Forum search & shortcuts

US Election
 

[Closed] US Election

Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

chestercopperpot - Member
@ chewkw - Yeah I doubt it will happen, Trump becoming president. But what a meeting of minds that would be!

The demon is inside them so if they vote Clinton, that woman!, to be the next President then they just have to bear with her ...

Let China and Russia take the lead ...

When Jeremy Clarkson sweeps to power in 2020 all my dreams will have come true.

As much as I think Jeremy Clarkson is funny I would be a lunatic to think he could be a leader ... in BritLand realistically. BritLand is going to rot with EU if they maintain the current membership. You heard it from me first. 😀

chestercopperpot - Member
Bear Grylls as chancellor.

Think he earns more being a celebrity than a chancellor with less headache.


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 12:46 am
Posts: 66118
Full Member
 

jambalaya - Member

@mike if Regan could be President then on an acting basis Spacy should be a shoe in

Martin Sheen For President Again


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 12:48 am
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

Northwind - Member
Martin Sheen For President Again

Reason(s)? 😛


 
Posted : 24/03/2016 12:58 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

http://gawker.com/national-enquirer-ted-cruz-has-had-at-least-5-extramar-1767002606

Things just got really dirty in the republican nomination contest

Edit: that's not to say there's anything true about the allegation. It just shows how aggressive and dirty the competition has become that the two camps are now pumping stories like this about their rivals


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 11:13 pm
Posts: 7126
Full Member
 

@konabunny, that's an interesting read:

That's because Cruz doesn't tithe. He and his wife donated less than 1 percent of their income to charity and nothing to churches, including to their own in Houston, according to tax returns from 2006 to 2010, the most recent Cruz has released.

Sounds like a bit of a freeloader.


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 11:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It does seem a bit weird that Reverend Lovejoy didn't tap him on the shoulder and say "ffs Ted are your arms too short to reach your pockets?"

There is another story about Trump mistaking the tray carrying the communion host for the donations plate and chucking a bunch of money in it.

Neither of the front runners seems particularly religious. I almost feel sorry for the evangelical right, they must be spewing...


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 11:39 pm
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

Ya, anyone but that woman! That Clinton woman! ... that is a disgusting woman!. 🙄


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 11:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Indeed its taken a dive for the gutter. Trump doesn't believe Cruz wasn't responsible for the GQ cover re-print or more likley imo just thinks its a perfect excuse to get more personal and aggressive


 
Posted : 25/03/2016 11:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm seeing some conflicting information - is Ted Cruz a Mormon or not?


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 1:54 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

As far as I know he isn't,Mitt Romney is from the last go, looks like as an earlier prediction the republicans will tear each other to pieces in the primaries and that's not going to look good for the bloody winner.

Each of these plays into Clinton's hands (much to the disgust of chewkw up there) personally a steady, mature and thinking president would be welcome at the point the world is now.


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 3:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Clinton is reprehensible.

Cruz isn't a Mormon. He claims to be a baptist, I think, although apparently he supports the church about as much as I do.

I think this might turn out to be a long game by Kasich or Rubio, who sweep back in at the convention because they're neither loopy Trump or purportedly a shagger Cruz.


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 8:53 am
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

mikewsmith - Member
Each of these plays into Clinton's hands (much to the disgust of chewkw up there) personally a steady, mature and thinking president would be welcome at the point the world is now.

If they choose Clinton then the deserve all they get and the status of superpower will slowly change hand ... time to pass the baton to the East.


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 3:34 pm
Posts: 8527
Free Member
 

You do seem to have some issues with female politicians chewy, very 1970s


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 4:06 pm
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

Nobeerinthefridge - Member
You do seem to have some issues with female politicians chewy, very 1970s

Nope.

No problem with female politicians at all so long as they are not attention seeking PC needy lefties.

Thatcher is great and strong and I would vote for someone like her anytime.

Of the current female leaders ...

1. Merkel - crikey the spinster ... uncontrolled emotion ... so wanting to be liked and to be praised and to get her hands on the "noble peace" prize ... so wanting to be worshiped.

