Forum menu
THE DECIDING ASHES ...
 

[Closed] THE DECIDING ASHES TEST: possible spoilers within

Posts: 36
Free Member
 

BTW, I like the complete and utter silence from you Pom's on this thread, up until the last hour or so anyway

you come up with something interesting to say a bout a dot ball then! ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:05 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

so should he go for the follow on if he gets the chance? ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:05 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Stoner - Member

BTW, I like the complete and utter silence from you Pom's on this thread, up until the last hour or so anyway

you come up with something interesting to say a bout a dot ball then!

*Applauds!*

๐Ÿ˜‰


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh, they don't like it up 'em


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Haddin 1, SR 11.11, 111/7


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

so should he go for the follow on if he gets the chance?

Now that really does have to come under "phrases you didn't expect to see".


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

BTW, I like the complete and utter silence from you Pom's on this thread, up until the last hour or so anyway fair weather supporters eh?

sorry bud, been too busy watching us kick your arses. ๐Ÿ˜€

111-7 from 71-0

as for the follow on, i don't know


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:09 pm
Posts: 10962
Full Member
 

I apologise for my lack of crowing mr psychle - it appears my prediction from our 1st innings yesterday was a little premature. Quite a shower now, eh.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:09 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

you've got to make them follow on if you have the chance, no time to regroup.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:10 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

theflatboy - Member
you've got to make them follow on if you have the chance, no time to regroup.

Not at the Oval you don't.....

Get in, post a big number then watch the pitch take a nosedive on the last few sessions.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

utter silence from you Pom's

eh-hem (I posted)

I agree with this [cricinfo]:

"[This pitch] is absolutely ragging. Swann's bowling hand grenades practically every single ball," is the verdict from SK Warne.

Good job we made 300+ in out first innings!


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i would - get them straight back in again and have another go at them.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:16 pm
Posts: 10962
Full Member
 

The pundits on TMS were with the Cap'n on the follow on - (potentially) batting last on a wicket that's already shonky could be a bad move.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I think with a score under 150 then you really do have to make them follow on - not that it's going to happen.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I would too but these Aussies are tough guys and I reckon they'll avoid it. Johnson's swinging it about ATM


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

word, moot point now innit.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Anyway, all of a sudden 332 looks a very good knock (the pity is we could have got so much more!)


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Thank **** Warnie retired ๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

not moot just yet,,,


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

i've only got cricinfo updating so prob a bit behind, but they need 133 to avoid it don't they?


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:23 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

The Oval cuts up and with the weather as it is in that London's Famous London, batting last on that track would be a wrong 'un.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:23 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Ahem........!

๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

boing


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:25 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

just 2 in 2.... the follow on still on even if not the appropriate strategy ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:26 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

good, out of our hands now. a lead of 200 on this pitch should be conclusive


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:31 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

any body want to join me in a rain dance


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 4:53 pm
Posts: 36
Free Member
 

"Clark's very unhappy".

Ahhh. Diddums. ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:00 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

roundwheels - Member
any body want to join me in a rain dance

No thanks. Looking forward to a nice sunny Saturday!

๐Ÿ˜€


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well... we've avoided the follow on at least... certainly sounds like the pitch is disintegrating rapidly, I wonder how much help we'll get out of it? I guess we need to somehow roll the English for 100 or less ๐Ÿ™„ [i]and[/i] then somehow manage to chase down 300 on a strip seemingly riddled with landmines ๐Ÿ˜† A tough proposition from here it has to be said ๐Ÿ™


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:07 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

but surely the famed aussie grit, determination and application will be ideally suited to that kind of run chase?


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:10 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

we shall see... we shall see ๐Ÿ™‚


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:18 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

psychle - Member
we shall see... we shall see

We did see..... we did see....!

An epic collapse.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:19 pm
Posts: 10962
Full Member
 

160... but let's see how we get on in our 2nd innings before we get a tanker of John Smith's on standby for Freddy.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:21 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

so... 172 behind, not good. Sure as **** not what we'd have been expecting this at this stage (and I guarantee not one English supporter expected it either! ๐Ÿ˜† )


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:22 pm
Posts: 50252
Free Member
 

Thwaites Bomber, please! Give the lad his due!

And, moreover, it's all about Broad, not Flintoff! The future is here!


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

its a calypso collapso according to tuffers


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:25 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I guarantee not one English supporter expected it

I didn't. This is not how this pitch is supposed to behave.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 5:55 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I rather suspect that the big gap between the 4th and 5th tests was to allow the oval pitch to be prepared to suit the situation and guess what, its a result pitch. If england had led 1-0 going into the final game it would have been flatter that a witch's t-i-t.

the best bowling team will win this series and that 'should' be us.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 6:03 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I read a little article in the Indie about "not doctoring the pitch" which made me think they were doctoring the pitch!


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Why shouldn't they prepare the pitch to suit England? Most other countries prepare pitches to suit their team.

Though it wasn't obviously going to be like this at the toss - that or Ponting is a complete idiot.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 5976
Free Member
 

so... 172 behind, not good. Sure as **** not what we'd have been expecting this at this stage (and I guarantee not one English supporter expected it either! )

Nope, was expecting the Aussies to post 400 plus, especially given the way we were batting this morning.

the best bowling team will win this series and that 'should' be us.

S'funny, if you look at the bowling AND batting stats, we should have been buried in this series.


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ponting is a brilliant capt IMO. It remains to be seen what the aussie bowlers do with the pitch conditions to see how this is going to go IMO. Based on cricinfo Strauss and Cook seem calm ATM.

God this exciting - I've got to go to the shops now !!!!!


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

cook out - pitch is turning sharply now. swann must be looking forward to bowling in the 4th innings


 
Posted : 21/08/2009 6:24 pm
Page 2 / 5