Forum search & shortcuts

Vigil, TV drama
 

[Closed] Vigil, TV drama

Posts: 7098
Free Member
 

Keeping Chekov's gun in mind, I thought the love story was just inconsequential fluff filler for the dual location police procedural farce? As for it being tosh, it was brain out Sunday night telly, what did you expect?

At least they finished it. Unlike LOD.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:09 am
 IHN
Posts: 20203
Full Member
 

And the Russian patsy had a character as thin as

Yeah. I 'loved' the script

"But why would he want to work for the Russians?"

"Because he's a narcissist"

Oh, well, that explains it then, smashing.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:10 am
Posts: 3032
Free Member
 

^ good point, well made.

(bet they try and do a follow up - probably on a aircraft carrier)


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:11 am
Posts: 6943
Full Member
 

Disappointed she didn’t pile into the cop shop gobbing “now you wouldn’t ****ing believe what just happened to me!!”


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:13 am
Posts: 3385
Full Member
 

So this was really heterosexual woman realises love is just love after boyfriend dies and falls for a girl. Struggles with outdated view of family life, ditches girlfriend, goes on a u boat adventure, then gets back together with a better perspective on how humans human.

Seriously, she could have just gone on a really long hike to find herself. At least We'd have got scenery, not just distance shots of faslane!

Still. My empty Sunday night head thought it was ok.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:18 am
Posts: 3351
Full Member
 

My thoughts this morning are this might be one of the few times a US remake of a British TV series might end up being far better.

The wrapping up after the action on the sub had finished was so stilted and unimaginative. Overall it had lots of great ideas but I don't think it came together.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:30 am
Posts: 629
Full Member
 

They can't use the "claustrophobic person on a sub" setting again, maybe next series could be someone with fear of clowns in a circus setting?


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:39 am
Posts: 20914
Free Member
 

maybe next series could be someone with fear of clowns in a circus setting?

LOL!


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:40 am
Posts: 14293
Free Member
 

(bet they try and do a follow up – probably on a aircraft carrier)

Wow..... just imagine how much space they'd have on one of those!!

Not sure why I kept watching - especially when it seemed the baddy seemed to know exactly how to sabotage a sub at any given time!
Ridiculous.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:40 am
Posts: 7098
Free Member
 

Wow….. just imagine how much space they’d have on one of those!!

Not sure why I kept watching – especially when it seemed the baddy seemed to know exactly how to sabotage a sub at any given time!

On TV, I think you'd find it would look exactly as big inside as a Vanguard class nuclear sub.

I think they'd have run out of plot if the saboteur couldn't sabotage things.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:50 am
Posts: 1361
Free Member
 

Not sure why I kept watching – especially when it seemed the baddy seemed to know exactly how to sabotage a sub at any given time!

If you were going to go to the trouble of murdering people to get your recruited operative onto a nuclear missile sub on active duty, you're going to train them on how to disable it, especially as that was the point of their mission. For how much tosh the series was (and enjoyable with it), that's not really the complaint I'd be hanging my hat on


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 11:51 am
Posts: 5838
Full Member
 

Why even try picking holes in the plot and realism, it's brain out Sunday night guff. I enjoyed it. Though as ex military I must admit even I baulked at the minging state of the berets on the booties who came to escort the prisoner off the sub! Absolute trivia in relation to all the other gaffs, but one that bugs me! Never in the history of BBC drama have they ever knowingly depicted anyone wearing a beret that wouldn't get a real squaddie/bootie mocked/jailed/dishonourably discharged! Fair enough if it's on a crab or matelot though 😉


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 12:03 pm
Posts: 5164
Free Member
 

Meh, loads to pick fault on, like a sub with over 100 crew always had the same 10 people on show, the sonar operator could just go sick when they're being hunted by Russian ships and subs and then be sabotaging systems within a minute of walking out without anyone ever seeing him do anything wrong.