2. Sturgeon - crikey do you notice the way her head moves/shakes when she is speaking? Is she trying to hold others at ransom by threatening for another independent referendum? FFS woman! Stop moving and shaking your heads when talking! This woman is not a clam woman ... wind her up a bit more and you shall see her true nature.

3. Clinton - That woman! That disgusting woman! So so sooo needy!

🙄


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 7:03 pm
 jimw
Posts: 3307
Free Member
 


Thatcher is great and strong and I would vote for someone like her anytime.

Well, knock me down with a feather and tickle me with it. I would never have guessed that.


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 7:08 pm
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

jimw - Member
Thatcher is great and strong and I would vote for someone like her anytime.

Well, knock me down with a feather and tickle me with it. I would never have guessed that.

Told you, you lot are wrong ...

In those days I voted for Labour with Neil Kinnock at the helm and later I voted for Paddy Ashdown at Lib Dem.

Also I think at one point I voted for Green as I was trying to impress some birds ... Birds were in Green party using their seductive charms to get me to vote Green so I did but they took me for a ride. i.e. I did not pull. Dammit!

Nowadays when I think of my past voting patterns I feel dirty and disgusting ... I mean I voted for Neil Kinnock ... FFS!

Ya, I also voted for Tories some year later ...

😯


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 7:17 pm
Posts: 8164
Free Member
 

If you "vote for green to impress some birds" you're a doubly reprehensible person.


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 7:22 pm
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

gofasterstripes - Member
If you "vote for green to impress some birds" you're a doubly reprehensible person.

I sold my soul to the devil in those days for temptation. 😆

The female devils were all lefties in those days unfortunately ... 😆

I mean I even joined the Acting club ... FFS!

I was low ... very low. 😆


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 7:26 pm
Posts: 8164
Free Member
 

To clarify, both the language and, more importantly, abusing the right to vote.


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 7:32 pm
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

gofasterstripes - Member
To clarify, both the language and, more importantly, abusing the right to vote.

Ya, but who told you that you are right? 😆


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 7:38 pm
Posts: 66118
Full Member
 

chewkw - Member

1. Merkel - crikey the spinster

She's been married twice 😆


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 7:43 pm
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

Northwind - Member
chewkw - Member
1. Merkel - crikey the spinster

She's been married twice

Ya, no children, no normal family, no being comes out from her body ... spinster she is! 😈


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 7:44 pm
Posts: 66118
Full Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 8:11 pm
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

Northwind - Member

Ya, no difference ... spinster's temperament she has ... 😈


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 8:13 pm
Posts: 8164
Free Member
 

Ok yodakw


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 9:05 pm
Posts: 8164
Free Member
 

Ok yodakw


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 9:09 pm
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

Twice you have said gofasterstripes. 😯

Doubling of power is not ...


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 9:11 pm
Posts: 1379
Free Member
 

This woman is not a clam woman

A clam woman, yesterday:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/03/2016 11:09 pm
Posts: 19545
Free Member
 

arrpee - Member
This woman is not a clam woman

A clam woman, yesterday:

D'Oh! I mean calm! Calm!

Not clam but she could be a clam woman too! 😆


 
Posted : 27/03/2016 3:05 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
Posts: 151
Free Member
 

It would be polite.


 
Posted : 27/03/2016 11:17 am
Posts: 66118
Full Member
 

Instead of beating up protestors at the convention they can just execute them, good idea.


 
Posted : 27/03/2016 6:23 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

I hope that's an ironic petition by the liberal elite.


 
Posted : 27/03/2016 7:16 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Cruz wins Wisconsin, as predicted by polls. And Sanders beats Hillary. (Wonder if Panama had anything to do with that.) Trump's polling now starting to look a lot shakier.

Still looks like Hillary has enough in the bag to take the nomination but the chance of an open convention for the GOP looks much more possible now... (Not sure when the last open convention was.) Did Trump go too for with the abortion comments and subsequent flip-flopping? Bizarre comments on nuclear proliferation a step too far?

Crazy campaign. Wonder what else it has in store. 😀


 
Posted : 06/04/2016 6:10 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Perhaps Trump is there to make Cruz look moderate and appeal to the middle ground...


