘Why Don’t You?’ theme? Never been more apt when referring to this pile of arse.


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 11:20 am
Posts: 12332
Full Member
 

Yeah, apart from the second half of episode 2, it was awful.

The physics of the aliens being able to walk on 3 wide set legs when the centre of gravity was clearly central bothered me. When you are thinking about details like that, the story has obviously lost you.


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 11:26 am
Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

Malvern Rider.
I might be in a minority here but I thought the Tom Cruise version was actually pretty good

Me too. The building storm-clouds at the beginning is epic and very well done. And I thrilled at the 1953 one as a kid, it scared the jeebs out of me especially the creepy fingers over the shoulder/blood-soaked scarf bit. *shudder*. Floating-saucer-vacuum-cleaner-streetlights spitting fiery death!


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 11:46 am
Posts: 3351
Free Member
 

Haven’t seen it but I do have 3 questions please:

1. Did they kick the trend and forego the predictable ‘intensely-drab’ turquoise and brown video filter that seems to have been en vogue for over a decade now ?

If you like all of the interior and a lot of exterior shots artificially darkened to the point that you can't see what's going on then you're in for a huge treat with episodes two and three. The latter was especially obnoxious in this respect.

2. Is it as good as the Tom Cruise one?

As much as I was disappointed by the Spielberg WoTW, there was a steady ratcheting up of tension and you invested some emotion in the fate of the characters (screaming snotbrat kid aside). In parts, the BBC/Mammoth's production was good - episode two the best of the three. There are flash forward scenes to some unspecified time after the Martians all got the shits and died, to a ruined Earth overrun with Martian red weed and turned into a global dustbowl. Episodes 1 & 2 managed to pull that off to some degree, but those in episode 3 ruined it - overly long and destroyed the narrative. Far too many shots of Eleanor Tomlinson looking sad at the camera shot through a red/brown filter.

3. Is Mary Poppins in it?

Well, after a reasonable start with episodes 1 & 2, if the final instalment had been a Julie Andrews musical it would still have only been marginally less rubbish. And I detest musicals.


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 11:50 am
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

It's the typical BBC approach of over-using what you see as your main asset (Poldark's Eleanor Tomlinson in this case). The script appeared to have been written to pointlessly include her as often as possible.

See also Killing Eve's by-the-numbers second series, and Line of Duty, which should have been quietly put to sleep after series 3, Guvnor.


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 12:00 pm
Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

Thanks PJM. I’ll give it a miss.

if the final instalment had been a Julie Andrews

Yes there are two paths we can go by, but in the long run...

m+1 🙂


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 12:27 pm
Posts: 18029
Full Member
 

I almost turned it off when they made George state the bleeding obvious parallel between the British empire and the Martians half way through

But that parallel is explicitly made in the book, so why should it be left out?


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 12:43 pm
Posts: 4593
Free Member
 

watched episode 1 at the weekend. thought it was ok. not sure about the flash-forwards to the post apocalyptic wasteland, but will give EP2 a go at some point.

MrsDoris is a big fan of the book and was quite disappointed though.


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 1:09 pm
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

Malvern Rider.
I might be in a minority here but I thought the Tom Cruise version was actually pretty good

Me too. The building storm-clouds at the beginning is epic and very well done. And I thrilled at the 1953 one as a kid, it scared the jeebs out of me especially the creepy fingers over the shoulder/blood-soaked scarf bit. *shudder*. Floating-saucer-vacuum-cleaner-streetlights spitting fiery death!

The Tom Cruise one is very good.

I honestly don’t know why some of you bothered to watch the BBC’s hatched/bodged job of WotW.

Maybe you just like moaning.

🤷‍♂️


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 1:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I've recorded all three episodes but based on the opinions here I won't waste my time watching them. I've been a fan of the book since I read it in my teens and have been waiting (50 years) for someone to take a simple, classic story and film it honestly. How hard can that be?


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 1:30 pm
 Drac
Posts: 50615
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

🤪🤪🤪 ^^

brilliant 🤣👏


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 1:47 pm
Posts: 20666
Full Member
 

I only watched Episode 1 because all the village scenes were filmed in Great Budworth which is fairly local to me. Managed to sit through about 15 minutes of Episode 2 before getting bored with it all. And the special effects were mostly awful.

