Forum menu
The irony of the wo...
 

[Closed] The irony of the woofterball world cup...

Posts: 14
Free Member
 

FIFA's ethical principals

PMSL


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 5:45 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
 

And will someone, please, tell me why 'woofter' may be considered offensive, any more so than 'idiot', 'imbecile', 'stupid', or 'moron'. I'm sure someone with learning difficulties

I imagine that imbecile, idiot, stupid & moron are very offensive when directed at people with learning difficulties...unless you are suggesting that people with learning difficulties are 'stupid'?

If so - it highlights your ignorance.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 6:27 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I forgot the offended of Royal Tunbridge Wells inhabit this place.

No matter, but I do hope that noone on here has even so much as smirked at that STW/Hitler downfall video - Hitler was hardly something to laugh about now was he (Duntmatter, for starters...)?

The offended of Royal Tunbridge Wells, yeah. Always hunting for perfectly acceptable conduct to work themselves into a flap about. ๐Ÿ™„

zokes - you say yourself you don't know where the 'lines of offence are drawn.' This very phrase suggests your ignorance of what acceptability means. Nobody draws lines. It's just simple respect for other people.

On the Downfall video, you've made an error in comparing my laughing at a witty and well-observed piece of humour about STW with ignorant (literally, by your own admission) and contemptuous bile.

I was not laughing about Hitler, but about STW. Even [u]if[/u] I was laughing about Hitler, that would not be to condone him in any way. For your implied criticism to be valid, I would have to have been laughing with Hitler at a joke he made about the inferiority of gay people, for example. See?

PS, It's 'duntmatter', not 'Duntmatter'.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 7:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It duntmatter, surely? ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 8:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Started off badly:

[img] [/img]

Then it got worse:

[img] [/img]

And worse:

[img] [/img]

And worser:

[img] [/img]

Until it was so huge Zokes could no longer claw his way out:

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 9:15 pm
Posts: 33979
Full Member
 

I prefer wendyball, just because a bunch of grown men immediately start behaving like ten year old girls as soon as things don't go their own way, snivelling and throwing themselves on the ground.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 9:37 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

I prefer wendyball, just because a bunch of grown men immediately start behaving like ten year old girls as soon as things don't go their own way, snivelling and throwing themselves on the ground.

Yeah, because that happens. Every. Single. Time.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 9:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

HEH![img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 9:51 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

As far as non-sequiturs go, that's a goodie.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 9:54 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Yeah, because that happens. Every. Single. Time.

Jumpers for goalposts. Sunday league. Autumn evenings in the park. Blah blah.

Trying to think of a televised game I've seen in the last decade where it hasn't happened. The game isn't broken but those who play it and run it at the level we see on tv are.

But let's not get distracted from beating up on someone who is only sticking up for free speech.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:05 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Trying to think of a televised game I've seen in the last decade where it hasn't happened

Think harder.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:19 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Ok.

Done.

Still haven't.

Mind you, I've hardly watched any over the last year or two. I'm thinking there wouldn't be any in that timeframe.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:42 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

I guess at the end of the day it does not really matter. The mods are obviously cool with this thread so I will go back to my Guardian lined burrow 8)

Incidentally, I am off to Arsenal/Stoke on Sat so will shout at anyone who looks like they are play acting. Might even point them at this thread ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Actually, I went to sleep...

I imagine that imbecile, idiot, stupid & moron are very offensive when directed at people with learning difficulties...unless you are suggesting that people with learning difficulties are 'stupid'?

If so - it highlights your ignorance.

Following your bizzarre line of reasoning would imply that calling all footballers queers is only offensive to those who are? As I seem to have highlighted Ronaldo in particular, I think there's plenty of evidence that he's not homosexual, so there's no need to worry ๐Ÿ™„

Really, what if a person with learning difficulties read Junkyard's insult to me? Moron (as Elfinmuppet in one of his previous guises pointed out to me when I lost my rag with him slightly) is an offensive word. Interestingly, as it's a once-medical word, idiot also fits on the scale that was used to medically describe those of low mental capacity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moron_(psychology)

Personally, I find potentially insulting people with learning disabilities a lot more offensive than the rabid homophobia of which I seem to have been accused. Clearly, the offended of Royal Singletrack World have kind of missed this bit.

I prefer wendyball, just because a bunch of grown men immediately start behaving like ten year old girls

So being sexist now are we?

I was not laughing about Hitler, but about STW. Even if I was laughing about Hitler, that would not be to condone him in any way.

You were deriving mirth and humour from an exceedingly un-funny person: responsible for the deaths of millions, the persecution of several races, and ironically (given the nature of this thread and your 'uproar'), homosexuals. Dress it up how you like, but finding humour in a historical character so abhorent is a damned sight worse than any homophobia I've been perceived to be guilty of, even though I was merely using language that has been 'acceptable' to describe football on this forum.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:49 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

I hope they're broken at the end of it. But don't go giving that [swear filter avoidance] Pulis anything to be crowing about.

Saw the edit too J. ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:49 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

But let's not get distracted from beating up on someone who is only sticking up for free speech

Yes it will be a terrible blow for freedom when you can no longer call a homosexual by a derogatory term. Another bad day like when we stopped the minstrals and gollywogs. Where will this agenda for respect end?


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:49 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

deadlydarcy:

I hope they're broken at the end of it.....

