Forum menu
Basing political preference on annoying some people on the internet you've never met = shouldn't really be allowed to vote.
Not being able to read properly = shouldn't really be allowed to vote.
Sadly, Grum, even idiots are allowed to vote... ๐ Even Ponce. It's called Democracy, apparently...
Interesting that little Tory Boy here finds those opposed to his beloved party and his Aunty Maggie, 'annoying'.
In fact, quite why he reads their posts astounds me; you'd think, if he found them annoying, he wouldn't bother. Hey ho. There's no accounting for stupidity, it seems.
Is paddedfredboymada aware of the irony of most of his posts, or is he lost in his own ego, again.
That didn't take long - give it another week and he'll be gone, again...
There's no accounting for stupidity, it seems.
You got that one right...
Hmm. Seems I've rattled the monkey cage...
Not being able to read properly = shouldn't really be allowed to vote.
Ah, that's sad, Ponce (Someone read this out to him please, slowly and carefully, thanks). You can get help with literacy skills at your local Adult Education centre. Better hurry though, before the lovely Tories close them all down...
Shh now children; CSI's on.
Not being able to read properly = shouldn't really be allowed to vote.
I reckon everybody read your post as grum did Houns.
Let's have another look at it, shall we ?
[i][b]"I really hope the Conservatives do win - Mainly because it'd really annoy the most annoying t**ts on this forum"[/b][/i]
Yup ...... seems to me that you preference is for a Tory victory mainly because it will annoy some people on the internet you've never met.
I'm inclined to believe that either people [b]want[/b] to be lied to, or that people who tell the truth are unelectable (is this the same thing ?)
The little Tory Boys are a bit quiet this morning...
Simon; most folk just want a quiet life, and not have to worry too much about what's going on to much beyond their garden gates. They may suspect they are being lied to, but as long as they still have their home comforts, they will be content. Hence the Tories' tactics of trying to unsettle people by stirring up fear and resentment.
Hence the Tories' tactics of trying to unsettle people by stirring up fear and resentment.
That's funny, I could have sworn it was the other two who were saying "at all costs dont vote tory, they'll kill us all and wreck everything"? While the tories seem to be saying "this is what we'll do, be wary of their policies but ultimately it's up to you who you vote for". In fact, there was a BBC analysis of the election material last night with that attractive psychologist lass pointing out that the lab/lib were on a strong foot as most people are subconsciously disproportionately affected by scare stories about other people, whereas tories has chosen to take the positive route and were likely to suffer because of it.
they'll kill us all and wreck everything
well, to be fair, they would prefer to hunt us common people with dogs were they allowed ...
Coffeeking, get us a double Espresso would yer, and be quick about it please.
๐ Just put some in the machine. Can you get to Scotland fast enough?
In fact, there was a BBC analysis of the election material last night with that attractive psychologist lass pointing out that the lab/lib were on a strong foot as most people are subconsciously disproportionately affected by scare stories about other people, whereas tories has chosen to take the positive route and were likely to suffer because of it.
Is that the same BBC that is apparently biased against the Tories?
Also, the Tories are hardly being positive - all their campagin posters round here feature a grinning Gordon Brown with various negative slogans about him selling off gold, increasing the national debt etc - nothing about their policies.
Their main policy seems to be tax cuts for the rich and slashing public services - summed up with the meaningless 'vote for change' slogan.
SFB, you assume that politicians know the truth? i'm sure 85% of MP have no idea WTF is going on behind the scenes.
oh and sight hijack but well done Gordon for tackling bankers bonuses ๐ฏ
Also, the Tories are hardly being positive - all their campagin posters round here feature a grinning Gordon Brown with various negative slogans about him selling off gold, increasing the national debt etc - nothing about their policies.
TBH I haven't seen any campaign posters by them around here, other than the humourous/modified ones ones put on here. Their TV and radio work has seemed very positive, on the whole, for me, and their local representative has sent out a couple of leaflets that had very little in the way of negativity in it unlike the others. Obviously your local area seems to be taking a different tack.
I heard a Troy spokes man on the radio the other day and he spent the whole time talking about what has happened under labour. At no point did he say anything about what they would do to change this.
In my borough, the Conningbastards are the only party (bar the BNP) who've not been out canvassing in any of the poorer areas. They have been seen in the posher bits though, proving that they really don't give a stuff about anyone unless they've got a fair bit of money. Scum.
SFB, you assume that politicians know the truth? i'm sure 85% of MP have no idea WTF is going on behind the scenes
not in the least, but I do think they're quite willing to lie about what they [b]are[/b] aware of
The other thing that really hacks me off is when politicians don't answer the question asked. Virginia Bottomley seeemd to start the rot back in the 80's, but all the others soon took it up. I can't understand why they sound so self satisfied as they misdirect when the fact that they're not answering properly establishes their willingness to distort their intentions and the truth. I now turn off the TV or radio whenever I hear it.
that is because they really dont know ...apparently it would be unfair to expect an opposition party wanting to lead the government to say what they would do once they got into power. It is all just hard decisons, together we ill aspire to great things in 13 years of labour we have had. Osborne scares me he is a light weight and I fear he could really f@ck things up with his lack of a grasp lets hope they at least get clarke to help him
At no point did he[TORY} say anything about what they would do to change this
SFB They cant give honest answers as the public want the media friendly face of Blair and Cameron. Look at the treatments of Brown for example over Rochdale lady. Has anyone never been nice to someones face and then slagged them off afterwards for example- I have met you for example ๐ ? Would we really feel better if a politician said I dont know what we will do to get out of this economic quandary but I am sure we will just muddle along and do the best we can?
We encourage bland answers and we get bland characterless career politicians of all hues.
They have been seen in the posher bits though, proving that they really don't give a stuff about anyone unless they've got a fair bit of money. Scum.
On balance it doesn't really though does it. It just means they're aware that poorer people in an area are not going to vote for them (on loyalty/poor turnout/etc grounds) and so are spending more time in areas they think they can secure. Makes sense to me and I'm sure all of the parties do it. It's called choosing your market, if they didn't do it they've be pretty useless.
It just means they're aware that poorer people in an area are not going to vote for them (on loyalty/poor turnout/etc grounds) and so are spending more time in areas they think they can secure.
So, if they want to be in Government, and represent [b]all[/b] the people of the UK [b]equally[/b], why not reach out to those who've not traditionally voted Tory, and talk to them about their [b]policies[/b]?
Oh, yeah, right, sorry... ๐
if they want to be in Government, and represent all the people of the UK equally
what a bizarre notion - equal voice regardless of family history, school attended, income generated, property owned, trades union affiliation, pressure group membership, party sponsorship etc etc.
You'd think we were living in a representative democracy or something ๐
Shit, sorry, you're right, Hilldodger.
How silly of me!
But I thought the Tories weren't just the party of the priveleged and 'we're all in this together'? ๐
they only say that they dont mean it hence why they all went to Eton and the Bullingdon club?
Where they campaign is not really representative of anything otehr than their choice of likely wins though is it, unless you jump to conclusions. Likewise in the conservative-stronghold down the road from my old house there has been next to no labour or lib dems actively out and about. I don't think that means much against them, it just means that they prey on less well off areas.
The people in this picture are all "in it together". However, some of them are stronger than others, and this means that they will be able to kill and eat the weaker ones so as to be able to survive until they are rescued. ๐
It is also very noticeable that a lot of them don't have any clothes. I don't know why.
I don't know why.
to make it easier to locate the tasty bits ๐
well public school boys and the erm games they play eh ?
Somebody has drawn a tiny penis on a Dave near me.
Somebody else would appear to have thrown a bag of excrement at him too.