Judging from the comments above, I'm glad I didn't stick with it!


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 1:49 pm
Posts: 1096
Full Member
 

1. Did they kick the trend and forego the predictable ‘intensely-drab’ turquoise and brown video filter that seems to have been en vogue for over a decade now ?


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 1:52 pm
Posts: 5182
Free Member
 

^ arggghhhh it drives me mad. Knew I wouldn’t have been the first to notice. Not that I haven’t enjoyed cross-processed film-style PS actions on my own work back in the day when digital photography was evolving. But even then, there are so many almost infinite options to use other than this bloody murk and turq malarkey! It’s just too much ketchup on the chips by now. Fresh chips please.


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 2:08 pm
Posts: 584
Full Member
 

They should have called it Bore of the Worlds.


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 2:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I almost turned it off when they made George state the bleeding obvious parallel between the British empire and the Martians half way through

But that parallel is explicitly made in the book, so why should it be left out?

It should be (and was) in there - that was the point of the book. It was the cack-handed way that particular scene was done. They might has well have got George to turn to camera and quote directly from a copy of York notes, or whatever it is kids use these days.

Mind you, it did result in the only interesting exchange in the whole episode - when George's brother told him to grow a pair.


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 2:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

rascal

Member
Malvern Rider.
I might be in a minority here but I thought the Tom Cruise version was actually pretty good

tom cruise yin is a good film.


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 3:38 pm
Posts: 19543
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Again I wasted 1 hour of my life as I just have to watch it 😒

The version with Tom Cruise is much better but not perfect.

The only grace for the BBC version is the Edwardian costume ...


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 6:44 pm
Posts: 28593
Free Member
 

Not had enough WoTW yet?


 
Posted : 02/12/2019 7:40 pm
Posts: 7043
Full Member
 

I’m struggling with the bbc version, halfway through the second and off to bed.
Saw the Tom Cruise one in the cinema at the time and liked it. Genuine feeling of jeopardy on the first showing.


 
Posted : 03/12/2019 1:16 am
Posts: 1247
Free Member
 

It was well done.

I didn't like the flabby second act scenes with Tim Robbins; it stopped the film stone dead. Otherwise it's good fun


 
Posted : 03/12/2019 2:39 pm
Posts: 23349
Full Member
 

Finished watching it last night. Talk about a missed opportunity!

It was crap.


 
Posted : 04/12/2019 7:30 am
Posts: 1089
Free Member
 

Stuck with it, had its decent moments but I'm baffled as to how they made a drama about an Alien invasion so ****ing boring? Part 3 was 50% that lass staring glumly into the camera.


 
Posted : 04/12/2019 7:53 am
Posts: 30
Free Member
 

Ep 3 got that bad I zoned out completely and had to rewind the it when the credits rolled, convinced I had missed something


 
Posted : 04/12/2019 4:25 pm
Posts: 75
Free Member
 

Mm, should have wrapped it all up in 90 mins or so and had a little bit more fighting. On the plus side Delamere forest does have some sweet jumps. Must ride bikes more and watch less telly.


 
Posted : 04/12/2019 5:08 pm
Posts: 4829
Full Member
 

The physics of the aliens being able to walk on 3 wide set legs when the centre of gravity was clearly central bothered me. When you are thinking about details like that, the story has obviously lost you.

I was moaning about the extra superfluous knee joint (or possibly 2 of them) they had; I didn't even think of this much simpler complaint.


 
Posted : 04/12/2019 5:50 pm
Posts: 21016
Full Member
 

Well, that turned out to be a pile of toss, didn't it?


 
Posted : 04/12/2019 6:08 pm
Posts: 28712
Full Member
 

Well, that turned out to be a pile of toss, didn’t it?

Just finished it this morning.... Yes... It was pretty damn poor. I don't know what i was actually expecting, but that really wasn't it.


 
Posted : 06/12/2019 8:57 am
Page 3 / 3