Taking all that away though, it was a pretty standard fair, all rushed in the end, the loose ends being tied up made no sense either, just a lot of fudging.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 12:17 pm
Posts: 3351
Full Member
 

Meh, loads to pick fault on, like a sub with over 100 crew always had the same 10 people on show
............
all rushed in the end, the loose ends being tied up made no sense either, just a lot of fudging.

More crew appearing would surely mean more fudging!


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 12:21 pm
Posts: 5409
Full Member
 

Though as ex military I must admit even I baulked at the minging state of the berets on the booties who came to escort the prisoner off the sub!

Holy shit! I'm just watching that now, the fella on the right needs a good slap for that. I've seen day 1 cadets with better berets than him!


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 12:22 pm
Posts: 17360
Full Member
 

Have any of you ever been hit in the face with a fire extinguisher? Perfect weapon - readily available, disable with blow, follow up with CO2 burns and finish the blinded attacker. Thought it could have been a little better than a simple whack.

Only watched 1.5 episodes. That was enough.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 12:31 pm
Posts: 1305
Free Member
 

Watching this last night I said something along the lines of “I wonder what plot twist will be used to save her from drowning in the missile tube, and allow her to save the boat and catch the baddies?”
Wife said shhh you don’t know that’s what’s going to happen, she could still drown.

Yeah right. 😂


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 12:32 pm
 IHN
Posts: 20203
Full Member
 

Have any of you ever been hit in the face with a fire extinguisher?

Yeah, another time I had to suppress eh "oh FFS" in order to avoid the Wrath Of MrsIHN. Baddie Fella gets smashed in the face with a fire extinguisher, and just sort of goes 'ow' and keeps on coming. Uh-huh...


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 12:37 pm
Posts: 8851
Full Member
 

My thoughts this morning are this might be one of the few times a US remake of a British TV series might end up being far better.

The wrapping up after the action on the sub had finished was so stilted and unimaginative. Overall it had lots of great ideas but I don’t think it came together.

Yes, I think the Americans could do a lot better with this.

After this and LoD I can't help feeling that Mercurio has lost the ability to script a conclusion. Anyone else remember the massive unexpected ending to Cardiac Arrest S3?


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 12:37 pm
Posts: 3351
Full Member
 

Outside of the missile tube the bangs were very clearly morse dot dot dot, dash dash dash, dot dot dot. Inside the tube, she just seemed to be doing random banging, even after realising she should try morse code.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 12:39 pm
Posts: 1486
Full Member
 

I still don't understand how you can tap out a 'dash' with a maglite....

other than that I enjoyed it for what it was... a TV Drama on BBC for Sunday evenings


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 12:48 pm
Posts: 6943
Full Member
 

XO took one for the team like a caller said up there ^^^

Any why do these things have to be six episodes? Netflix took the brakes off telly having to be 30 or 60 minutes (minus ad breaks) in order to make an episode with a balanced start, middle and end**, but no one has to stick to six episodes. Do it properly or not at all - Pffffft.

** See Snowfall for fixed-schedule episodes with beginning, middle end.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 1:18 pm
Posts: 20914
Free Member
 

Don't get me started on the bloody morse code bit. Firstly, why couldn't the same person that heard her tapping it out have heard her just banging and kicking in the first place?

And as she had a torch, why TF didn't she start hammering away with that straight away?


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 2:11 pm
Posts: 11387
Free Member
 

Think the best I can say is that it was better than another BBC costume drama


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 2:40 pm
Posts: 5409
Full Member
 

I still don’t understand how you can tap out a ‘dash’ with a maglite….

You listen for the gaps between taps.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 2:48 pm
 IHN
Posts: 20203
Full Member
 

Think the best I can say is that it was better than another BBC costume drama

Recent BBC costume dramas that are much, much better:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/m00059m9/gentleman-jack

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/p09mqzmq/the-north-water?


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 2:52 pm
 ctk
Posts: 1811
Free Member
 

Enjoyed it despite it being completely daft.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 3:38 pm
Posts: 1570
Full Member
 

Yeah, I enjoyed it too in a brain off, post 10 mile run, Sunday evening state. I did rather want someone to break rank and kick 7 shades out of the baddie on his way to the conning tower though, just for proper retribution. Top marks if it'd been the Captain.