 
Posted : 06/04/2016 6:43 am
 dazh
Posts: 13392
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Trump's polling now starting to look a lot shakier.

Alarmingly I'm finding this quite troubling. As much as I fear a President Trump, I also equally fear a President Cruz. Cruz is much more electable than Trump so I do wonder why any lefty progressives would be celebrating the prospect of Trump's failure to win the nomination.

The GOP convention is going to be a bloodbath though if Trump doesn't win enough delegates. The biggest danger for the democrats is that this will breed complacency. The ability of the GOP to regroup around the eventual candidate after the convention shouldn't be underestimated.


 
Posted : 06/04/2016 11:49 am
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

I agree dazh. (If it came across that I was pleased with this setback for Drumpf, then, my mistake.)

As much as I dislike Trump, I'd rather see him up against a democrat than Cruz. I think the GOP would unite behind Cruz without too many problems. Pity about Sanders' late showing. Not enough real estate left for him I reckon.


 
Posted : 06/04/2016 12:00 pm
Posts: 13643
Free Member
 

As much as I love Bernie (and I do!) I honestly (and sadly) think that he is as unelectable as Trump. So H. Clinton might be a better nominee there.

GOP: As far as I can work out it's almost a dead cert for a brokered convention, which is something I knew nothing about until I got obsessed with this crazy primary! However I now know this:

1) All delegate pledges are reset to zero- meaning that [u]anyone[/u] is now able to stand for Republican nomination however:

2) As of 2012 only candidates who have acquired a majority in 8 states can put themselves forward (rule 40) but:

3) There is a meeting in July (before the convention) of the 112 member Republican rules committee that might change this so that people other than Trump/Cruz can stand.

Conclusion:

I think that the GOP mainstream are going to push for John Kasich or Paul Ryan to be their nominee for POTUS, and most likely get one of them just as long as they can agree who to push for! (Could also be Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush or in fact several others, even Mitt Romney. So many!!)

[url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-35888135 ]Sauce[/url]


 
Posted : 06/04/2016 12:17 pm
 dazh
Posts: 13392
Full Member
Topic starter
 

[url= http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/19/hillary-clinton-wins-new-york-primary-bernie-sanders ]Well that's curtains for Bernie[/url]. Shame, although I wonder if the conciliatory language from Clinton is a sign that she's thinking of offering him the position of running mate?


 
Posted : 20/04/2016 11:57 am
Posts: 35100
Full Member
 

Cruz pulling out. The Trump is actually the republican candidate (for the time being)

😯

I never thought that would happen!


 
Posted : 04/05/2016 6:41 am
Posts: 52609
Free Member
 

Must have been the Cruz's Dad killed JFK story...
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36195317
Well it will be a political bloodbath come November (well from here on in) unless Kasich manages to win enough to take it to convention then I expect actual blood to be spilled.
In many ways it's good Cruz is gone he's 90% as far out to the right as Trump just in the same way as standing next to Boris would make Krusty the Clown seem normal being compared to Trump makes him look less of a prick.


 
Posted : 04/05/2016 6:51 am
Posts: 57405
Full Member
 

Listening to Cruz this morning, he sounded like an evil Ned Flanders

[img] /revision/latest?cb=20141121004306[/img]


 
Posted : 04/05/2016 8:35 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

@nickc me neither, well certainly not initially


 
Posted : 04/05/2016 8:39 am
 dazh
Posts: 13392
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Strangely I'm kind of relieved. I was much more worried about a Cruz presidency than Trump. A religious zealot is much more dangerous than an incompetent narcissist. This will be a much closer race than the Clinton camp think it will be. Trump has the charisma and populist support that she lacks, and he'll dump or water down the crazy policies and be much more serious from here on in.


 
Posted : 04/05/2016 9:47 am
 dazh
Posts: 13392
Full Member
Topic starter
 

[url= http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/23/donald-trump-poll-hillary-clinton-presidential-election-2016 ]Time to start pricing up bottled water and crates of tinned food?[/url]


 
Posted : 24/05/2016 8:16 am
Page 6 / 7