Forum menu
I started a thread yesterday which asked a question that appears to have been so far beyond the pale that it has been not just closed but scoured from history. As such I can't thank responders, particularly the one that gave me the answer I needed. I'm a polite and appreciative person so I'm doing it here- thank you mysterious stranger.
Hopefully the cream will help. 🙂
FWIW, I don't know what you're referring to and can't see any reported posts with your name on it. Did you post using a different account?
I seen it. It wasn't so much Sweepy's post but some dodgier recommendations that were offered, so the whole thing got bombed.
Ah yes, found it. That would fall under 'promoting potentially illegal activity,' then.
[quote=Cougar ]Ah yes, found it. That would fall under 'promoting potentially illegal activity,' then.
What about the strava and "cheeky" singletrack threads then? 😆
Hopefully the cream will help.
Pudding?
Do you Mods have one of those Men in Black neurolizer thingies but for threads?
Blink! Nothing to see here.
[img] 
[/img]
Do you Mods have one of those Men in Black neurolizer thingies but for threads?
No, 20 odd years of shift work means I don't need one.
promoting potentially illegal activity
That's nearly everything, potentially. It kinda depends how you do whatever it is 🙂
I could be sitting on someones face on camera, right now, just reading your post, in Bradford.
*strolls by whistling the game of thrones theme*
I could be sitting on someones face on camera, right now, just reading your post, in Bradford.
Mmmffmmmfff mmmmfffff fffmmmmfffmmmmmmm!
I could be sitting on someones face on camera, right now, just reading your post, in Bradford.
Pudding?
I didn't realise Bradford was illegal. When did that happen?
Since the air hit >.5% THC
*strolls by whistling the game of thrones theme*
Mmmffmmmfff mmmmfffff fffmmmmfffmmmmmmm!
Good version.
is hoofing someone in the slats not potentially ileagal activity.