 
Posted : 27/09/2021 3:43 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14109
Full Member
 

LOL at how many folk say they hated it but still managed to watch from beginning to end 🙂


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 7:59 am
Posts: 10987
Free Member
 

It just left me with a sinking feeling.


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 8:20 am
Posts: 7883
Full Member
 

It was fine did what it was meant to, a bit of entertainment.
That beret was awful though.
Also, and I don't know the answer, are there no RM on subs? Is it due to space? It'd have been handy after the captain's bring him back or kill him chat.


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 8:57 am
Posts: 8851
Full Member
 

Also, and I don’t know the answer, are there no RM on subs? Is it due to space? It’d have been handy after the captain’s bring him back or kill him chat.

I assume no bootnecks on bombers as silently sailing round the Atlantic at 4kt isn't exactly playing to their skill set. Attack boats might be different as insertion of SF teams is something they do.


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 9:51 am
 DrJ
Posts: 14109
Full Member
 

I assume no bootnecks on bombers as silently sailing round the Atlantic at 4kt isn’t exactly playing to their skill set. Attack boats might be different as insertion of SF teams is something they do.


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 9:56 am
Posts: 8416
Free Member
 

There are no Marines onboard the big boats.

However, they would have a weapons locker and a lot more crew to choose from than a couple of sonar operators.

Why would you send 3 unarmed crew members to deal with a murderous spy, when you could send a dozen sailors armed with SA80's?


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 10:34 am
Posts: 20914
Free Member
 

LOL at how many folk say they hated it but still managed to watch from beginning to end 🙂

I only watched it because my wife had it on.


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 10:48 am
Posts: 12401
Full Member
 

Is that a fact about powerful rifles housed on board submarines? Surely there's as much risk of them shooting something critical to the function of the boat as a sailor intent on mischief.

Actually, there was that incident in Portsmouth on a sub a few years ago, but I can't remember if the gun was already there or brought with the shooter.


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 10:52 am
Posts: 8416
Free Member
 

the gun was already there or brought with the shooter.

He had just been on gangway duty with the rifle.

It would be pretty hard to get an assault rifle through the security at Portsmouth.


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 12:13 pm
Posts: 1084
Free Member
 

LOL at how many folk say they hated it but still managed to watch from beginning to end 🙂

I think it fell into the category that it was so bad, it was quite entertaining. I confess to watching it and it gave me quite a few good laughs.


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 12:13 pm
Posts: 7883
Full Member
 

Would you not just lower the propellant load? Given that ranges of engagement would be low?


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 12:33 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14109
Full Member
 

"I only watched it because..." 🙂


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 1:06 pm
Posts: 5838
Full Member
 

Would you not just lower the propellant load? Given that ranges of engagement would be low?

Not that simple unfortunately. Modern military firearms either use a proportion of the propellant gas or the recoil impulse to function. In either case reducing the propellant would cause cycling malfunctions. You'd be on a hiding to nothing too, as reducing the kinetic energy of a bullet to point where it wouldn't damage equipment would mean it is wasn't very effective at neutralising a pyscho Russian spy, or similarly unlikely ne'r do wells!


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 1:07 pm
Posts: 9434
Full Member
 

Recent BBC costume dramas that are much, much better:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/m00059m9/gentleman-jack
/blockquote>

I didn't like that series, the lead character had a massive nose.


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 1:24 pm
 DrJ
Posts: 14109
Full Member
 

I didn’t like that series, the lead character had a massive nose.

Good point (see what I did there?). Perhaps the Radio Times should give nose information for the cast in dramas, so we can see if we are likely to enjoy them?


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 2:00 pm
Posts: 6943
Full Member
 

Pinocchio - ****ing shit. 1*


 
Posted : 28/09/2021 2:12 pm
Page 5 / 5