Given the current climate, you will just have to imagine the horrific names I just called you 8)


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:52 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Aren't you from paddy stock JY? pffft.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:53 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Go on, it's late Jamie. They might not be watching...


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:53 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Go on, it's late Jamie. They might not be watching...

They are always watching....

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:54 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

That's the best I've seen you looking in ages. Did you get those guns from the climbing? ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:57 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Nah. Masturbation mostly.


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 10:59 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

๐Ÿ˜†


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 11:00 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

๐Ÿ˜ฅ thought I may have gotten a song lyric for biting


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 11:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dress it up how you like, but finding humour in a historical character so abhorent is a damned sight worse than any homophobia I've been perceived to be guilty of

Eh? So I should only laugh at good people? Okaaay.

Is this song wrong too? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Has_Only_Got_One_Ball


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 11:28 pm
Posts: 7130
Full Member
 

**** me. If you don't get it zokes then god help you.

And will someone, please, tell me why 'woofter' may be considered offensive, any more so than 'idiot', 'imbecile', 'stupid', or 'moron'. I'm sure someone with learning difficulties could take offence at all those terms, yet they are bandied about often enough.

So you think that some with LD would take offence at those words? WHY WOULD THEY? Why would you ASSUME they would? Is it because you feel that anyone with LD is a moron?


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 11:39 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

thought I may have gotten a song lyric for biting

Hands up, Baby hands up. Gimme your love, gimme, gimme your love, baby put your hands up...

Never too latey matey ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 11:44 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How about

The offence in woofterball - slight tho it is is in using a slang term for gay as an insult.

If you are a woofter its offensive to be compared to a footballer

If you are a woofter and like playing with balls - then you are playing wooftervball - clear?


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 11:45 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

here be really offended then

<


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 11:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Too slow ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 15/12/2010 11:49 pm
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

OMG i think like TJ ๐Ÿ˜ฏ


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 12:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

with discrimination? ๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 12:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

think like TJ

๐Ÿ™‚ Is this the oxmoron thread

a) people choose to be offended by what in the grand scheme of things are very minor issues, and

This is an interesting point, I'm not sure if people on here are actually offended. But neither are they getting offended on behalf of others. I think some folks take it as their social responsibility to confront racism, sexism, homophobia etc. where they can.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 12:07 am
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
 

hey zokes, has being upside down led to the money in your pockets falling out so you can get a round in? ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 12:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

So you think that some with LD would take offence at those words? WHY WOULD THEY? Why would you ASSUME they would? Is it because you feel that anyone with LD is a moron?

So why would someone who is homosexual automatically take offence at the use of the word 'woofer'? Do you use your brain for thinking, or is it just in there to stop your head from wobbling about too much?


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 2:39 am
 Kit
Posts: 24
Free Member
 

So did we establish yet if football is for gayers?


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 3:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Football's for anyone, regardless of race, gender or sexuality. Bit like other sports then, such as cycling, for example.

Need help with anything else?


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 3:23 am
Posts: 495
Full Member
 

"Sticks and stones may break my bones............, jesus get a life or some of you actually believe what you write.
Have a read of Roger Mellies Profanisaurus you Chutney Ferrets


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 3:50 am
 Kit
Posts: 24
Free Member
 

Need help with anything else?

Yeah, which one's my arse, and which one's my elbow again? And I need my nose wiping, ooh and my socks pulling up.

Fanksssss :mrgreen:


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 4:15 am
Posts: 7130
Full Member
 

Lol zokes. Try harder. Have a think about it, but if you really don't understand - I'm not going to waste my time getting worried about it. Happy Christmas.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 8:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Lol zokes. Try harder. Have a think about it, but if you really don't understand - I'm not going to waste my time getting worried about it. Happy Christmas.

Clearly your brain is just a head stabilising device then, if that's the limit of your sentient activity...


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 9:03 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

zokes

So why would someone who is homosexual automatically take offence at the use of the word 'woofer'? Do you use your brain for thinking, or is it just in there to stop your head from wobbling about too much?

Thats not the offensive thing here

The offensive thing is using a slang word for homosexual as an insult.

Thats the bit you don't understand.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 9:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

<drifts in>

Is zokes still digging ?

<drifts out>


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 9:18 am
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

inbred853 - Member
"Sticks and stones may break my bones............, jesus get a life or some of you actually believe what you write.
Have a read of Roger Mellies Profanisaurus you Chutney Ferrets

Clearly you don't believe what you write then? That's got to be a weird feeling.


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 9:29 am
Posts: 5559
Free Member
 

So why would someone who is homosexual automatically take offence at the use of the word 'woofer'?

it is a derogatory term - check a dictionary.
derogatory [d??r?g?t?r? -tr?]
adj
tending or intended to detract, disparage, or belittle; intentionally offensive

Do you use your brain for thinking, or is it just in there to stop your head from wobbling about too much

you compound this ignorance of the word you use by insulting the intelligence of people who point out that it is an intentionally offensive term EXCELLENT
You can say you think it is ok to use a derogatoiry term towards a group if you wish - I suppose everyone has the right to be rude and offensive if they wish- but to claim it is not offensive/derogatory/belittling is silly.
Is the n word ok to black man
calling a woman a female dog
an asian a ****
Are no words offensive then?


 
Posted : 16/12/2010 10:44 am
Page 2 / 4